Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: The comments of Attorney General David Eby, at least in my opinion, very much pre-judges the reasons why an individual may be before the courts


Three days ago (Dec 16th) in Williams lake, BC NDP Attorney General David Eby issued a statement in support of the new Indigenous court: 
 
Okanagan Correctional Centre
Our government is committed to addressing the over-representation of Indigenous peoples in the correctional system, which has its roots in systemic discrimination and the impacts of inter-generational trauma from residential schools.

The Province is working with Indigenous communities to establish Indigenous courts throughout British Columbia. These courts offer alternative sentencing options that honour traditional cultural practices, support rehabilitation and acknowledge the impact the person’s actions have had on others.

Attorney General Eby then continued, “I’m very pleased that Melissa Gillespie, provincial court chief judge, has increased access to these more culturally appropriate approaches in Williams Lake by approving the community’s proposal for an Indigenous court.

He then concluded, “It will support better outcomes for people in conflict with the law and help reduce the over-representation of Indigenous peoples in our jails. It also brings us one step closer to reaching one of our most important goals as a government – building a justice system that better respects and addresses the needs of Indigenous peoples.”


Let me begin by saying that it is a sad state of affairs when an individual, no matter their race, colour, sexual orientation, or religious beliefs must be concerned about speaking out for what they believe may be wrong.

I find myself in that very position now, however I am going to state what I believe regardless.

While I believe the Indigenous court system provides positive results, I think the comments of Attorney General David Eby very much pre-judges the reasons why an individual may be before the court system in the first place.


Furthermore, I believe it is also prejudicial towards the expectations of the resulting outcomes of a trial – whether in a regular or Indigenous peoples court.

Dozens of people we walk past, and see every single day, live lives that are very much developed by their family’s history, their upbringing, outside influences, if they have been sexually or physically abused, by genetics, through the ravages of drugs and / or alcohol, and by how they themselves have chosen to live.

Each on has their own story – sometimes good – sometimes bad – and sometimes very ugly.

Some may be scared by the impacts of war ... sustained sexual abuse ... the list goes on.

How we chose to make our way through life however, is a decision we have to make – and for some it is a painful, gut-wrenching, difficult thing to do.



Society and government therefore, I believe, is obligated to provide every support needed for those who have been victimized. That support must cover a wide range of things from counseling, education, safe places to live, treatment centres ... and those are just the obvious ones.

The costs will be high, but what is a human life worth, and how much value do we place on it?  What will be the never-ending costs of doing nothing?

The comments of David Eby should make us stop and consider if this is a road we want to travel, or if instead we want to provide individuals with what they need to become whole within.

To me, that’s an outcome that we should be striving for.

So, with that, I say to  Attorney General David Eby, ‘Again, I have no doubt the Indigenous court system provides positive results ... that said ... no one segment of society, before the court system, should be pre-judged as to the possible reasons for why they are before the court system ... it’s the wrong course of action’.

Comments

  1. Well given the dysfunctions of the past I'm willing to give this experiment a chance; a lot will depend on the details of the individual cases.
    Also, sending a young First Nations person to jail for a first offence would likely produce only a more hardened criminal so diversion could be productive.
    But diverting a repeat offender only because s/he is First Nations would be unwise, depending on the circumstances.
    In short, I don't think this experiment is worth opposing.
    Also, Eby has been doing a superb job as A-G and doesn't deserve any campaign against him.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more