Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – Should Western Canada Leave Confederation (Part 3)

Feldsted says that a Republic of Western Canada retain membership in the British Commonwealth

PLEASE NOTE ... this is the third in a series discussing whether Western Canada should leave confederation. If you missed the earlier ones you can CLICK HERE for Part One – and CLICK HERE for Part Two


The creation of a Western Canada is not an easy undertaking and cannot succeed without widespread public support.

In the wake of anxiety over the shut down of the gas and oil sector and more anxiety over the coronavirus threat, people are in no mood to take risks with an unfamiliar governing model. They are not going to jump over a cliff.

Several readers have expressed a preference for forming a Republic rather than a Constitutional Monarchy. That is not a panacea or solution. There are 147 Republics word wide. Of those only 28 have ministries subject to parliamentary confidence. 62 including the United Stated have a president independent of the legislature. I am not opposed to a Republic, but creating a workable republic will take even more work and we are then proposing a marked difference from familiar governance.

The Western Canada model has to closely resemble the current Canada model. That is why I am recommending the use of the British North America Act as a template, modified to meet Western Canada needs. I will go further an recommend that we retain the Monarch as our Head of State and apply to become a Commonwealth nation.

There are currently 30 Constitutional Monarchies in the world. Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Cambodia, Canada, Denmark, Grenada, Jamaica, Japan, Lesotho, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Tuvalu & United Kingdom.

There are sound reasons for that approach. If Western Canada is accepted by Great Britain and other Commonwealth nations, we have solid allies worldwide that can help us find our feet and it will frustrate forces that try to block us.

That is why I would recommend applying to the United Nations for recognition and membership. We should also open talks with the USA and Mexico for recognition and inclusion in the new NAFTA and inclusion in NORAD. We need to leverage our military bases in Alberta and Manitoba as well as marine bases on the West Coast which are all vital to North American defence.

People need assurance that their governance and legal systems will be unchanged, except that they will be more efficient, effective and responsive.

We need to have international recognition and support so we can negotiate on an equal basis with Canada. We will not approach Canada hat-in-hand seeking permission to succeed. Canada will have to deal with an accomplished fact.  

We would adopt most of the Canadian legal system modified where necessary. Our Criminal Code should mirror the Canadian Criminal code with modification to the firearms section. Our citizens should know that familiar law will not be much different than what they are used to. We have no reason to import the Firearms Act, Official Languages Act or much of the convoluted environmental legislation. Our provincial governments are capable stewards of air, land and water quality.

The largest single problem that Canada has is that the amendment of its constitution is nearly impossible. It is locked into a constitution that does not address many modern issues that did not exist a century ago. Western Canada can overcome that with a more flexible constitution that will allow us to correct errors and missteps inevitable in forming a new nation.

A key is open public engagement from the outset. Once a draft constitution is completed, it has to be shared with the public before adoption. People need to see what they are being asked to support. The same goes for other key pieces of legislation such as the Criminal Code, the Elections Act and the Parliament Act.

We need to build the infrastructure to ensure that provincial residents can elect 104 members of the Western Canada Parliament to properly shepherd the new nation into being. They answer to the people who elected hem. We can, and should amend that Parliament Act that we adopt to prohibit political parties from dictating to elected representatives. They are there to represent their constituents, not anyone or anything else.

Similarly, residents can elect two Senators from each province to serve a fixed term. Senators have to swear an oath of political neutrality to take their seats. Their job is to review legislation and policies strictly on the terms of benefits or detriments to the people of their province. That is the proper function of a Senate.

These are more of the issues that need fulsome discussion and debate before launching an effort to create a Western Canada. I have avoided the separation debate largely because I have felt that the key elements have not been adequately discussed.

Getting angry and walking out is not viable. When that door slams, we have to have a workable plan that has been lacking.

Western Canada will be responsible for the lives, liberty and well-being of about 12 million people. We can’t manage that without sound planning and enormous preparations that are part of it.

John Feldsted ... in a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.


  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a


Show more