Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Alberta needs help. The world has to turn away from fossil fuel expansion, not from Albertans

USED WITH PERMISSION -- The following letter was recently sent by Peter Ladner to Rick Peterson of Suits and Boots. Peter Ladner is a retired entrepreneur, journalist, politician, author and grandfather.

Peter Ladner: Retired entrepreneur, journalist, author & grandfather
Thanks for hosting and organizing the Suits and Boots “Face-to-Face Resource Sector Tour” event (held) in Vancouver. It is so good to get those with opposing views in the same room, instead of fanning the flames in our protected echo chambers.

I wish I had added two things when you gave me the opportunity to talk.

The first is can we just shut up about the foreign-funded radical conspiracy, and shut down the war room that ennobles it? It has been thoroughly debunked by Sandy Garossino and Markham Hislop — not because Vivian Krause’s facts are wrong, but because they are carefully selected to weave a fraudulent narrative that elevates her by demonizing organizations like the David Suzuki Foundation, where I sit on the board.

Imagine your own organization, made up of decent people doing their best to make the world a better place as they see it, being publicly attacked by a taxpayer-funded government initiative aimed at shutting it down based on false information.

The foreign-funded radicals’ narrative deviously leads people to satisfying but unwarranted hatred and anger that diverts them from the hard work of managing the inevitable energy transition. As I’m sure you know by now, the Tar Sands campaign has wound down, it was never the cause of Alberta’s economic woes, it was always overwhelmingly funded and led by Canadians, and its American funders spent far more money opposing US and international fossil fuel expansion than they did in Canada.

The second point is that from the viewpoint of the David Suzuki Foundation (where we got 5% of our funding from US sources last year BTW), ENGOs/Greens are not driven in any way by bad feelings towards Albertans, especially those whose lives have been upended by the current economic downturn in that province. Providing a compassionate transition for workers upended by fossil fuel reductions is job #1.

We are driven by a passion similar to that of your members, only we are more focused on climate change as the looming destroyer of the economy and quality of life of everyone on the planet. As your young member said at the lunch, young people are so distressed by this reality they are committing suicide and suffering unprecedented levels of mass depression. Unfortunately, science tells us that fossil fuel expansion has to stop if we are going to even pretend to meet Paris targets.

I think the elephant in the room is that from the point of view of someone desperate to keep the oil flowing, climate change is denied or pushed aside. I can’t count the number of articles and interviews and posts I have read that purport to get to the bottom of Alberta’s problems without ever mentioning the phrase “climate change”. As though it doesn’t exist.

I think I know why.

I won’t deal with the deniers. But in my sincere efforts to understand Alberta’s point of view (I still haven’t blocked Brett Wilson from my Twitter feed!) the strongest argument I’ve heard for ignoring climate change is that Canada only produces 2% of world GHG emissions so why should we suffer when China, India, the US and other countries aren’t doing their bit? This is a strong argument, even without accounting for the massive GHG-reduction initiatives underway in those countries.

And yet it makes me think of our response to the glut of plastic and microplastics piling up in the world, killing fish, birds, and entering all our bloodstreams and food. We all want it to stop. But why should I reduce my plastic use when it won’t make any difference in the bigger picture? In my mind, I have no choice. I just can’t throw plastic into the ocean and think it’s OK. For the same reason, I don’t litter. For the same reason, I’m dug in on reducing GHG emissions.

If climate change is bringing catastrophic harm to billions of people in the world, I have no choice but to do everything I can to reduce that harm. We cannot ask or expect China, India, the US or any other country to act if Canada doesn’t do its part. We’re high per capita emission producers, we’ve off-loaded many of our emissions to countries like China that produce all our stuff, and we’re more able to adapt compared to less developed countries. We cannot reach our Paris targets without curtailing future oil production.

So, yeah, it’s easy for me to say this because I’m well-off, retired, happily hypocritical about flying on holidays and driving my car, and not going to suffer personally from limits to fossil fuel expansion in Canada. I realize that colours my views, but it doesn’t make me unsympathetic to Alberta’s plight, and it doesn’t mean Alberta can tune out climate change.

Alberta needs help. The world has to turn away from fossil fuel expansion, not from Albertans. 

Many of us are eager to help speed the energy transition in Alberta and across the country in the most prosperous and least harmful way possible. I used to be chair of The Natural Step Canada, which organizes the Energy Futures Lab in Alberta, funded in part by Suncor, to do just that.

Having a more honest and understanding discussion of these new realities is an essential requirement for this transition.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more