Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Here’s my question to BC Conservative leader Dan Brooks; “Are you willing and prepared, to offer us that vision?”





While many existing members of the BC Conservative Party --- and others who have left --- are asking, “What relevance to British Columbian voters does the BC Conservative Party have?”, the party itself is now asking its members this question:

“Do you want to change the name of the Party; and if so, to what?”



An email has been sent to remaining members of the Party (that they still have up-to-date email addresses for, as well as a select number of former members, with the following message:


Memo to: Active and some expired members with a current email address



The possibility of a name change for the BC Conservative Party has been a discussion topic among members for a number of years. The Board of Directors decided in September to address this long standing issue by creating a committee to examine the feasibility of changing the Party name.



Party members Joan Robinson of Victoria and Frank Dubenski of Qualicum Beach have volunteered to coordinate the process.



The goals of the Name Change Committee are to determine the viability of a name change and to solicit new name suggestions from the Party membership. The committee will be reporting its findings and recommendations to the Board of Directors. Depending on the committee's recommendations, the Board may decide to have the matter considered at the February AGM.



These are some of the political party names that cannot be used:

BC Vision            

BC Excalibur         

British Columbia Party

BC First                

Libertarian             

Christian Heritage Party

BC Marijuana      

People's Front      

Land Air Water Party

BC Action            

Platinum Party      

Unparty: The Consensus Building Party

BC Refederation  

Work Less Party  

Vancouver Island Party of British Columbia

BC Reform            

Peoples Party       

Your Political Party

Unity Party            

Communist Party  

Social Credit Party

Youth Coalition    

Freedom Party      

Democratic Futures

Individual Rights  

Party of Citizens   

Renewal Party

Please submit your ideas by clicking on the "Name change suggestions" link that is underlined below.








Clicking on the link gives members the opportunity to say “Yes” or “No” to changing the Party name … the chance to offer their suggestions … and then indicate whether or not they are a member of the BC Conservatives.



Here’s a reality check for the Board, Executive, and Leader of the BC Conservatives … whether the name changes or not is immaterial; the membership, and better yet the people of BC, what to know what the party stands for!






  • What stand has the Party taken with regards to issues important to the men and women of this province? 
  • What stand does the party take on providing safe and affordable transportation to the people of Prince George to Prince Rupert to get to appointments, to get to medical attention, to meet and visit with family and friends?  Have they come up with ideas and suggestions that can be presented to the public and the media? 
  • Where are we going to get the desperately needed doctors and health care practitioners, for the hundreds of thousands of British Columbian women, men, and children who no longer one?
  • Where does the Party stand on Justin Trudeau’s declaration that tankers won’t ply west coast waters to get fossil fuels transported to world-wide markets?
  • What role does the party see for traditional jobs (mining, logging, fishing, ranching) that have fed the BC economy for decade after decade?
  • What about Freedom of Information requests that go unanswered … and government emails that get deleted?
  • How are the young people of British Columbia going to be trained for the new economy of the future?

 
And with news just today, what is the BC Conservative response to the fact that Independent MLA Vicki Huntington has come up against a stone wall in trying to find out information on why the only choice to replace the Massey Tunnel is a new bridge?



British Columbians are not going to be attracted to the BC Conservatives without strong reasons to do so --- and that DOES NOT by any stretch of the imagination include a change of name!



And so the real question that needs to be asked is, “What polices are the BC Conservatives proposing that will catch fire with people from one end of the province to the other … whether they live in urban metro areas, the suburbs, or the rural parts of BC.



At meetings over the last two days in Vancouver a quote from auto-maker Henry Ford was shared.  He said, “If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.”



The leadership of the BC Conservatives need to know what British Columbians want (a faster horse), so that they can develope policy for the people of BC that fits with their own ideals and principles (a vision for change).  More importantly however, the people of BC need a vision of what the future can be, under a government led by the BC Conservative Party.



Here’s my question to BC Conservative leader Dan Brooks; “Are you willing and prepared, to offer us that vision?”



Sitting at the Vancouver International Airport, waiting for a flight back home to Kamloops, these are the thoughts that are going through my mind. 


I'm Alan Forseth, and I'd love to know what you think.

Comments

  1. A name change will not save this party!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good comments and the one comment above says it all. We had a constitutional meeting the results which has divided the party. The unelected executive reinstated expelled members and commented that the executive who expelled the members should not have done so. This drove hard working members away from the party. And finally the unelected executives latest brain wave is to see if there is any enthusiasm for a name change. I ask this do any British Columbians really give a dam about those three things. Or are British Columbians looking for visionary policies from a political party so they can consider supporting that party? This Executive and leader unfortunately are unable to deliver relevant objectives that the public can
    show any interest in at all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The time for a name change sailed away a long time ago now. That should have been acted on shortly after the 2013 election. The party is run by a one man show everyone else just says yes sir. Mr Brooks can not compete against Chriaty. Under the current leadership our party is finished. We need new wind in our sails and some political experiance. If this were house with a small leak in the roof we could fix it, but it is not a small leak it is more like a torrential downpour pour. Time to tear down and rebuild from the ground up or join another party and do our best to bring life to.them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more