Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ON THE OTHER HAND ... In recent years the silent majority are more and more being made to feel what they think, and believe, is morally wrong and reprehensible


Here’s my take on the Don Cherry poppy debacle ... please take a moment to can read the comments ofLaila Yuile as well.




The late Canadian Prime Minister John Diefenbaker once said, “I am a Canadian, a free Canadian, free to speak without fear” ... but I ask, how true are those words these days.  We have become people who are easily offended, who look for hidden meaning in words, who forget and dismiss our past, and who look through rose coloured glasses at those who came before us.



I ask this in light of the silent majority who in recent years are more and more being made to feel that what they think, and believe, is morally wrong and reprehensible.



Regrettably Don Cherry has never been the most eloquent in his usage of the English language. I believe what he said on Saturday night was spoken in a sincere belief that ALL Canadians, new and old, had a debt of gratitude for those who had served our country. I do not believe it was intended as a racist commentary -- in any way shape or form.



I'm very disappointed in the 'moral' outrage expressed by so many who have likely never accomplished, or done, even 1% of what he achieved.  An individual who loved Canada ... and ‘yes’ who loved Canadian hockey. Over many years Don Cherry also lent his considerable persona to numerous charitable causes, most significantly, organ donation awareness.



I posted much of the above, on both my personal ‘non-political’ Facebook page, as well as my ‘political’ Facebook page.  I never thought it would elicit much comment on the personal page, however I was wrong. Quite a number of people – men and women – young and old – gave a thumbs up and expressed disappointment, or concern, that he was fired for what he had to say.



Not all however, as one individual expressed that, “In Canada anyone can exercise their free speech, but that comes with some responsibility, and sometimes if you live by the sword, you die by it as well”.



One individual also commented, “It WAS a conversation starter ... may we continue to hold in our minds the thought they fought to let Mr. Cherry speak and ... let all speak for ourselves ... be the words wise or dumb”.



Someone who agreed with Cherry stated, “I believe Don Cherry is deserving of respect rather than condemnation! I've not always agreed with everything he has said over the years, but I believe in his right to say it”.



That’s the side I come down on.  Whether we agree with someone or not, we should respect an individuals right to free speech.



Therefore, it was disappointing for me to see what happened yesterday -- something that is becoming less and less of a right for all -- 'free speech'.  Instead we are seeing ‘free speech’ become replaced by ‘approved speech’.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PEATS: I am writing with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community

The following is a copy of a letter sent to me, which was sent to BC’s Minister of Health Adrian Dix. It is with regards to the impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic in Dawson Creek.   Dear Minister,   I am writing to you today with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community. The closure, scheduled for the summer of 2024, is a result of the utterly burdensome terms and conditions imposed by the bureaucratic Northern Health. As a result, Dawson Creek stands to lose four doctors who have made this city their home, and who wish to continue serving the people of our community.   The impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic is a significant blow to our city. Not only will it result in the loss of highly qualified and dedicated healthcare professionals, but it will also deprive thousands of Dawson Creek residents of access to their primary physicians. At a time when healthcare se

Selina Robinson: "You broke my heart . . ." (The Real Story)

The mildly Zionist, innocuously leftish and now ousted advanced education minister’s letter to her New Democratic Party caucus colleagues, explaining why she has resigned the caucus to sit as an independent. The letter is an historic document, an artifact of the disgraceful cultural moment we’re living through. It’s important. It’s also a scorcher. It’s gathering a heck of a lot of attention . I’m printing it in full here. I’ve been insisting that what happened to Robinson is a much bigger deal and a completely different story than the one we’d all been led to believe. The necessary background: My piece in the National Post: The despicable untruths behind Selina Robinson's political lynching . More importantly , a Real Story investigation: The Problem With The Selina Robinson Story. . . It wasn't true. What follows is the story of what really happened. Let’s just get into it. Apart from punctuation and spelling I replicate the letter faithfully, with some further comm

Poll finds ignorance regarding BC NDP decision to co-manage public lands with indigenous (Western Standard)

. . . . The poll allowed British Columbians to give weight to key priorities. More than half say that the respect for reconciliation and the leadership shown by the government in including indigenous partners in decisions are both important to them. That said, concerns about further complicating resource development (which already necessitates the consideration of indigenous peoples' interests in relevant regions) and economic risks, are equally weighted by the population. ARI also found there is a sense the consultation timeline has been rushed. One-quarter (26%) say the current timeline offered by the government is acceptable. But more disagree, including half (48%) who want to see more consultation, extending deliberations into the fall or later this year, and one-quarter (27%) who want to kill the proposed changes entirely . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more