Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- If this government can’t design a simplified system that we can live with, we need to find a government that can do the job

Story Reference:  Liberals move to deliver tax cut they say will help 20 million Canadians. Finance minister says new measure will lower taxes for people earning less than about $150K a year

This is a classic exercise in making an announcement of doing (almost) nothing. The Basic Personal Amount (BPA) for personal federal income tax 2018 was $11,809, increasing to $12,069 for 2019, and scheduled to be $12,298 for 2020.

According to Finance Minister Bill Morneau, the increase from 2020 to 2023 will be from $12,069 (2019) to $15,000 by 2023 spread over four years -- that works out to about $733 per year. 

The 2020 BPA will be $12,802 rather than $12, 298 -- or an increase of $504. 

Morneau is adding complexity to an already incomprehensible Tax Act.

At a basic tax rate of 15% a taxpayer will save ($504 x .15 =) $75.60 or $6.30 per month in 2020. That will not offset carbon taxes or other pressured on increases in cost of living. There is also a catch to increases in BPA; if an employee does not file a new TD1 form with his employer in January, deductions will be based on the last TD1 form filed and payroll deductions will not diminish. The benefit will not be realized until the tax forms are filed in the following year.

What is particularly irking is that for taxpayers in the lowest two tax brackets – 15% (roughly $60K gross and under) and 20.5% (Roughly $61K to $120K gross), what matters is net income, that is income after taxes, CPP premiums and EI deductions.

  • Canada Pension Plan (CPP) premiums of 5.1% kick in on all earnings from $3,000 to $60,000.
  • Employment Insurance (EI) premiums of 1.62% apply to all earnings $55,000 and under.A person earning $37,000 annual sees about $5,600 or 15% of his or her gross pay eaten up by federal taxes, CPP premiums and EI premiums.
  • A person earning $140,000 annual sees about $28,250 or 20% of his or her gross pay eaten up by federal tax, CPP and EI.
  • Add in provincial income tax and the situation for those earning $120K or less is even more dire.

There are better solutions

The first ... is to overhaul the entire Employment Insurance program, which has become a welfare system.

Rules should be universal across Canada and not tweaked by province or region. Maternity benefits, parental leave, and coverage for illness and disability should be separate, opt-in programs with separate premiums. Students working to raise funds to offset tuition should be able to opt out of EI premiums if they are attending accredited college, university or apprentice programs.

The second ... is to raise the earning limits for the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) -- without changing the benefits levels -- and eliminating disability coverage. That can provide funding for increases in Old Age Security (OAS) and Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) programs to assist pensioners dependent on CPP for their retirement income and living in poverty. That is preferable to raising income tax rates for the wealthy.

The third ... is to simplify our federal income tax system.

There is no justification for the highly complex and cumbersome tome we currently suffer with. If this government can’t design a simplified system that we can live with, we need to find a government that can do the job.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more