Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Judy Darcy is wrong for a number of reasons, and if those reasons are not recognized, their efforts to create a Framework for Accessibility Legislation will fail dismally

BC NDP Premier John Horgan

The government of British Columbia has stated it is committed to accessibility legislation that meets the unique needs of British Columbians and will also seek to learn from the experiences of provinces that have legislation in place already.

I for one however do not believe that new legislation, when enacted, will meet the needs of one segment of our provinces citizens.  This despite the apparent goal(s) of BC Premier John Horgan who said:

... our government is putting British Columbians first. We are focused on creating opportunities for people now, while also meeting the challenges of tomorrow.

Accessibility for all British Columbians, including persons with disabilities, means full and equal participation in our communities, with the physical, information, attitudinal and systemic barriers removed so people can participate in day-to-day activities, or take part in opportunities that are available to all citizens.

Accessibility legislation will help build an inclusive British Columbia that cares for and protects all British Columbians for generations to come.

Your feedback and input into the Framework for Accessibility Legislation will help our government develop laws, standards and policies, which will support people with disabilities to be truly included in the life of their communities ...

Sadly however, it appears the right hand doesn’t know what the left is doing, when it comes to the Premier, his Ministers, and their Ministries.

On August 9th I contacted the Honourable Judy Darcy (Minister of Mental Health and Addictions) with concerns surrounding assistance dogs.  Now for clarity, emotional and support dogs ARE NOT the same as a Service Dog.  These animals have specifics needs they are trained for assisting those with blindness, hearing loss, etc.

My email, to her, indicated that ... we need to have a change to recognize the importance of Support Dogs, for those impacted by, and diagnosed with, depression, anxiety, and stress.

It also asked that she ... consider what you might be able to do to assist in changes being made to the Guide Dog and Service Dog Act [SBC 2015] CHAPTER 17.

Continuing my email went on to say:

I, like many others, have a dog that is used for support against re-occurring problems around depression, anxiety, and stress.

Because he has not been officially trained at an authorized center (cost $15 to $20+ thousand dollars) he doesn't qualify.  However it should be noted that dogs costing $15 to 20+ thousand are used for different purposes, and therefore do indeed cost large amounts of money for their training.

A dog like Finnegan (a 4 pound purebred MiKi) on the other hand is for emotional support --- and brings a calming influence to me, and thousands of others, when depression, anxiety, and stress may strike.

While there is a document that can be filled out by a doctor or medical nurse practitioner (for those dogs without the 15 to 20 thousand dollar cost ( it FAILS to recognize the needs of those suffering from depression, anxiety and stress (see attached image from form) -- an obvious human rights violation.

There is a need for me (and heaven knows how many others) to have a dog for support --- it has been recognized and recommended by a qualified government recognized medical practitioner, and yet these need is not being filled through government licensing.

Hopefully you will be able to see the importance and need of see this to change, and perhaps you can lead the charge?

Mental Health & Addictions
Minister Judy Darcy

Two days ago, I received a response from the Minister, in which she stated to me:

“I appreciate you reaching out and sharing with me your concerns regarding changes to the Guide Dog and Service Dog Act (the Act) and impact that the Act has had on you personally ...

Specific to your concerns, the Guide Dog and Service Dog Act certification does not apply to emotional support or therapy dogs as they do not necessarily perform specific tasks to assist with daily living.” 

She they went on to say that, “... emotional support animals are not covered under the Act. However, that does not detract from the positive impact he has on your life, and I hope he continues to bring you comfort in times of need.”

Then she went on to say, “The Guide Dog and Service Dog Act is intended to complement the BC Human Rights Code, it does not affect rights which exist under the Code” ... and then concluded with these words:

I hope you and Finnegan are able to find a solution that works to meet your needs.”

I want to be clear that she is wrong ... and wrong for a number of reasons, and if those reasons are not recognized, then their efforts to create a Framework for Accessibility Legislation will FAIL DISMALLY!

I say this not only because Emotional Support dog do unquestionably perform specific tasks to assist with daily living ... but also because of the Accessible Canada Act.

... a disability is defined as any impairment, including a physical, mental, intellectual, cognitive, learning, communication or sensory impairment — or a functional limitation — whether permanent, temporary or episodic in nature, or evident or not, that, in interaction with a barrier, hinders a person’s full and equal participation in society.

It also quotes the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ... disability is described as an evolving concept which results from the interaction between persons with impairments and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinders their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others.

Then, page 20 of the BC governments ‘Framework’ document says the principles that guide the development and implementation of accessibility legislation could include ... all British Columbians, including persons with disabilities, being able to participate fully and equally in their communities.

Mental Health and Addictions Minister Judy Darcy basically indicated to me that issues I was having regarding an Emotion Support dog, rather than a Service Dog, did not contravene the Human Rights Code.


Under the section 3, “Purposes”, the BC Human Rights Code (current as of September 25th, 2019) states it is to:
(a) to foster a society in British Columbia in which there are no impediments to full and free participation in the economic, social, political and cultural life of British Columbia;

Under section 8, ‘Discrimination in accommodation, service and facility”, it states that a person must not, without a bona fide and reasonable justification,
(a) deny to a person or class of persons any accommodation, service or facility customarily available to the public, or
(b) discriminate against a person or class of persons regarding any accommodation, service or facility customarily available to the public

FURTHERMORE, several areas of Canada’s Bill C-81 would disagree with her assessment given the following information from the bill itself:

... (the act is to) enhance the full and equal participation of all persons, especially persons with disabilities, in society. This is to be achieved through the realization, within the purview of matters coming within the legislative authority of Parliament, of a Canada without barriers, particularly by the identification, removal and prevention of barriers

... the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, discrimination on the basis of disability

... the Canadian Human Rights Act recognizes that all individuals should have an opportunity equal with other individuals to make for themselves the lives that they are able and wish to have and to have their needs accommodated without discrimination and, in particular, discrimination on the basis of disability

... barrier means anything — including anything physical, architectural, technological or attitudinal, anything that is based on information or communications or anything that is the result of a policy or a practice — that hinders the full and equal participation in society of persons with an impairment, including a physical, mental, intellectual, cognitive, learning, communication or sensory impairment or a functional limitation. (obstacle)

This Act is to be carried out in recognition of, and in accordance with, the following principles (under section 6):
(a) all persons must be treated with dignity regardless of their disabilities;
(c) all persons must have barrier-free access to full and equal participation in society, regardless of their disabilities;
(e) laws, policies, programs, services and structures must take into account the disabilities of persons, the different ways that persons interact with their environments and the multiple and intersecting forms of marginalization and discrimination faced by persons;

AND SHE IS STILL WRONG, given equality rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  Section 15 makes it clear that every individual in Canada regardless of race, religion, national or ethnic origin, colour, sex, age or physical or mental disability – is to be treated with the same respect, dignity and consideration. This means that governments must not discriminate on any of these grounds in its laws or programs.

It is clear (based on the BC Human Rights Code, Canada’s Bill C-81, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms), that individuals with any combination of medically recognized depression, stress, and anxiety cannot, and should not, be discriminated against by anyone – including through policies and legislation of the government. 

Having a ‘registered service dog’ should NOT be a requirement for, as the BC government itself has stated, being able to participate fully and equally in their communities

The BC government must ensure there is respect for the rights of all individuals, something not currently being done under the Guide Dog and Service Dog Act

With that in mind, it is time to begin a process to put policies in place -- which will  recognize ‘emotional support dogs’ -- for those of us with ‘hidden’ disabilities such as stress, anxiety, and depression. Respect for human dignity requires nothing less.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more