Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED: Taking a road less travelled. Saving jobs is a side issue – a ‘red herring’; not a justification for unlawful interference in the judicial process.

The saddest part about the unravelling SNC-Lavalin scandal is how shocked we are when an honest and ethical member of the government refuses to be bullied and stands up for the rule of law and good government. Very few of us realized how far we have fallen from the basic principles honest and open democratic governance. We presumed that our government obeyed the law. Apparently not so.

We have grumbled about government favouritism to central Canada, but we have never been confronted with obvious favouritism that goes far beyond favours for friends and crosses the lines of ethical, equal and legal treatment of all Canadians.

Our democracy has been hijacked by political parties who have no interest in good government. Their focus in on acquiring and maintaining political power. As a consequence, every decision made by the government in power is weighed in the balance of electability – will this decision garner votes or lose us votes in an election? Can the decision be modified to give us a better result?

Governing based on electability naturally gives an advantage to our most heavily populated areas. That is why auto worker jobs in Ontario, and construction jobs in Quebec, gain the attention of the federal government while jobs in our fisheries, forestry and petroleum sectors are considered collateral damage unworthy of special attention because the political fallout is manageable.

Watching Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on TV last night, speaking after Jody Wilson-Raybould testified before the Commons Justice Committee, was painful. He disagreed with her assessment of being under intense pressure to interfere in SNC-Lavalin prosecutions. We don’t care if he ‘disagrees’. That is not the issue. Did he and his senior staff try to coerce Wilson-Raybould to interfere in the SNC-Lavalin prosecution or not? Saving jobs is a side issue – a ‘red herring’; not a justification for unlawful interference in the judicial process.

In his next statement, Prime Minister Trudeau answered the question by stating that his government had an obligation to save jobs and maintain the economy. In his mind that allows the PMO to try to convince Wilson-Raybould to interfere in a prosecution which is unlawful. Worse than his splitting hairs to justify unethical actions, his is not consistent. If a government has an obligation to protect jobs, he cannot explain why preserving jobs in the oil patch was not a government priority.

The government has no business interfering in private enterprise. The government’s job is to create an economic environment that encourages private sector investment and for business and industry to locate and thrive in Canada. Government interference in private enterprise has the opposite effect by creating a two-tier business environment where the playing field is not level and investors are wary.

Not many years ago, SNC-Lavalin could not secure major contracts through its offices in Calgary because local governments would not accept the bribery common in Quebec contracting. That speaks to the dangers of government interference in business rather than ensuring the playing field is the same everywhere in the nation.

One thing about the whole SNC-Lavalin affair that sticks out sharply is that our government shows no concern for the contractors who bid on contracts SNC-Lavalin won through bribery. What about their business losses due to unlawful activities sanctioned by government? What about the jobs lost to those contractors?

Choosing, or taking, a road less traveled
Prime Minister Trudeau has taken advantage of a system that lacks the checks and balances that ensure that governments act ethically and lawfully. We must ensure that the PMO, and Parliament, are restructured to prevent recurrence under any government. Some things that must change:

... the Senate must be depoliticized and follow the constitution which has representatives divided by region (Atlantic, Quebec, Ontario & West) not by political affiliation;

... we must reinstate the Executive, which consists of the Governor General acting on behalf of the Queen, supported by a non-political Privy Council Office that acts as a resource and counsel to the Governor General.  Additionally, we need to divide the offices of the Attorney General and Justice Minister. The Attorney General cannot participate in Cabinet discussions without compromising the position and the Justice Minister prides assistance and advice to Cabinet and cannot deal with Justice Department issues and matters;

After that, we need to implement and enforce strict rules that prohibit political parties from influencing elected members in any way, and stop all ‘whipped’ votes in the Commons. All MPs must be free to vote on any issue in accordance with their understanding of the issues and in the interests of the people they represent;

We need to eliminate “omnibus bills” that make changes to two or more major pieces of legislation to escape scrutiny of the changes by the appropriate House standing committees.

As called for by a number of provinces, we need to amend and simplify the Equalization formula calculation. Its complexity invites abuse. Cheats and crooks are good at figuring out how to beat the system.

Additionally, we need to rescind the Official Languages Act. Most of its key elements were incorporated into the 1982 amendments to the Constitution, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. We do not need a commissioner dictating what government positions must be bilingual. Civil service promotions must be merit based. Providing services in both languages is a service level activity, not a management requirement.

And finally, we need to rescind the Canadian Multiculturalism Act. We managed to get along without government guidance for 121 years before this travesty was introduced and settled differences without bloodshed. We do not need to be told how to respect one another.    

All of the above can be accomplished without constitutional changes. All of these issues are covered in various pieces of legislation the government created and can amend. 

John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a


Show more