Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

While the BC government states that, removing impediments to trade create a safer and more dependable business environment for investors, interprovincial trade remains tangled in protectionism

In just 29 words (Constitution Act Section 121) the Fathers of Confederation managed to state that:
 "All Articles of the Growth, Produce, or Manufacture of any one of the Provinces shall, from and after the Union, be admitted free into each of the other Provinces."

And as the Huffington Post commented:
How beautifully succinct; how pellucidly clear. No need for clumsy jargon about "growing the economy," gauzy "visions for promoting trade," or cross-fingered promises of "working groups" to "explore opportunities." And the best part: it's already part of the supreme law of the land.

Year after year after year however, both provincial and federal politicians have huffed and puffed about removing inter-provincial trade barriers.  Still 150 years later we have yet to see, or find, one news story announcing an end to these barriers.

We in Canada’s two most westerly provinces (British Columbia and Alberta) approve by a majority of over 60% the removal of barriers to freer trade between provinces ... not surprisingly, protectionist Quebec has residents at the lowest end, with just 43% agreeing to lowering of trade restrictions.  The +60% figure for British Columbia makes sense given we are
a trading province, and as the BC government stated last September, this is especially important considering that about 40% of Canada’s trade takes place within its own borders.

Two stories from CBC News seemed to capture things rather succinctly however, when it comes to the lack of headway on breaking down barriers:

Canadians, after all, can't be allowed to just run around Canada willy-nilly, buying whatever they want ... is there any economic good in them (our interprovincial trade barriers) ... "No. The answer is no." (Daniel Schwanen, at the C.D. Howe Institute)

CBC NEWS ... July 16th, 2018
Everyone loves to talk about interprovincial trade - but tangible progress is scarce ... all the provincial and territorial trade ministers were given a symbolic pair of golden scissors to remind them to start cutting interprovincial trade barriers ... the trouble is, they aren't using them.

So, what is happening? 

Not a damn thing really.

While the federal government continues to work on negotiating international free trade agreements ... we have yet to see headway being made here in our own country.  That, despite agreement that it needs to happen.  Here in British Columbia a government news story from last fall (Sept 10th) indicated that:

“Improving the flow of goods and services helps to create a strong and diverse economy, allowing B.C. companies to grow their business and create good jobs and opportunities in every corner of the province.

Still, just two and a half months ago the Vancouver Sun brought us this ridiculous statement
... examples of Canadian companies finding it easier to import goods and services internationally than trading with their neighbouring provinces are far too plentiful — and frequently absurd ...

Someone however, seems to be attempting to restart discussions on freer inter-provincial trade.

At the end of February, Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister commented on the tremendous cost of internal trade barriers to the economy and to households across Canada, and called for a grand bargain to bring collaborative action in the national interest.

Our commitment to a national vision has eroded over the past few decades.  We have taken some small positive steps but we need to think bigger and move faster,” Pallister said.  “We need leadership in order to rediscover the blueprint for Confederation.”

In his release to the media, Pallister commented that he has sent a letter to fellow premiers seeking their support for a proposal to address two of the most important issues before Canadians:  sustainable and predictable federal support for health care, and reduction of inter-provincial trade barriers.

I am proposing that we seek a commitment for stable federal health-care funding in return for our support for federal legislation establishing a Canadian economic union,” said Pallister. 

Most Canadians will be surprised to learn just how much the tangle of red tape, that ties up free trade between provinces, costs each and everyone of us.  According to Pallister, “... trade barriers cost Canadians the equivalent of a seven per cent sales tax.”

Pallister noted that while our premiers have ... recently made some modest progress on reducing trade barriers, we need to think much bigger in order to achieve the real results we all desire.

Reaction from the BC government, and in particular Minister Bruce Ralston’s Ministry of Trade, Jobs, and Technology, regrettably is not forthcoming on this topic. 

Hoping to see where the BC government is on taking down barriers, and perhaps getting a response to Premier Pallister's recent remarks, I commented to his Ministry:

The issue of trade across provincial borders seems to come up on a fairly regular basis, and so I am wondering what specific steps the BC government is taking to try and have rules, regulations, and red-tape reduced so that freer trade across Canada is available, and to make it easier for Canadian producers and manufacturers have better opportunity to sell to our own citizens.

The answer I received was, “Unfortunately, we don’t have anything we can share on this at this time.”

I honestly do not know if I was being told that Ralston’s Ministry actually did indeed have no information on the topic, or instead that they were unable to provide answers to what I requested. 

They are, in my opinion, indeed two separate things.  That said, I have to believe work is being done not only by our government in BC ... but across the country on this topic.  Either that, or Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister’s words are falling on deaf ears, at least here in BC.

He is stating that there needs to be discussions and proposals for federal legislation to establish the principle of free flow of goods and services within Canada. 

Furthermore, he believes that while provinces would retain the ultimate responsibility for removing barriers that fall under exclusive provincial jurisdiction, federal legislation would empower Canadians to challenge all barriers that obstruct their right to buy, sell, work and invest in every part of Canada.

The grand bargain we envision with the federal government would allow us to pursue real nation building,” said Pallister. 

He also remarked he was looking forward to hearing the thoughts and feedback of his provincial and territorial colleagues on the topic. 

Hopefully he’ll have better luck than I, as a British Columbian, did when asking that very thing of my own government

As Brian Lee Crowley, managing director at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute said, “(Brian Pallister) is issuing a constructive challenge to his fellow premiers to move beyond entrenched positions and work together to make progress on two issues that matter enormously to Canadians.  That’s leadership.”

And as a story from Macleans magazine last October observed ... a solid majority of Canadians wants to see those impediments to the free flow of goods and services inside the country eliminated ... inter-provincial trade barriers should be scrapped because they “restrict choice and competitiveness in Canada’s consumer markets ...

And finally, I do indeed hope to hear back from the BC government on what is being done with regards to making inter-provincial trade between provinces easier – it’s an important topic – one that while help grow the economy, create more jobs, and save with reduced costs for each of us.

I look forward to clarity on their answer ... and a reconsideration of providing a response on this topic.

I’m Alan Forseth in Kamloops.  Please take a moment to share any thoughts you have on this commentary in the Comment Section below.  And as always, I encourage you to pass this on to any you feel may be interested.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a


Show more