Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: It’s hard to be a progressive … or … tossing money at this, putting a band-aid on that, and creating a new program (to distract from long-standing problems) is not working


These days it seems that many people, in particular younger people, no longer gravitate to traditional political parties. They think of themselves as ‘progressives’ and favour changing of our traditions, values and society in general.  If you inquire about what they stand for, they use the term progress.

I have nothing against progress. I have little desire to return to carrying water from a well, using kerosene lamps including maintaining the darn things, outhouses, scrubbing boards, houses with little or no insulation, wood stoves and many other things I grew up with.

However, progress requires a few things that progressives lack:

  1. Before we can move forward you have to understand where we are, and how we got there … we did not suddenly reach adulthood out of nowhere. We have a history, and have achievements and accomplishments, made over time
  2. As a society we have made many poor decisions. We have to know what they were, and what the results were, to avoid the same traps in future 
  3. We need some world experience, to make our own mistakes, and hopefully learn from them. Life is unpredictable and capricious. Whatever plans we have must consider illness, injury, demotions, job losses, natural catastrophes and other elements that can knock our plans sideways 
  4. We need practical experience with cause and effect. If we do “A” what results can we anticipate, and what are the results of a worst-case scenario. We need a plan “B” if things don’t work out as expected.


Progress does not well up out of thin air. You have to have some specific objectives and a plan to meet those objectives. It is called strategic planning and is in common use. We begin by establishing who we are and how we got here. That is not all that easy. Most of us don’t employ honest self-evaluation of ourselves, or our organizations.


Once we know who and what we are, we consider what we want to be. That is the easy part, but it will undergo a lot of change as we proceed.

The we need to map out a plan for getting from where we are, to where we want to be. What specific steps do we need to take to achieve our goals?

Whatever we are, we use resources – a facility, equipment, financing, manpower and management to list some. Now we have to look at how much of those resources we can free up to work on meeting our goals. That’s where the going gets sticky as we have to assign resources to each step we mapped out. It is where our goals start to shrink as we don’t have the resources to accomplish them all.  The result?  We need to make some hard decisions as to which are most important.

I don’t see much strategic planning by governments at any level. They seem to be swimming in a sea of ever-changing demands and choose objectives randomly. We have numerous problems that have been problems for decades. Tossing money at this, putting a band-aid on that, and creating a new program (to distract from long-standing problems) is not working.

We can’t wish our way to progress – it takes hard work and planning. Progressive too often stands for change, but change alone is inadequate to meet our needs. Change without an objective and direction is meaningless, empty, and unsatisfying. We have had many changes thrust on us recently, but those changes have increased, rather than diminished, social dissatisfaction and unrest.

That indicates we are on the wrong path.    

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a

Labels

Show more