Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Human rights exist for the individual not for any ‘group’. The idiocy of expanding to ‘group rights’ is evident in this case


This op /ed was inspired by a January 23rd Canadian Press story ... B.C. human rights commissioner responds to Indigenous LNG supporters


Ms Govender appears to be out of touch with our constitution. The Coastal GasLink pipeline is under federal, not provincial jurisdiction as it connects to an export port. In addition, the federal government has exclusive constitutional authority over indigenous people and lands.

BC Human Rights Commissioner
Karasi Govender
Provinces have no lawful authority to meddle in indigenous affairs.

Karasi Govender’s bafflegab is incomprehensible:
“Human rights do not exist for the majority, they exist for each individual and in the case of free, prior, and informed consent for each Indigenous rights holding group,” Govender says in her response.

Human rights exist for the individual not for any “group”. The idiocy of expanding to “group rights” is evident in this case.

Elected councils have approved construction of the pipeline. Hereditary chiefs, claiming jurisdiction over the same individuals who are represented by elected councils, claim they are not properly consulted.

It is irrelevant whether the Hereditary Chiefs have been consulted unless they can prove that they have a legal jurisdiction superior to elected councils.

This is a great deterrent to the concept of indigenous self-governance. Indigenous bands want to retain autonomy within the indigenous community and various “leaders” who disagree each claim to speak for the same indigenous people, which is impossible.


Hereditary chiefs talk about indigenous law, but there is no evidence of the existence of an indigenous legal system, and certainly not any legal system that is consistent throughout the indigenous community. Our government insistence that indigenous self-government is possible is an outright lie.


For indigenous self-governance to operate, indigenous people must have sovereignty with all that it entails. That would completely change Canada’s relationship with them. Canada would have to deal with indigenous people as she would with any other sovereign nation.

There are sensible solutions that would give indigenous bands local autonomy and authority over their affairs in the same manner as provincial municipalities.

We have suffered over a century of successive federal governments mishandling and mismanaging indigenous affairs. The time has come to scrap the Indian Act -- and with it the indigenous affairs departments -- and replace it with an Indigenous Affairs Office under direction of the Governor General.


The Governor General, with no vested interest in the government of the day, could call on some of the 350 non-government Privy Councillors and indigenous representatives to form a council to provide advice on creating a workable system of local self-governance for indigenous people and recommend legislation to make it work.

Part of the exercise would be to create a dispute resolution panel comprised of indigenous representatives and non-government Privy Councillors with possible appeals of its decisions to the Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court where warranted.

We have allowed this intolerable situation to fester untreated for far too long. 

We need a leader, a Prime Minister with the determination and spine to turn the special status granted to indigenous people under treaties into something valued and workable.

Indigenous people are fellow humans, no different than you and I, and we cannot continue to treat them as wards of the state. 

They are entitled to the same freedoms, rights and privileges as any other member of our society.

Stop debating endlessly, and make it happen.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

  1. You are right. Group right are a killer of enterprise.

    It is my personal belief there is but one way to put an end to the entire fiasco of continual obstruction to develpoment and that is to privatize the vast majority of public land. As long as there are multitudes of people who regard their voice to hold standing in granting approval for any development because it takes place in Canada, there will never be satisfied solutions. Far too many people will hold resentment for any decision.

    When only the propety owner needs to provide approval the problems can be satisfied.

    As to pollution, well, make a mess and you pay to clean it up.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

THE SIDEWINDER: MacDUFF'S NAIVE CALL

I have just struggled through Cheryl Ashlie's column ( MacDuff’s Call: A political novice with a sizeable ego ), in the Sept. 22 edition of The Maple Ridge News. To say the least, Ashlie's comments are naive and show just how totally out of touch she has become with political reality. Ashlie lauds the decision of Darryl Plecas to accept John Horgan's invitation to become the Speaker of the House, a move described by almost everyone else as self-serving and a betrayal of the trust of the constituents who voted for him. Ashlie claims Plecas' turncoat move will help provide good governance but in making this claim, she fails to explain how he will achieve this lofty goal.

Labels

Show more