Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SURVEY SAYS ... half of respondents were pessimistic about the future of BC's natural resource sector; may reflect slow pace of project approval in BC, and well-publicized opposition to resource development


Promoting innovation ... marketing BC's "low carbon advantage" ... and building new markets ... needed for the resource sector to compete globally

British Columbians recognize the integral role natural resources play in driving the provincial economy and support increased investment in the sector to encourage sustainable resource development.


That's one of the key findings of the inaugural BC Natural Resources Survey conducted by the BC Chamber of Commerce, C3 Alliance Corp, and research company Abacus Data, between November 14th of last year, and January 10th of this year.

The survey was designed to gauge public perceptions on natural resource development, growth prospects for various business sectors, obstacles holding back resource expansion and ideas for sustainable development, among other issues.

More than 1,000 individuals responded to the survey, representing a broad cross-section of British Columbians comprising a healthy mix of income and education levels, geographic regions, and spanning diverse political affiliations. Half of respondents had no ties to the resource sector, while the other half either worked in natural resources or had a family member or acquaintance affiliated with the sector.

"We undertook this research project to get a better sense of how British Columbians felt about the province's economic drivers," said Sarah Weber, President and CEO, C3 Alliance Corp.

"Clearly, BC residents understand the important contribution of natural resources to their economic well being. Even among individuals who are not connected to the sector, there's a deep appreciation for the role natural resources play in driving BC's prosperity."

Among the survey findings:
  • 55% of respondents said natural resources were crucial to the BC economy, while another 43% considered them very important.
  • 86% of people either strongly agreed or agreed that a strong resource sector helps create a vibrant economic base in BC on which we can grow other parts of the economy.
  • A majority of respondents (81%) acknowledged that revenue from natural resources helps pay for provincial social programs such as health care and education.
  • 75% of people agreed that the provincial government should encourage more investment in BC's natural resource sector.

"What we're seeing is broad-based support for responsible resource development by British Columbians," said Val Litwin, President and CEO of the BC Chamber of Commerce.

"BC's reliance on clean hydroelectricity gives our resource sector a distinct low-carbon advantage compared to other international jurisdictions.  This is a key selling point that we should be marketing aggressively to help grow our economic base."

British Columbians recognize this export attribute, with 78% of respondents saying they would like BC to more aggressively promote its "low-carbon advantage" globally.


The majority of respondents are proud of BC's natural resource sector, acknowledging that participating companies offer well-paying, highly skilled jobs, are environmentally thoughtful, well run, technologically advanced and innovative. Sixty-five percent of British Columbians said they would encourage young people to work in natural resources.

When asked how important various business sectors will be in ten years, 47% cited natural resources, with another 36% stated the sector will play the same role it does today.

Specific business segments British Columbians believe are poised for growth include: renewable energy (75%), followed by high-technology (68%), energy (58%), agriculture (54%), natural gas/LNG (51%), tourism/hospitality (45%), forest products (31%), mining (29%), and film and TV production (22%).

It's notable that when asked how they would prefer specific sectors to rank in terms of their importance to the BC economy, 53% of British Columbians said they would like to see forestry become 'more important' followed by 44% who cited mining.

Surprisingly, half of respondents were pessimistic about the future of the province's natural resource sector, which may reflect the slow pace of project approval in BC and well-publicized opposition to resource development. Impediments to growth cited include onerous government regulations, pressure groups and protests, climate change, labour costs, insufficient government incentives to attract investment, competition for talent, climate and taxes.

British Columbians believe we must take measures to improve economic prospects for the natural resources industry including; promoting innovation, positioning BC as a leader in low-carbon resource products and identifying and building markets for sustainably produced products.


Results from the BC Natural Resources Survey will be presented at the 17th Annual BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, BC , January 28 to 30, 2020.  

Speakers at the Forum will include BC Premier John Horgan, Tracy Robinson, Executive Vice-President and President, Canadian Natural Gas Pipelines, TC Energy, Sue Paish, CEO, Canada's Digital Technology Supercluster, Affonso Jr. Bizon, General Manager, Rio Tinto BC Works, Peter Zebedee, CEO, LNG Canada, James Thompson, Vice-President, Western Region, CN, and Chief Councillor Crystal Smith, Haisla Nation, among other community and industry leaders.

SOURCE C3 Alliance Corp.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PEATS: I am writing with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community

The following is a copy of a letter sent to me, which was sent to BC’s Minister of Health Adrian Dix. It is with regards to the impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic in Dawson Creek.   Dear Minister,   I am writing to you today with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community. The closure, scheduled for the summer of 2024, is a result of the utterly burdensome terms and conditions imposed by the bureaucratic Northern Health. As a result, Dawson Creek stands to lose four doctors who have made this city their home, and who wish to continue serving the people of our community.   The impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic is a significant blow to our city. Not only will it result in the loss of highly qualified and dedicated healthcare professionals, but it will also deprive thousands of Dawson Creek residents of access to their primary physicians. At a time when healthcare se

Selina Robinson: "You broke my heart . . ." (The Real Story)

The mildly Zionist, innocuously leftish and now ousted advanced education minister’s letter to her New Democratic Party caucus colleagues, explaining why she has resigned the caucus to sit as an independent. The letter is an historic document, an artifact of the disgraceful cultural moment we’re living through. It’s important. It’s also a scorcher. It’s gathering a heck of a lot of attention . I’m printing it in full here. I’ve been insisting that what happened to Robinson is a much bigger deal and a completely different story than the one we’d all been led to believe. The necessary background: My piece in the National Post: The despicable untruths behind Selina Robinson's political lynching . More importantly , a Real Story investigation: The Problem With The Selina Robinson Story. . . It wasn't true. What follows is the story of what really happened. Let’s just get into it. Apart from punctuation and spelling I replicate the letter faithfully, with some further comm

Poll finds ignorance regarding BC NDP decision to co-manage public lands with indigenous (Western Standard)

. . . . The poll allowed British Columbians to give weight to key priorities. More than half say that the respect for reconciliation and the leadership shown by the government in including indigenous partners in decisions are both important to them. That said, concerns about further complicating resource development (which already necessitates the consideration of indigenous peoples' interests in relevant regions) and economic risks, are equally weighted by the population. ARI also found there is a sense the consultation timeline has been rushed. One-quarter (26%) say the current timeline offered by the government is acceptable. But more disagree, including half (48%) who want to see more consultation, extending deliberations into the fall or later this year, and one-quarter (27%) who want to kill the proposed changes entirely . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more