Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED -- More scandals in the making

One of Canada's largest long-term care operators is owned by a federal Crown corporation. 'We are extremely saddened by the difficult circumstances,' Treasury Board President Duclos says
John Paul Tasker ~~ CBC News ~~ May 25, 2020

One of the largest operators of seniors' residences and long-term care homes in Canada is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Public Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP), a federal Crown corporation charged with investing funds for the pension plans of the federal public service, the Canadian Forces, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Reserve Force.

Treasury Board President Jean-Yves Duclos
The company, Revera, owns or operates dozens of properties across Canada; it also has major holdings in the United States and the U.K., with a portfolio of seniors' apartments, assisted living and long-term care homes.

... a $50 million class action lawsuit was launched against Revera earlier this month on behalf of the families of COVID-19 victims at the company's long-term care facilities in Ontario. The company is being sued for negligence and breach of contract.

The plaintiffs allege the facilities lacked "proper sanitation protocols and adequate testing to prevent the spread of COVID-19."

... another $25-million class-action lawsuit has been filed against Revera over its operation of the McKenzie Towne Continuing Care Centre in Calgary, where COVID-19 killed 21 residents and infected 63 others as well as 44 employees. The suit, which has not been certified, alleges the company was negligent and did not follow proper protocols to prevent the outbreak.

... the company's board of directors is appointed by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his cabinet through orders in council.
|

CLICK HERE to read the full story

****************

 
This revelation left me speechless with anger.

I suspect many others -- who have their pension funds managed by the Public Sector Pension Investment Board -- are unaware that the Rivera Crown Corporation exists. Prudent investments in well-managed operations to maximize return on our jointly held funds is one thing; creating a crown corporation to own and operate private businesses is not what we expect from the fund managers.

Why would our government decide to directly compete in the personal care facility marketplace?

It would appear that Rivera is no better then other slum landlords in the personal care facility business. The potential liabilities are staggering. For a view of personal care facility deaths, CLICK HERE (the site is updated daily). Click on the Canada Summary at the bottom of the page to see the numbers. At this writing, 82% of all COVID-19 deaths have been in personal care facilities.

It is not material that Treasury Board President Jean-Yves Duclos is “saddened”.

Pension fund contributors need to know if their funds are at risk. Who is going to pay for lawyers defending claims against Rivera? Setting and maintaining standards for personal care facilities are a provincial responsibility irrespective of ownership. There are conflicts of interest to consider.

The abridged excuse for a parliament occasionally in session does not help. We have no way to secure answers for our many questions. This is the tip of an exceptionally large iceberg.

The fur and flack tossed about is going to be substantial.

Story of note: Doug Ford says, 'Greedy' Investors Should Get Out Of Nursing Home Business (Huffington Post)

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more