Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

THE SIDEWINDER – What is a Conservative"

I have always considered myself a conservative person -- both socially and politically -- but this is by my own definition which will almost certainly clash with other people's views of conservatism.


In general terms, being politically conservative means exercising caution when considering change, following traditional ways, and having a practical and ethical social conscience. Being socially conservative means following much the same philosophy in terms of environment and lifestyle.


In my view, a conservative approach to social issues must be inclusive and reflect a strong social conscience.

 

“In my opinion, a truly conservative approach to change simply
means making sure the change is going to enhance life
in our
democracy for everyone and is not based on purely partisan views”


It has always annoyed me that the NDP and its predecessor, the
Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), portray themselves as the only political party with social conscience, something that is remarkably inaccurate and misleading.


It is in the nature of being conservative that we must consider the well being of everyone living on this planet.


For most of my adult life I have been a member of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. At one time, I quit the party for several years because too many elected members forgot what being a conservative really means.


Since then, the leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada has largely returned to its basic roots.


Now that I have stated my definition of what I consider being a conservative means, I will offer a few examples of those things, or people, that do not meet my personal definition of conservative standards ethically, socially or politically.


Peter MacKay and other opportunists jump right out and land right on top of my list of people who are definitely not conservative. He is one of those people currently vying for leadership of the Conservative Party of Canada.

MacKay’s brand of conservatism is not conservative. His attitude seems to be totally invested in eastern Canada, as shown by his negative response to an invitation to participate in the leadership debate which took place in Vancouver last night.


MacKay is a one of the Brian Mulroney old boys club; those conservatives whose backroom tactics played a significant role, over the years, in the decision of too many members to part company with the party.


In my opinion, a truly conservative approach to change simply means making sure the change is going to enhance life in our democracy for everyone and is not based on purely partisan views.


The good old boys’ school of backroom politics, favouritism and cronyism has plagued most major Canadian political parties nationally and provincially for decades.


Once again, this is something that is definitely not conservative, in nature, because it too frequently operates without conscience or respect. It is all about power and influence without consideration for those values which make Canada a beacon for freedom and democracy throughout the world.


With the exception of MacKay and a few others, long time Conservatives have returned to the values which made the party a formidable force for change in Canada.


Careful consideration by party members of the other candidates currently vying for leadership of the federal Conservatives could help restore voter faith in the party ... and help send Justin Trudeau packing.

 

SANDY Macdougall ... is a retired newspaper reporter. He was elected for three consecutive terms to Maple Ridge municipal council in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and also ran for the Progressive Conservatives in Kim Campbell's ill-fated federal election campaign. He now makes his home in the BC interior community of Kelowna.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

PEATS: I am writing with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community

The following is a copy of a letter sent to me, which was sent to BC’s Minister of Health Adrian Dix. It is with regards to the impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic in Dawson Creek.   Dear Minister,   I am writing to you today with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community. The closure, scheduled for the summer of 2024, is a result of the utterly burdensome terms and conditions imposed by the bureaucratic Northern Health. As a result, Dawson Creek stands to lose four doctors who have made this city their home, and who wish to continue serving the people of our community.   The impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic is a significant blow to our city. Not only will it result in the loss of highly qualified and dedicated healthcare professionals, but it will also deprive thousands of Dawson Creek residents of access to their primary physicians. At a time when healthcare se

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Labels

Show more