Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

But this is just one of the issues surrounding free, and not so free, interprovincial trade


In December 2014, federal, provincial and territorial governments began negotiations to strengthen and modernize the Agreement on Internal Trade – which last year (July 1st, 2017) resulted in the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA). This agreement covers most of the service economy, which accounts for 70 per cent of Canada’s GDP.

It also committed provincial governments to a comprehensive set of rules … ones which applied to almost all areas of economic activity in Canada, and exceptions were clearly identified.  The changes were also looked upon as opportunity to enhance innovation in the sharing economy, and clean technologies … all designed to promote Canada’s long-term economic development.

In advance of tomorrows gathering of Premiers, and the federal government led by Justin Trudeau, things seem a little fragile.

Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister is urging the federal Liberal government, of Justin Trudeau, to take concrete steps to end internal trade barriers and restrictions within its own control.

Internal trade barriers are a pocket book issue for every Canadian.  They cost approximately $1,500 per family every year.  These barriers need to end and they need to end quickly,” said Pallister.  “Canada is an economic union and free trade is critical to our prosperity.  But markets and investors need certainty.”

Premiers of all provinces and territories have already prioritized meaningful work on trade barrier reduction in provincial areas such as alcohol, occupational health and safety, transportation and business registration.  This work is being led by Manitoba and Nova Scotia, and progress is being made.  Manitoba currently has no personal use limits for alcohol crossing its boundaries and recently became the first province to adopt a new national standard for occupational health and safety equipment.

Checking with David Eby’s Ministry of the Attorney General, specifically around the area of BC manufactured wines and spirits which seems to crop up regularly as an area of concern, I was told:

The Liquor Distribution Branch (LDB) does not classify non-B.C. products by the province of origin. For example, beer brewed in other provinces is classified as “Domestic – Other Province Beer.”


Furthermore, the spokesperson for the BC AG’s Ministry stated:
All manufacturers that wish to sell product in B.C. must have it registered with the Liquor Distribution Branch (LDB). Once a product is registered, it is available for purchase via wholesale by individual Licensee Retail Stores (private liquor stores) or government BC Liquor Stores.”

Meantime next door in Alberta, Rachael Notley’s NDP government is launching a trade challenge against Ontario over unfair liquor policies that prevent Alberta manufacturers from accessing the Ontario market.  Apparently, Alberta lists 3,700 products from other parts of Canada … including 745 from Ontario. By contrast, according to the Alberta government, Ontario imports only about 20 Alberta products despite their market being three times as large.

According to Deron Bilous, Minister of Economic Development & Trade:
It doesn’t make any sense that it’s easier to sell Alberta beer in Tokyo than it is in Toronto. It’s unacceptable.”

Bilous continued, “We’re fighting for the Alberta craft liquor manufacturers who create good jobs here in our province. They deserve a level playing field to sell their products across the country, without unfair trade barriers. We need more trade, not less.”

Back home in BC, I was reminded of the recent spate between BC and Alberta, and asked for comment:

There was a dispute between BC and Alberta, which was launched on February 6th, when Alberta Premier Rachel Notley announced her government was boycotting all imports of BC wines”, a spokesperson stated.

BC launched a formal complaint against Alberta on February 19 of this year, because the government believed Alberta’s action violated numerous provisions of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement.

Alberta suspended its boycott against provincial wines on the 22nd of February, and we continue to monitor the situation”.

That said, the BC Craft Brewers guild has expressed concerns about changes in 2016 made by Alberta, related to tax levels on out of province craft beer manufacturers.  Ken Beattie, Executive Director of the BC Craft Brewers Guild informed me that previous to the changes small BC craft brewers paid a 10-cent mark-up.  That changed to $1.25 for all product being sold in Alberta, regardless of where is was brewed … this, to stimulate the growth of Alberta breweries. 

This was challenged in court however as the Alberta government then provided subsidies to their breweries to reduce the cost back down to the 10-cent mark.

According to Notley, We have spent a long time here in Alberta supporting the liquor industries of other provinces, and it’s about time that we stand up for Alberta producers and the workers who are working in this province.”

That did not pass musters as multiple legal challenges failed, including a $100 million-dollar lawsuit filed on behalf of out-of-province craft brewers over losses they suffered due to the Alberta subsidy program.


According to Pallister, “The federal government needs to demonstrate leadership on resolving issues within their own areas of responsibility”.

He then continued, “Bill C-69 also confirms Ottawa doesn’t fully understand the tremendous negative impact of additional regulatory burdens.  Whether it’s a pipeline, a transmission line or a flood relief project, we can’t lose sight of the need for certainty and the importance of secure market access.”

That sets up a fight tomorrow between Ontario Premier Doug Ford, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, Alberta Premier Rachael Notley, and New Brunswick’s Blaine Higgs over the implementation of Carbon Taxes by the Trudeau government … as well as the crisis facing the oil producing provinces, inaction on getting pipelines approved and as Pallister was saying, Bill C-69.

Trudeau seems hell-bent on not making these topics of specific discussion tomorrow … the Premiers insist they will be.  Stay tuned … we’ll see how this plays out in the early hours of tomorrow.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.  If you have any thoughts on this, I hope you will share them directly below in the Comments Section.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PEATS: I am writing with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community

The following is a copy of a letter sent to me, which was sent to BC’s Minister of Health Adrian Dix. It is with regards to the impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic in Dawson Creek.   Dear Minister,   I am writing to you today with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community. The closure, scheduled for the summer of 2024, is a result of the utterly burdensome terms and conditions imposed by the bureaucratic Northern Health. As a result, Dawson Creek stands to lose four doctors who have made this city their home, and who wish to continue serving the people of our community.   The impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic is a significant blow to our city. Not only will it result in the loss of highly qualified and dedicated healthcare professionals, but it will also deprive thousands of Dawson Creek residents of access to their primary physicians. At a time when healthcare se

Selina Robinson: "You broke my heart . . ." (The Real Story)

The mildly Zionist, innocuously leftish and now ousted advanced education minister’s letter to her New Democratic Party caucus colleagues, explaining why she has resigned the caucus to sit as an independent. The letter is an historic document, an artifact of the disgraceful cultural moment we’re living through. It’s important. It’s also a scorcher. It’s gathering a heck of a lot of attention . I’m printing it in full here. I’ve been insisting that what happened to Robinson is a much bigger deal and a completely different story than the one we’d all been led to believe. The necessary background: My piece in the National Post: The despicable untruths behind Selina Robinson's political lynching . More importantly , a Real Story investigation: The Problem With The Selina Robinson Story. . . It wasn't true. What follows is the story of what really happened. Let’s just get into it. Apart from punctuation and spelling I replicate the letter faithfully, with some further comm

Long-time former BC Liberal supporter says, I am definitely not hanging in there with BC United

                              BC United leader Kevin Falcon I recently asked a political acquaintance of mine, about their current involvement with BC United.   I was much surprised with the response given the BC Liberals had been the recipient of a lot of their time and energy in the past. By request, their comments are posted anonymously : I am definitely not hanging in there with BC United. Kevin’s poor judgement in ousting John Rustad from Caucus, and then publicly humiliating him, might be the most inept thing I have seen in BC politics ... and I’ve been involved in BC politics for a number of years! I still think the impetus was John‘s involvement in the Ellis Ross leadership campaign for the BC Liberal Party, and how successful and respected (despite not winning) it was. I am uncertain about the tenor of the current Conservative movement in North America. The once proud Republican Party in the United States has allowed itself to be led by a person who is morally, intell

Labels

Show more