Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

DAN McTEAGUE – “45 by 30” ... The Trudeau climate train wreck that needs to be stopped


The Prime Minister of Canada committed on Thursday to “blow past” (Trudeau pledges to slash greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40% by 2030) our proposed Paris Accord emission target of 30% reductions in GHG emissions (from a 2005 baseline) by 2030, and get to 40-45% reductions.


What a coward, eh? Why not 50%? Or 60%? Why not 100%? Needless to say, I am kidding.


But at a certain point – and we passed it a long time ago – the numbers mean absolutely nothing to anyone. So why not bigger ones? Just keep making it up as you go. 


Erin O’Toole has bought in – he is saying the same thing, only using a slightly smaller number. 


Corporations across Canada are doing the same, making bizarre commitments to distant targets – 2030 or net zero or whatever else - hoping that nobody will hold them accountable and that, by parroting the Prime Ministyer and others, they will avoid criticism.


This is astoundingly irresponsible. 


It is an abdication of responsibility by the Prime Minister, by his cabinet, by his lapdog backbenchers, by Erin O’Toole, by his lapdog MPs, by corporate executives, by media, and by anyone who says this is achievable.


These targets are not achievable. 


Environment Canada released data earlier this month (Greenhouse gas emissions - showing that 2019 saw emissions increase over the previous year. Measured against the 2005 baseline year, emissions had only decreased by 1%. 


So, in 14 years emissions had been reduced by 1%. Not only that, but during these 14 years all kinds of coal plants were shut down – so the so-called “low-hanging fruit” of emissions reductions only helped enough to deliver 1% of decline!


Current commitments say we have to reduce emissions by another 29% below 2019 levels by 2030.


Think about that:

  • 14 years to reduce emissions 1%.
  • 11 years to reduce emissions by another 29%.


Simple math says that means reducing emissions at about 35 times as fast as we have reduced them so far. And remember – the reductions we made so far have cost a great deal of money – electricity rates in Ontario shot up on the back of coal-fired facility closings.


If your energy prices shoot up in an effort to deliver 1% reductions, how much more will they shoot up if you have to start going at 35 times the speed?


But wait - now the Prime Minister says we will “blow past” that target. He wants to be at a 45% reduction. That means going over 50 times as fast. There is a train wreck about to happen, and the PM just sped up the train. 


We are in the midst of a dramatic lockdown. 2020 numbers aren’t out yet, but estimates are the lockdowns will have reduced emissions by 7% last year (Global carbon emissions down by record 7% in 2020).


Complete economic discord, massive social dislocation, and more – and only 7% in emission reductions. And now the Prime Minister says let’s get to 45% - that would mean making things 6 to 7 times worse.


Folks, this ain’t going to happen, and trying to make it happen is going to destroy our economy. Someone needs to stand up and say “stop the climate train wreck.”


Write to the Prime Minister, to your MP, your MPP/MLA/MNA. Call your utility or other energy provider. Ask them straight up: Tell me how much this is going to cost?


We need to stop this train before it wrecks the country.



Dan McTeague … is President of Canadians For Affordable Energy.

An 18-year veteran of the House of Commons, Dan is widely known in both official languages for his tireless work on energy pricing and saving Canadians money through accurate price forecasts. His Parliamentary initiatives, aimed at helping Canadians cope with affordable energy costs, led to providing Canadians heating fuel rebates on at least two occasions.

Widely sought for his extensive work and knowledge in energy pricing, Dan continues to provide valuable insights to North American media and policy makers. He brings three decades of experience and proven efforts on behalf of consumers in both the private and public spheres. Dan is committed to improving energy affordability for Canadians and promoting the benefits we all share in having a strong and robust energy sector.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

WUN FEATHER -- can we just put those two names to bed for a while? You can call me an ‘Indian’ and I won't mind. And let's not call the farmers and ranchers ‘Settlers’ anymore

Hey there # TeamCanada !   I can't take it any more! Well, I guess I can, but I don't want to. I want to talk about the names we call each other. My very best friends, and all my Elderly Aunts and Uncles call me an Indian. I have walked into the most magnificent dining hall at the Air Liquide Head office, Quai D'orsay in Paris, France, surrounded by the worlds top producing Cryogenics team, and Patrick Jozon, the President of Air Liquide, has seen me enter the room, and yelled: " Bonjour! There is Warren! He is my Indian friend from Canada! He and I chased Beavers together in Northern BC!" And over 400 people turned to look at me and then they all smiled, and nodded. To most European people, an Indian is an absolute ICON!   The ultimate symbol of North America. They love us. And then, one time I had just gotten married and took vacation days off to take my new wife to meet my Grandmother; I was so proud. But as soon a


Show more