Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Should Western Canada Leave Confederation (Part 2)

PLEASE NOTE ... this is the second in a series on whether Western Canada should leave confederation. If you missed it, you can CLICK HERE for Part 1

To properly understand the impetus for confederation, we have to go back to 1841 and the British Parliament Act of Union that joined Upper and Lower Canada into one Province of Canada. Each of the former provinces would elect an equal number of representatives to a central Parliament.

Lower Canada was annoyed as Upper Canada had a population of about 450,000 while Lower Canada had a population of about 650,000. The result was that no political leader could draw enough support from the ‘other side’ to form a majority government.

Elections were held in 1841,1844, 1848,1851, 1854, 1858, 1981, and 1863 without a workable government being elected. The notion of joining with other provinces to break the deadlock led to talks between Upper Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick. Quebec joined the talks.

All provinces were concerned over a potential American invasion as the American Civil War had ended in 1865, and the US had an ample army in uniform to invade and annex Canada. Quebec was particularly concerned as she feared that if America invaded and won, she would lose the rights she was granted by the Quebec Act of 1778.

The main reasons for confederation were to break the political deadlock in the Province of Canada, and unify to fight off a potential American invasion. There was no thought creating a wider Confederation or anything that did not protect the enjoined provinces of Upper and Lower Canada.

The British North America Act of 1867 clearly reflected the importance of Ontario and Quebec and made it clear that they were the central core of the confederation. Nothing has changed since.

In 1869, Canada purchased Rupert’s Land from the Hudson’s Bay Company, with considerable pressure from the British government. The Hudson’s Bay Company wanted to sell to the US at a higher price.

When the federal government tried to install a governor in the Red River Settlements, he faced a rebellion and the Province of Manitoba was created (1870).

The construction of a railway brought British Columbia into Confederation (1871).

These efforts were to vastly expand the territory under control of Canada. There was no thought to creating strong provinces or equality of any sort.

When the area between Manitoba and British Columbia was under settlement, the federal government feared a strong province might appear which would become a political problem, so it spit the territory into Alberta and Saskatchewan.

From the outset and creation of the British North America Act -- to today -- the intention is to concentrate political power in Ontario and Quebec ... and that has been succeeded so far.

Immigration has kept populations in those provinces high, and between them they hold 58.8% of Commons seats and a 45.7% of the Senate seats. Since the Senate is split along party lines despite efforts to show otherwise, Liberal control of the Senate is even stronger. |

The die is cast and we cannot look to constitutional amendments to improve our lot. We face a stark choice of remaining a subsidiary controlled by Ottawa or striking out on our own.


John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a

Labels

Show more