Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

‘Unless John Horgan can come up with a plan to grow the economy and reduce debt then British Columbians better hold on to their wallets’ ~~ Stephanie Cadieux

Yesterday we had two different accounts of BC’s economy – and of course they did not match up. From the BC NDP’s Finance Minister, Carole James, came these words:

Today’s update from S & P Global Ratings shows that our plan to invest in people while balancing the budget is not only possible, but also fundamental to building a strong and sustainable economy

BC Finance Minister Carole James
Image from Facebook

We have sustained responsible budget management and invested in our most valuable resource — the people who power our province”, she continued.

The governments media release, regarding S&P’s Global rating, went on to state that ... along with an expectation of operating surpluses, the government has an ambitious capital plan focused on investment in productive assets, such as transportation infrastructure, health facilities, and school replacement programs ...

Andrew Weaver’s BC Liberals however, were not so easily persuaded of good times ahead.  BC Liberal Finance Co-critics, Shirley Bond and Stephanie Cadieux, instead issued qualms ... after ratings agency Standard and Poor’s (S&P) threatened to downgrade BC’s AAA credit rating amid concerns about rising debt to revenue rates.

BC Liberals went on, stating that according to S&P ... British Columbia is not prepared to withstand any economic shocks or downturns should debt levels continue to rise.

Cadieux stated, “Unless John Horgan can come up with a plan to grow the economy and reduce debt then British Columbians better hold on to their wallets.”

So ... according to the BC NDP interpretation of the S & P Report ... “BC’s financial management practices remain very strong.” 

While the BC Liberals understanding is ... “if fiscal slippage or other policy decisions cause this ratio to rise notably above current expected levels, it could begin to erode BC's resiliency to the next economic downturn.”

I for one will tend to side with the BC Liberals on this one.  The governments fiscal house, is one all should be concerned with. Rising debt means that interest on that debt is rising as well.

The updated Fiscal and Debt Summary of the BC government (June 30th, 2019) states that total taxpayer supported provincial debt is $71.32 BILLION dollars.

So, how is this debt being paid for?  Looking at that same BC governments Fiscal and Debt Summary, it indicates that taxpayer supported interest is 3.2 cents for every dollar of government revenue.


Given what the BC government, and the BC Liberals, are stating ... it would appear that our fiscal house is on a knife edge, and a downturn could tip us into a nightmare of cuts to core government services. And according the BC government, in an April Report to investors that the government was looking to provide them with financing, there are indeed risks to our fiscal well-being.

These risks, as outlined by the government, include:
... uncertainty regarding global trade policy

... slower than expected global economic activity, particularly in Asia and other regions

... disruption to economic growth in Europe

...timing of investment and hiring related to the LNG Canada project

... stronger than expected impacts of past and future monetary policy tightening on interest rate sensitive sectors

... exchange rate and commodity price volatility 

These are serious concerns, not to be taken lightly – especially given repeated warnings of a possible upcoming recession.

Government spending has a direct cost to the people of BC, and the business community, therefore the government must be prudent with the financial resources we provide.

And those who continue to cry out for more and more government spending need to realize the approaching consequences if it does not end. 

FOOTNOTE ... all political parties, in the current federal election, also seem hell-bent on what they are willing to offer to Canadians. And far too many are failing to realize the cost of these goodies will be borne by you and I. With ten days remaining until we vote, I can only cringe thinking of what still remains when it comes to upcoming announcements in what has become a spending frenzy.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more