Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN – In the coming year the BC NDP Cabinet is facing massive tests of courage


 

Firstly, the answer is NO to the question being asked of every politician in Canada right now. I have barely left my house in Tsartlip during the holiday season never mind the city, province or country.

 

Former Ontario Finance Minister Rod Phillips said no one was more disappointed than he is about his shocking decision to fly to the Caribbean for a little COVID-19 vacation. [1] I hope he enjoyed it while it lasted, I was home dodging rain drops and celebrating the holiday season with my family via video chats.

 

Facing bias, stigmas and fallacies:
There is not a more poignant example of a bias we need to extinguish than the stigma of people who suffer from poor mental health and addictions. In the coming year we are going to have to get real and honest about the crisis of anxiety, fear and depression plaguing our society. It’s hard to imagine that in our world that offers anything you want for a price you can afford, that there is still so much sadness.

 

In the past few years too many of our friends, family members, neighbours, and co-workers have taken their own lives, or have died as a result of poisonous street drugs. Well-rooted biases against people who struggle with mental health and/or use illicit drugs have muted the response of government institutions and their political heads. We have failed to act with the urgency that is needed!

 

We must set aside this bias, stop treating people with health issues as criminals, and provide access to the treatment and medicine that they need. In the coming year I will have little patience for the political rhetoric that has excused our lack of desperation. This must be the year of action.

 

In 2021, decision-makers in British Columbia will be tested by the status quo and sunk costs biases in many ways.

 

The status quo bias is “when people prefer things to stay the same by doing nothing or by sticking with a decision made previously.” [2]

 

Forestry:

This well explains forestry policy in British Columbia. Fibre has been the highest value our government has put on our forests since the first European ships arrived on the Pacific coast. We may eventually get to advancing a more holistic approach to landscape management in our province, but until then politicians continue to talk and log.

 

The pressure is building as tens of thousands of concerned British Columbians demand Premier John Horgan live up to his promises to implement the recommendations of the old growth review panel. Will his government have the courage? Will they demonstrate the leadership needed to change forestry policy in British Columbia? We shall see.

 

 

BC Hydro’s Site C Dam:

The sunk cost bias is when we “continue a behavior or endeavor as a result of previously invested resources (time, money or effort).” [3] Also known as the sunk cost fallacy, this will pose a significant challenge for Premier Horgan, and all the BC NDP Cabinet Ministers, as they face the hard truths about BC Hydro’s Site C dam project.

 

As Premier Horgan, and Energy Minister Bruce Ralston, deflect responsibility and blame the BC Liberals, there should be no doubt that Site C is a BC NDP project now. [4]

 

In 2017, only the BC NDP made the decision to proceed with the project. At the time Mr. Horgan justified it saying, “to cancel it would add billions to the Province’s debt – putting at risk our ability to deliver housing, childcare, schools and hospitals for families across B.C. And that’s a price we’re not willing to pay.” [5]

 

Now we are three years down the road and with calls for an inquiry into Site C to get to the bottom of who knew what and for how long, Mr. Horgan and Mr. Ralston pushed the decision on the project until we learn the findings of the much-anticipated Milburn report. [6] It is eerily reminiscent of late 2017, the first time a Horgan Government struggled with sunk costs on Site C.

 

In the coming year the BC NDP Cabinet is facing massive tests of courage. How will they address the substantial status quo and sunk costs biases that all decision-makers confront?

 

On behalf of all British Columbians, it is my hope for 2021 that they can overcome these entrenched biases and pass the tests.

 

 

Adam Olsen (SȾHENEP) ... is the MLA-elect for Saanich North and the Islands and member of the B.C. Green Caucus. He was first elected to the British Columbia Legislative Assembly in May 2017 and re-elected in October 2020.

 

Born in Victoria, BC, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more