Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DIETER DUDY -- Unfulfilled promises are considered an abrogation of trust and that is counter to what any elected official has declared an oath to prevent


A fellow Kamloops City councillor had a recent post wherein he asked what people considered that politicians, in general, could do to build more trust in those they serve and represent. This is a valid, fair, though difficult question.
His post received many cogent and thoughtful replies and I’d just like to add my perspective if I may.

There have been, and still are, politicians that have and continue to put their own interests ahead of those of the public they serve. 

This tends to happen more often in larger political arenas than in what’s found at the local level. The sad reality, however, is that the average citizen doesn’t differentiate between levels of government and sees them all painted with the same brush. 

In their mind when it comes to corruption, local, provincial, or federal, a bad apple just goes to show just how broken our system is.

As a politician, my trying to convince you that this behaviour is not indicative of the whole nor as pervasive as you might think would only be seen as an expected defensive reaction. Therefore, I’m going to take off my political hat and try to answer the original question as a tax-paying member of our community ... “What do politicians in general need to do to engender more trust in those they serve?”

First off ... don’t lie.

Quite often politicians are placed in positions where they can’t be completely transparent. This may be a result of confidentiality agreements, land deals, labour negotiations, legal proceedings to name a few.

Key here though is that rather than beating around the bush - so to speak - it is far more prudent to just admit that you can’t speak on the matter. Not being able to comment is not lying, however, attempting to sugar coat in an effort to appease can be perceived as being just that.

Second ... don’t promise the moon, stars, galaxies or the universe if you can’t deliver.

Whether it’s lower taxes, new infrastructure, variances, electoral reform, etc ... it’s impossible to walk back from promises that aren’t kept. It is far better to say that you will consider these issues and bring them forward to whichever level of government you represent in an attempt to address them.

Never guarantee outcomes. Unfulfilled promises are considered an abrogation of trust and that is counter to what any elected official has declared an oath to prevent.


Third ... be available.

Whether in person, by phone, mail, social media, just be there. Be prepared to listen, consider, and bring forward without committing to outcomes. Recognize your role as one of many, advocate for those you serve and debate on the merits of the issues. 

Politicians serve at the will of the people ... primarily because they have convinced enough people that they share common core beliefs and concerns. Once elected however, their responsibility is not just to those who have elected them but to the overall community, province, federation.

Positions change as a result of new information, compelling debate, clearer perspectives. Recognizing that it illustrates how your elected official is open-minded on all issues in the interests of determining what serves the populace while considering every voice. 

In closing, while answering the original question ...

The way to instill trust is not to be swayed by emotion -- not to be guided by threats -- not take the politically expedient route -- but give due consideration, listen unbiasedly, deliberate fairly, and finally take comfort in the fact that you have above all been honest and are willing to face your public every day.
Kamloops City Councilor
Dieter Dudy

 
ABOUT Dieter Dudy:

Dieter was born in Germany and raised in Kitimat.  He met his wife Deb Kellogg, who grew up in Kamloops, in Victoria and has been married for 34+ years. They have two adult children. 

His passion for sustainability led him to purchase and develop a 10-acre property where he and Deb have successfully established an organic vegetable farm and business.

Elected in November of 2014, Dieter is also a Councillor with the City of Kamloops.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more