Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED - The Conservative mandarins believe they can hire specialists to package a leader and run an election campaign. They have been proven wrong twice in a row


We are still wondering how the Conservative Party of Canada (CPC) managed to lose the October election. It seems we were even more inept than our opponents.

Many of us underestimate the impact of abortion and gay rights protection; both are highly charged, emotional issues. Being pro-abortion and pro-gay is “in”. Conservative leader Andrew Sheer was indecisive, which is considered dangerous by those who motivated by emotion. A 5% swing in undecided votes is deadly in a first past the post system.


Scheer’s campaign people and advisors should all be dismissed. In the critical period from the beginning of May to the end of August, Scheer was a ghost with no media presence. No one knew what he stood for. No policies were articulated. The CPC was a cipher.

Scheer failed to “brand” the Conservative Party as his. That led to criticisms that the CPC was still Harper-era, and that Scheer was a reincarnation of Harper. Scheer needed to brand the Conservatives as his in mid-May, so MPs and candidates had a plan for the summer BBQ circuit.

The team wasted the summer visiting the converted. CPC members got a better look at Scheer and he was impressive. However, the people he needed to impress were the vast audience of the undecided. He needed public rallies that depended on the branding that did not happen.

He did not present a “Scheer Conservative Party” which lead to “Joe Who?” questions that were entirely predictable and just as hurtful as they were to Clark.


The team strategy was to have Scheer open late in the campaign and adopt a father figure, prime ministerial stance that oozed confidence and capability. That would have worked in May. By September the opposition parties had branded Scheer in the public arena. He was on the defensive and the campaign sputtered to a halt.

It’s been over 5 weeks since the election, and most are still unsure of who Andrew Scheer is, and what he stands for. That tells us much about incompetence of the people advising him.

You cannot primp, package and sell a political leader. That only happens in the movies. You must analyze the leader, discover his or her strengths and passions and build your campaign around that. Then you are promoting the ‘real thing’ and will get real results.

Scheer’s ever-present smile and dimples preclude presenting him as “prime ministerial”. He looks like what he is; an intelligent, affable, approachable leader with a passion and plan for Canada. The Conservative mandarins believe they can hire specialists to package a leader and run an election campaign. They have been proven wrong twice in a row.

The problem is far greater than Scheer; the CPC mandarins need to be tossed and replaced.

If Scheer engineers a palace coup d’état in April, he can lead the Conservative Party to victory when the minority is defeated. More than that, the show of strength will enhance his standing in Parliament and make alliances much easier to make.

If he does not, neither Scheer nor a replacement can overcome the inertia of an out of touch, irrelevant party executive. That is the real albatross Peter MacKay spoke of; the unelected, paid mandarins and party officials who scurry down the dark passages of the CPC Party HQ dispensing advice ... but immune from accountability. 

They have failed us and must be replaced.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more