Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- The idea of a guaranteed minimum income has never been so viable. Correctly implemented, it could solve many of our economic and social problems


Guaranteed basic income tops policy priorities for Liberal caucus at upcoming convention. Caucus is calling on government to adopt idea for consideration in November

Joan Bryden -- The Canadian Press / CBC News -- Sep 12, 2020

A guaranteed basic income for all Canadians has emerged as the top policy choice of Liberal MPs, just as the Trudeau government is crafting its plan to help people weather the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and rebuild the ravaged economy ...

- - - - - - - - - - - - -

The concept of a guaranteed minimum income is hardly new. It is an NDP dream, which is why the liberal caucus is so in favour. It almost guarantees passage of the Throne Speech.

Combine this with the recent announcement of a revamp of the EI program to extend COVID wage loss benefits, and Liberal tactics become even more evident.

Buy votes with government borrowing.

The idea of a guaranteed minimum income has never been so viable. Correctly implemented, it could solve many of our economic and social problems.

I have not gone socialist. Please hear me out.

We have dozens and dozens of federal and provincial programs created to help out the less fortunate. They are not coordinated or rational. Some help while others do not. What they all share is high administration costs.

Since the program would erase opportunities for governments to announce plans to give us a tiny fraction of the money, they confiscate from us as a gregarious benefit, I doubt that the Liberal caucus has thought this through

A guaranteed income would erase the need for many of these piecemeal programs.

With a guaranteed income in place, the need for EI disappears. People who suddenly find themselves unemployed have a fallback, which will guarantee the basics. The list of programs that become redundant and unnecessary is long.

The guaranteed income opponents will be the public sector unions. They will lose thousands of jobs with programs no longer delivered. The welfare industry would shrink to a fraction of what it is today. Most social work positions would disappear.

Governments would have to increase personal income tax exceptions to match the guaranteed income, which would benefit everyone. Let's imagine that the income level is $25,000 or $2,083 per month. That is barely adequate for a single person but sufficient for a pair.

The next income strata, from $25,001 to $50,000 would have a 15% flat tax applied to 50% of earnings. From $50,001 to $75,000 a 15% tax would apply to 75% of earnings.

A universal minimum wage of $12 per hour would apply. Onerous EI premiums would disappear, relieving employers of a sizeable employer tax burden. CPP premiums would continue, but the employer share would decrease over a decade to nil. People would have the option of monthly contributions to a non-taxable retirement savings plan of their choosing.

The need for daycare spaces would sharply diminish. The minimum income is more than the net income of many working spouses. That opens the door to families deciding on a stay-home parent or a parent with part-time work to accommodate children without the costs of daycare.

As with other plans, a minimum income scheme is only viable if it frees people from tax slavery. Since the program would erase opportunities for governments to announce plans to give us a tiny fraction of the money, they confiscate from us as a gregarious benefit, I doubt that the Liberal caucus has thought this through and is serious.

We don't need more smoke and mirrors to distract us from the failings of our governments.

The liberal minimum income strategy appears to be "sunny days, sunny ways" version 2.0.

We have not begun to face the debts and interest load of version 1 and do not need more of the same. Grand assurances of great things to come are an inadequate remedy for the pain most Canadians are facing.

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a


Show more