Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FORSETH: (some) Politicians will do anything to engender reliance on their bountiful spending -- for everything wished for – but not necessarily needed

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and
Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland

Today, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland held their eleventh call with premiers to discuss the evolving COVID-19 situation.

The lead
ers discussed the collaborative efforts by federal, provincial, and territorial partners to combat the pandemic and protect the health, safety, and economic well-being of all Canadians.

I wonder however, when the talk came to the ‘economic well-being of all Canadians’, how much time was devoted to that topic.

Billions and billions of dollars have been made available, to workers, to renters, to health care workers, to small businesses, to students, to seniors, and to large corporations.

BC Hydro has a relief fund ... there’s a freeze on rental rates ... there’s low income wage top-ups ... increased child support benefits ... it’s a jumble of Scrabble tiles spelling a multitude of acronyms, of which the following are just a few.

  • C.E.C.R.A. -- Canada Emergency Commercial Rental Assistance
  • C.E.R.B. -- the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit
  • C.E.S.B. -- the Canada Emergency Student Benefit
  • C.E.B.A -- the Canada Emergency Business Account
  • C.E.W.S. -- the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy
  • B.C.T.R.S. – the BC Temporary Rental Supplement
  • B.C.E.B.W. – the BC Emergency Benefit for Workers
  • C.S.S.G. -- the Canada Student Service Grant

And as I noted in a commentary the other day – even political parties both federally – and here in BC -- have had a share in government

largesse.

Has much of this money been necessary to prevent an economic collapse?  In large part, I believe so, however I’m beginning to have concerns.

‘Some’ receiving rent subsidies aren’t paying rent – ‘some’ drugs users are receiving a windfall of money never seen before (and sadly overdose deaths are increasing due to a never ending fentanyl laced supply of drugs) – ‘some’ are receiving the emergency wage benefit who have no interest in working – there are over-lapping programs – and the list goes on.

Talking with one of my political friends, this morning, they said to me:

It’s scary to think about who is going to pay for the socialist programs being rolled out by the feds and our great NDP friends here in BC. It’s not good.”

They went on to say, “People do need help -- but there needs to be a transparent and parallel economic strategy -- and neither the feds or the province (of BC) are offering nothing in this regard”.

It's become scary, at least for me, to read and hear about the daily never-ending smorgasbord buffet of goodies being handed out.

People need help, but it seems like there are very few (none?) checks and balances in place regarding actual need. And that makes me fear for the future of my adult children – and for their children – who will be left to pick up the tab.

And perhaps even further down the road.

I fear this burden will extend into great grandkids time”, said my friend.

Governments want the people to love and appreciate them – and ‘some’ politicians will do anything to engender reliance on their bountiful spending for everything wished for – but often times not necessarily needed.

People do need help, but it is incumbent on governments to at least have a recovery plan that is more than just handing out more money.

That’s why it’s time to put the brakes on the spending announcements, and for sane heads to review programs and spending already in place ... because governments, unfortunately, can’t always be relied on to do it themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more