Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – Democratic institutions require that those elected to governing bodies be committed to democratic principles first and always

 

Watching CBC and CTV coverage of the events in Washington during on Wednesday was mind-blowing. Canadian media reporters were pro-Democrat and virulently anti-Trump. The message was clear that current President Trump was entirely to blame for an assault on the American Capitol.

I do not condone political violence. It is the prelude to war. The foundation of democracy is to replace violent disputes with debate and an orderly expression of will through an independent and trusted secret ballot.


Events in America should alarm us. Listening to the Democratic and Republican House leaders talk about the sacredness of the Capitol chambers they occupy was disgusting. The occupants define the chambers. A contingent of amoral con-men and grifters in a cathedral will express the cathedral’s reputation.

And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the money changers, and the seats of them that sold doves, And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.

You need not be a Christian or member of any faith to understand the principle.

 

Democratic institutions require that those elected to governing bodies be committed to democratic principles first and always. Election to office does not create a democrat, but a tyrant’s election can sully a democratic institution.

The demonstrations in Washington and elsewhere in the US were expressions of frustration due to state officials’ failure to maintain confidence in the electoral system. Refusing to consider requests for recounts and reviews of suspected fraud invited the conclusion that there was something to hide.

The reaction should have been to undertake audits and prove that the electoral system was immune to fraud and gerrymandering attempts. Instead, the electoral system’s reputation hangs in tatters and will be an issue in the 2022 mid-term elections.

The refusal to audit election proceedings was wrong. When protestors persisted, election officials claimed there was no evidence of wrongdoing, but evidence depended on an election audit they refused to conduct. The stonewalling was a pernicious abdication of fiduciary responsibility.    

The concept that state election officials can dictate how to conduct a democratic election is rubbish. They must prove to electors that only qualified electors have voted and that there is no interference or meddling in how valid votes are counted and tabulated. The tail cannot be allowed to wag the dog.

‘The lady doth protest too much, methinks,’ is one of those lines from Shakespeare’s Hamlet that is quite simple but expresses enormous complexity of thought and emotion.

 

Calls for investigation into US Presidential election results were treated as personal criticisms of state election officials rather than calls to analyze the system they administer. Scoundrels wrapping themselves in the flag and declaring unwavering patriotism is not an acceptable response to calls for investigation of potential dereliction of duty.

The events playing out in the USA are of interest to us in Canada as our governments increasingly answer valid questions with “move along, nothing to see here.” Answer our questions, and we will decide if there is or is not something to concern us. 

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PEATS: I am writing with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community

The following is a copy of a letter sent to me, which was sent to BC’s Minister of Health Adrian Dix. It is with regards to the impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic in Dawson Creek.   Dear Minister,   I am writing to you today with a critical concern regarding the imminent closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic, a vital healthcare facility in our community. The closure, scheduled for the summer of 2024, is a result of the utterly burdensome terms and conditions imposed by the bureaucratic Northern Health. As a result, Dawson Creek stands to lose four doctors who have made this city their home, and who wish to continue serving the people of our community.   The impending closure of the Eljen Medical Clinic is a significant blow to our city. Not only will it result in the loss of highly qualified and dedicated healthcare professionals, but it will also deprive thousands of Dawson Creek residents of access to their primary physicians. At a time when healthcare se

Selina Robinson: "You broke my heart . . ." (The Real Story)

The mildly Zionist, innocuously leftish and now ousted advanced education minister’s letter to her New Democratic Party caucus colleagues, explaining why she has resigned the caucus to sit as an independent. The letter is an historic document, an artifact of the disgraceful cultural moment we’re living through. It’s important. It’s also a scorcher. It’s gathering a heck of a lot of attention . I’m printing it in full here. I’ve been insisting that what happened to Robinson is a much bigger deal and a completely different story than the one we’d all been led to believe. The necessary background: My piece in the National Post: The despicable untruths behind Selina Robinson's political lynching . More importantly , a Real Story investigation: The Problem With The Selina Robinson Story. . . It wasn't true. What follows is the story of what really happened. Let’s just get into it. Apart from punctuation and spelling I replicate the letter faithfully, with some further comm

Poll finds ignorance regarding BC NDP decision to co-manage public lands with indigenous (Western Standard)

. . . . The poll allowed British Columbians to give weight to key priorities. More than half say that the respect for reconciliation and the leadership shown by the government in including indigenous partners in decisions are both important to them. That said, concerns about further complicating resource development (which already necessitates the consideration of indigenous peoples' interests in relevant regions) and economic risks, are equally weighted by the population. ARI also found there is a sense the consultation timeline has been rushed. One-quarter (26%) say the current timeline offered by the government is acceptable. But more disagree, including half (48%) who want to see more consultation, extending deliberations into the fall or later this year, and one-quarter (27%) who want to kill the proposed changes entirely . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more