Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

There Is A Difference Between Our Democratic Rights, And Doing And Saying Whatever We Want

So who read the analysis piece entitled “The niqab debate, let's not forget, is about individual rights.  In the end, this is a country based on individual rights and the rule of law, not majority sentiment”, written by Neil McDonald of the CBC?

In part of the analyses piece he states:
Boswell then ruled that wearing a niqab does not interfere in any substantive way with taking the oath, and that the minister of immigration does not, in any event, have the authority to summarily forbid wearing one. 

As you would expect from a judge at Boswell's level, his ruling was antiseptic, almost surgical.

He is uninterested in why Ishaq interprets her religion as an obligation to keep her face covered in public; it is enough that she does, in the same way that ultra-orthodox Jews feel obliged to wear black hats and side curls, or some Roman Catholics feel compelled to walk around with crosses daubed on their foreheads on Ash Wednesday.  
Zunera Ishaq following court ruling on Niqab

To take this to the Nth degree then, what the CBC's Neil Macdonald is saying is that we should then be able to say, do, wear and behave any way we want because as he says, and I quote, "... the decision of a grown woman, like Zunera Ishaq, to cover her face at a public ceremony is, well, the decision of a grown woman." 

This is a BS arguement twisting the facts to suit his (McDonald's) own bias. Just because you are 'grown up' means little other than you have reached the age of majority.  Age of majority does not necessarily equate, or equal, being able to have enough smarts to determine if something is right, or should be done

We do not have the right to do, say, wear and behave any way we want because we are grown women / men. 

Society will always impose restriction to those things based on the safety, security, and well-being of all.  There IS a difference between our democratic rights, and doing and saying whatever we want. 



No matter how you slice it, McDonald seems to have some serious issues he has yet to deal with, judging by everything he has written in this piece, especially when it comes to western religions, although all is fair when it comes to eastern ones. 

Why do I say this?  Because it appears Neil McDonald is fine with religious groups OTHER THAN Christians educating their children in the morals, background and history of their religious beliefs.  He appears however, to think Christians are dumbed down dinosaurs.

Why do I say that?  Well here's another quote from his so called analysis:


But then, indoctrinating children is how religions ensure their continuity. Society has accepted that religious parents have the right to impose religious practices on their children. The children have little say in the matter(Bold font added by me)


Bottom line for me? This is little more than the rantings of a windbag who should be ignored! 

I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops … care to hare your thoughts on this?




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

THE SIDEWINDER: MacDUFF'S NAIVE CALL

I have just struggled through Cheryl Ashlie's column ( MacDuff’s Call: A political novice with a sizeable ego ), in the Sept. 22 edition of The Maple Ridge News. To say the least, Ashlie's comments are naive and show just how totally out of touch she has become with political reality. Ashlie lauds the decision of Darryl Plecas to accept John Horgan's invitation to become the Speaker of the House, a move described by almost everyone else as self-serving and a betrayal of the trust of the constituents who voted for him. Ashlie claims Plecas' turncoat move will help provide good governance but in making this claim, she fails to explain how he will achieve this lofty goal.

Labels

Show more