Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ROTHENBURGER – There’s nothing wrong with being disinterested in politics, or not paying attention to an election campaign, but there is in blindly marking an ‘X’ on a ballot


Reprinted with permission of the author, Mel Rothenburger. Mel’s commentaries are also published in CFJC Today

FIRST THING MONDAY MORNING, I’m going to get up and drive to my designated polling station. It’s a small polling station; very few people vote there so it likely won’t be crowded.


It will take only a few minutes to check in, mark my ballot and put it in the box. It will, however, take me more than half an hour to drive from home to the station and back.

How much simpler and easier it would be to vote online, to mail in a ballot, or even to vote in advance at one of the other polling places.

It bugs me when people say we have to find easier ways for people to vote because that’s the only way we can increase the turnout. I don’t believe it.

Democracy shouldn’t be run from the comfort of our own homes; it should require at least a minimum of physical activity. If we no longer have the energy to go out to a polling booth to mark a ballot, we’re definitely in trouble.

Of course, accommodations have to be made for medical-facility shut-ins and so on, but the rest of us should be committed enough to our country, and thankful enough of the opportunity, to go park near a polling station and even stand in line for a while if that’s what it takes.

There’s a feeling of community at the polling station. It feels good to vote there, in a way you could never get voting on your home computer. The experience makes you proud to be a Canadian.

There were quite a few complaints about confusion and lineups at the advance polls. A lot of people got through it quickly but a lot didn’t. Some complained about the grumpy Elections Canada people.


Voting shouldn’t be a frustration but, as others said in rebuttal, we should be happy we live in a country where we have a say in who runs the place. If it involves slow lineups and grouchy polling staff, so be it. It’s all part of the experience.

Those temporary staff must go blind looking at lists and checking ID, and no doubt get impatient after a while. Yet, for the most part I’ve found them cheerful and helpful.

By the way, I’ve never been an advocate for the old “vote as you wish but please vote” approach. If you haven’t paid much attention to the campaign, don’t know any of the party policies, have never heard of some of the candidates and haven’t tried to find out, then stay home. Enjoy that couch.


Ideally, of course, everyone would be well up to speed. If you don’t vote, you’re leaving the decision up to everybody else. We all know people who are actually proud of not voting. They see it as their way of rebelling against a system they see as corrupt.

That’s not a good reason not to vote, nor is it a good reason not to take part by studying parties and platforms. There’s the old saying that we get the kind of government we deserve.

I’ve reserved my decision on who to vote for until the campaign ends but I know now which way I’m leaning. More than any past election, I’ve found myself focusing on which party will run the country rather than local issues or interests.

My vote will be influenced much less by local candidates or by party leaders than it will be by the policies of the parties. Sadly, it means looking at policies that will do the least harm rather than the most good.

This is one of those elections in which turnout could be pivotal to the result. In last weekend’s advance polls, 4.7 million people voted, up 29 per cent from advance polls in 2015. In 2015, the increase in advance poll voting was 70 per cent over 2011.

In all, 27 million Canadians are eligible to vote. With the election looking so tight, the success of parties in getting their supporters to the polls will be crucial.

The overall turnout in 2015 was 68 per cent, the highest since 1993. In fact, it was about the same as several elections in the 1880s, and higher than the 1890s. Throughout our country’s history, with a few exceptions up or down, election turnouts have been remarkably consistent.

In Kamloops – Thompson - Cariboo, by the way, the turnout in 2015 was 73 per cent, up a whopping 10 percent from 2011.

So those who wring their hands over the alleged crisis in federal election turnouts, relax. Be happy.

Think, then go out and vote.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more