Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Governments have been hiding by deferring controversial decisions to the judiciary rather than dealing with them as they are required to do under the constitution

This is the third in a series ... on the Executive Branch of the Canadian government.  You can CLICK HERE to read Part #1 ... and CLICK HERE to read Part #2

 

In previous commentaries, I outlined the constitutional arrangement of the Executive Branch and some reasons why the Privy Council must be returned to the domain of the Governor General. I have also indicated that the Privy Council must be politically neutral.

All legislation, whether initiated by the House of Commons, the Senate, or a Private Member is referred to the Privy Council for review. Since the Privy Council should include opposition members and may include other experts, Privy Council confidentiality is ironclad. Materials forwarded to the Privy Council and discussion related thereto cannot be used or discussed outside of the Privy Council. Members cannot take what they have learned in Privy Council proceedings back to their political parties. That would end the usefulness of the body. 

Our current government is misusing Privy Council confidentiality to hide Cabinet materials which is a different matter and has different confidentiality.

When Cabinet matters are requested by the opposition parties or a commons committee, and the government refuses to divulge information, the opposition can refer the issue to a court and have a judge decide if the release of the documents requested or parts thereof are in the public interest and order release of those that are.

We have long complained about “judge-made law” where activist judges include changes to the law in their decisions. Constitutionally, enactment of laws is the exclusive jurisdiction of Parliament or the Legislatures depending on subject and jurisdiction. The Governor General has the power to rescind the appointment of any Officer of the Crown which includes judges.

Governments have been hiding by deferring controversial decisions to the judiciary rather than dealing with them as they are required to do under the constitution. We can bring an end to that nonsense. The judiciary cannot be allowed to usurp the constitutional powers and responsibilities of our governments. Our laws must be made up by elected representatives, not judges.

Lack of Executive oversight has put far too much power in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) which has resulted in unconstitutional abuses of authority. The federal government routinely infringes on issues and matters that are an exclusive provincial jurisdiction. Our nation is weakened as a result.

The exercise of Executive powers has always been cautious and circumspect. There has never been an instance in any Commonwealth nation where Executive powers have been abused.

We have often complained that we do not have an impeachment process similar to the Republic to the south ... in fact, we do.

The Governor General has the power to remove a Prime Minister from office for cause; as was demonstrated in Australia in 1975. It is not a decision taken lightly.

We have assumed that our governments act within the constitution, but failure to address instances where powers are abused have led to our governments overreaching their constitutional powers in some instances and ignoring their responsibilities in others.

The road to the resurrection of our representative democracy begins with the return of the Privy Council to the Governor General’s domain. The key element is not so much resurrection of the Executive Branch as the reduction in powers of the Prime Minister’s Office. Loss of control over the Privy Council will help to reset our governance system to follow the constitution.  

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a

Labels

Show more