Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- We have millions displaced fleeing conflicts or persecution. That's precisely what the UN was created to prevent, and the organization is a colossal failure


Let’s get one thing straight ...  a temporary (two-year term) seat on the Security Council is not worth much and has very little impact on United Nations affairs. 


The security Council has fifteen members:

Permanent members (each with veto power):
   China
   France
   Great Britain
   Russia
   United States.

Rotating Term members:
   Belgium (2020)
   Dominican Republic (2020)
   Estonia (2021)
   Germany (2020)
   Indonesia (2020)
   Niger (2021)
   Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (2021)
   South Africa (2020)
   Tunisia (2021)
   Viet Nam (2021)

Germany and Indonesia are being replaced this year, but the rotating term members are not a “Who’s Who” of world leaders.

Any resolution raised by Security Council members or forwarded from the UN General Assembly can be quashed by any one of the five permanent members and often is.

There is a good deal of cost to holding a Security Council seat and it is not a venue where Canada can raise equality, human rights, women’s rights, worker’s rights or other issues dear to Mr. Trudeau’s heart with any hope of success.

General Assembly resolutions condemning Israel, usually sponsored by the African nations Justin Trudeau is currently campaigning are common and regular. Does this represent a shift in Canada’s foreign policy?

The objective of the five permanent members is to protect their geopolitical aspirations first and always. The members are often clandestinely funding and supporting opposite sides in an internal skirmish or civil war.


The result is a failure to prevent or stop armed conflicts even though civilian populations pay the price in displacement from their homes, injuries or deaths.
 
We have millions of people displaced fleeing conflicts or persecution. That is precisely what the UN was created to prevent ... and the organization is a colossal failure.

Instead of being guardian of a peaceful orderly world with minimal conflict, the United Nations has evolved into a socialist paradise with the aim of wealth redistribution to ensure that we all suffer an equal share of misery and poverty while ruled by unaccountable bureaucrats in the UN system.


The United Nations was not created to preside over global warning. UN Bureaucrats saw global warming predictions as an opportunity to punish industrialized nations for their success and a means to transfer wealth to the third world.

It is really a taxation scheme to fund foreign aid without the consent of the funding nation’s governments. That is what the penalties for failing to meet Paris Agreement emission reduction targets are all about. The first attempt to spell out the penalties, which are supposed to take effect this year failed as industrialized nation would not agree to the terms.

The UN is going to try to set penalties again at the next Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, Scotland (COP 26) November 9-19, 2020. Hang on to your wallets!

There is no prestige in supporting this exercise in communism lite; only increasing expense to us and our economy which we do not need or want.

It is time to tell the United Nations farewell; we loved it for the hope it offered when it was formed but cannot abide what it has become.

John Feldsted
Political Commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

The stats clearly demonstrate the need for professional and impartial advice at the time of purchase, renewal, and refinancing of mortgages

REPRINTED WITH PERMISSION : Canadian Mortgage Trends   Canadians need guidance with their mortgages ... t hat’s the takeaway from a national survey released this week by Rates.ca, which found half of Canadians aren’t aware of the mortgage options available to them. Not only that, but Canadians are lacking in some other basic mortgage trivia, with an astounding 9 out of 10 respondents not knowing that mortgage interest is charged semi-annually: 28% think interest is compounded monthly; 17% think it’s bi-weekly; 17% think it’s annually; 28% just have no idea. Should we be concerned? Dustan Woodhouse, President of Mortgage Architects, and a former active broker who has written multiple educational mortgage books, thinks so. “ Sounds about right. We know about what we pay attention to, i.e., The Kardashians ,” he wrote to CMT. “ The material concern in this is how easy it makes it for the government to over-regulate the industry, with c

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su

Labels

Show more