Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

I realize I have sealed my fate as a dissident, and my membership in the BC Conservative Party will not be allowed



If you recall, I quit the BC Conservative Party this past Spring, following the Executive and Board of the BC Conservative Party offering an apology to Alison Paton and company, and re-instatement of their memberships. Their carefully planned sabotage of the party, timely due to the closeness of the election, led to damage the Conservatives were never able to recover from in time for the May 2013 election.  As has been stated here, and elsewhere, it was sabotage plain and simple.



What was the result of their dissension?  Not one single BC Conservative candidate was elected!



I have been vocal, and public, in my comments about the party since asking for my membership to be removed.  I was not alone in this; I was simply public about it.  Other members simply disengaged and walked away in disgust at the lack of direction, or failed to renew their memberships.



So, let’s have a quick recap.


  1. I quit because of the actions of the board in renewing the memberships of dissidents (who had been removed by a legally constituted board) 
  2.  I then several months later began to question the actions of the leadership of the party, and what appeared to be a lack of direction 
  3.  I was then, myself, branded as a dissident



What that means is that the Board and Executive of the BC Conservative Party gets to vote and decide, whether or not I will be allowed to have my membership approved.  The very same board that welcomed Alison Paton and company back into the Conservatives, AND apologized for kicking them out, for just cause.



How does that make sense?



Let me be honest.  I questioned for many months whether the party was salvageable, or whether an existing dormant party (such as BC Reform), or a brand new party, was the answer.  This was not a quick process, however in the end I came to believe the Conservatives could indeed be reinvigorated with the return of the many people who had left.  These included many who did have the knowledge and skills needed to build a credible party.



The sad fact is that top people, with much needed political skills, left disgusted at what remained of the party. Nearly every candidate that ran in 2013 no longer is involved … little if anything is coming in from member donations … there is no media presence (and the media has no interest in the party because there is nothing to report on) … and there is no call to members to engage and be involved.




The Board and Executive of the BC Conservative Party was to decide my fate, as to whether or not I was going to be allowed to have my membership re-instated, last week.  Several emails from me over the weekend finally resulted in a response that they would decide by early December.  I replied back it was to be decided last week, and that I would like a response, one way or the other, by mid-week.  Two more emails yesterday (Wednesday), and another today (Thursday) has resulted in no reply from Party Leader Dan Brooks, or the area Regional Director.  They, and the Party, have been silent.



Call me a dissident if you want; maybe I am.  What it has meant though is the party is dragging its’ heels in trying to decide whether to allow me to have a membership.



If indeed I am a dissident, then I will gladly wear the title because a rebirth of the BC Conservative Party will only come about if the few left within, and those from without, decide they are willing to rebuild … from the GRASSROOTS.



In posting this commentary, I realize I have sealed my fate as a dissident, and my membership in the BC Conservative Party will not be allowed.  Sadly, so be it.  Perhaps when the party does finally hold its’ AGM, a new board, with a vision for the future will be elected.



The next Provincial Election is in May 2017 – just a short 17 and a half months from now.  The question to be asked is, “Will the BC Conservative Party have any kind of a campaign to be taken seriously … and better yet, who will even want to run as a candidate?”

Time is short, but it is not too late.  That said, does anyone care anymore?



In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth, and I look forward to hearing what you have to say.

Comments

  1. Well,Alan,I think you have your answer as to whether this party can be renewed. I still maintain that with the present leadership,it is impossible. I think we need to look elsewhere for a truly democractic conservative party in BC.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Alan. I am very surprised to read your comments. I know you as a sincere and honest person. I also know that your input and time have always been intended to make this party stronger. If the party does not re-instate your membership, I an seriously thinking of cancelling mine. What a mess!
    Fred Bosman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Fred ... thank you for your comment, and your concerns. At this point, I believe the party needs to have its remaining members stay on board, and through action at the next AGM fully vet, and elect, a Board of Directors / Executive that has the resolve to get the job done. Hopefully, at that point, I can be welcomed back :)

      Take care my friend, and thanks again for your comments

      Delete
  3. That is what we all want, Alan. There has been too much infighting and dissension in the party since before the last election. We need all BC conservatives to unite and form a strong party. Your input should always be welcomed, as should everyone's. We can build this party and we need to do it soon.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Alan, your opinions have always been important and valued by Bob and myself.
    We would welcome you back yesterday if possible. Your friend - Sue Brown

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more