Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – Should Western Canada Leave Confederation (Part 3)

Feldsted says that a Republic of Western Canada retain membership in the British Commonwealth

PLEASE NOTE ... this is the third in a series discussing whether Western Canada should leave confederation. If you missed the earlier ones you can CLICK HERE for Part One – and CLICK HERE for Part Two


The creation of a Western Canada is not an easy undertaking and cannot succeed without widespread public support.

In the wake of anxiety over the shut down of the gas and oil sector and more anxiety over the coronavirus threat, people are in no mood to take risks with an unfamiliar governing model. They are not going to jump over a cliff.

Several readers have expressed a preference for forming a Republic rather than a Constitutional Monarchy. That is not a panacea or solution. There are 147 Republics word wide. Of those only 28 have ministries subject to parliamentary confidence. 62 including the United Stated have a president independent of the legislature. I am not opposed to a Republic, but creating a workable republic will take even more work and we are then proposing a marked difference from familiar governance.

The Western Canada model has to closely resemble the current Canada model. That is why I am recommending the use of the British North America Act as a template, modified to meet Western Canada needs. I will go further an recommend that we retain the Monarch as our Head of State and apply to become a Commonwealth nation.

There are currently 30 Constitutional Monarchies in the world. Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Cambodia, Canada, Denmark, Grenada, Jamaica, Japan, Lesotho, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Thailand, Tuvalu & United Kingdom.

There are sound reasons for that approach. If Western Canada is accepted by Great Britain and other Commonwealth nations, we have solid allies worldwide that can help us find our feet and it will frustrate forces that try to block us.

That is why I would recommend applying to the United Nations for recognition and membership. We should also open talks with the USA and Mexico for recognition and inclusion in the new NAFTA and inclusion in NORAD. We need to leverage our military bases in Alberta and Manitoba as well as marine bases on the West Coast which are all vital to North American defence.

People need assurance that their governance and legal systems will be unchanged, except that they will be more efficient, effective and responsive.

We need to have international recognition and support so we can negotiate on an equal basis with Canada. We will not approach Canada hat-in-hand seeking permission to succeed. Canada will have to deal with an accomplished fact.  

We would adopt most of the Canadian legal system modified where necessary. Our Criminal Code should mirror the Canadian Criminal code with modification to the firearms section. Our citizens should know that familiar law will not be much different than what they are used to. We have no reason to import the Firearms Act, Official Languages Act or much of the convoluted environmental legislation. Our provincial governments are capable stewards of air, land and water quality.

The largest single problem that Canada has is that the amendment of its constitution is nearly impossible. It is locked into a constitution that does not address many modern issues that did not exist a century ago. Western Canada can overcome that with a more flexible constitution that will allow us to correct errors and missteps inevitable in forming a new nation.

A key is open public engagement from the outset. Once a draft constitution is completed, it has to be shared with the public before adoption. People need to see what they are being asked to support. The same goes for other key pieces of legislation such as the Criminal Code, the Elections Act and the Parliament Act.

We need to build the infrastructure to ensure that provincial residents can elect 104 members of the Western Canada Parliament to properly shepherd the new nation into being. They answer to the people who elected hem. We can, and should amend that Parliament Act that we adopt to prohibit political parties from dictating to elected representatives. They are there to represent their constituents, not anyone or anything else.

Similarly, residents can elect two Senators from each province to serve a fixed term. Senators have to swear an oath of political neutrality to take their seats. Their job is to review legislation and policies strictly on the terms of benefits or detriments to the people of their province. That is the proper function of a Senate.

These are more of the issues that need fulsome discussion and debate before launching an effort to create a Western Canada. I have avoided the separation debate largely because I have felt that the key elements have not been adequately discussed.

Getting angry and walking out is not viable. When that door slams, we have to have a workable plan that has been lacking.

Western Canada will be responsible for the lives, liberty and well-being of about 12 million people. We can’t manage that without sound planning and enormous preparations that are part of it.

John Feldsted ... in a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.


  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

THE SIDEWINDER -- Just quit your constant damned whining and do something positive about it

  Living in a democracy is a wonderful thing, but it comes with responsibilities such as voting and being involved. When the dust settled on Saturdays (October 24 th ) BC election, less than two thirds of the eligible voters * took the time to vote - but the loudest bitchers will probably be among the more than one third of voters who sat on their asses and complained about how all politicians are crooks, etc. How many of you constant whiners have ever done anything close to becoming involved; or do you just like sniveling to hear your own voice? Are you one the arseholes who likes to take advantage of everything our democracy has to offer, without ever contributing anything? And I don't want to listen to your crap about paying taxes, blah, blah, blah. There's more to making democracy work than simply voting and then sitting back and let others carry the ball for you. Too many people seem unwilling to get involved - and follow-up - to make sure elected po

AARON GUNN -- He is, at his core, an ideologue, meaning the facts of any particular issue don’t actually matter

Ben Isitt - City Councillor and Regional Director Victoria City Council and its resident-genius Ben Isitt is back with another dumb idea. Introducing a motion to ban the horse-drawn carriages that have coloured Victoria’s downtown streets for decades, calling them “an outdated mode of transportation”. Are you serious?   No one is actually commuting by horse and carriage. They are here for tourists and residents alike to interact with world-class animals and discover the magic and history of our provincial capital. It’s part of what gives Victoria its charm. And the truth is these horses are treated better than anywhere else in the world. They probably live better lives than many British Columbians.   And talk to anyone who works with these horses and they’ll all tell you the exact same thing: this is what the horses love to do. This is what they were bred for and trained for. This is what gives their lives purpose and meaning. But maybe we shouldn’t be su


I have just struggled through Cheryl Ashlie's column ( MacDuff’s Call: A political novice with a sizeable ego ), in the Sept. 22 edition of The Maple Ridge News. To say the least, Ashlie's comments are naive and show just how totally out of touch she has become with political reality. Ashlie lauds the decision of Darryl Plecas to accept John Horgan's invitation to become the Speaker of the House, a move described by almost everyone else as self-serving and a betrayal of the trust of the constituents who voted for him. Ashlie claims Plecas' turncoat move will help provide good governance but in making this claim, she fails to explain how he will achieve this lofty goal.


Show more