Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED – The road to infamy

 Conservative leader Erin O'Toole


In the messy business of retail politics, marketing the party brand to acquire support and votes tends to obliterate the policies and principles that attracted core supporters at the outset.

Political support is erratic, fickle, fleeting, and ranges from extremes. At one end, we have the disenchanted and disengaged who see no value in voting as nothing changes except the faces in the media. On the other, we have those who follow trends without critical thinking. Many are motivated by perceived leaders whether or not these candidates are competent. Celebrity status is a consideration.

Political party insiders get so wrapped up in surveys, statistics, marketing strategies, opinion panels and election preparation they forget who they are and why they exist. Here’s a case in point:

Erin O’Toole says Conservatives’ rejection of climate change resolution was ’a distraction.’  CPC leader dismisses resolution as ‘the obsession of many people on Twitter’     John Paul Tasker & Jayme Poisson // CBC News

Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole told CBC News a recent vote by party delegates to reject adding “climate change is real” to the policy book was a disappointment that distracted from the party’s larger plan to levy a price on carbon.

In a wide-ranging interview with CBC’s Front Burner, O’Toole said he believes the members assembled for the party’s March policy convention weren’t rejecting the actual science of climate change but rather a resolution that was “hard to understand.”

The motion also asked delegates to recognize that “Canadian businesses classified as highly polluting need to take more responsibility” and “reduce their GHG emissions,” and that the Conservative party should support “innovation in green technologies.” It was rejected by a margin of 54 per cent to 46.

It was not the outcome I would have liked coming out of the convention floor, for sure,” O’Toole said.

O’Toole said media stories about the resolution’s demise derailed what was otherwise a well-run convention that exposed few cleavages in the party ranks. (Anti-abortion resolutions from the party’s social conservative wing didn’t secure enough votes to even make it to the convention floor.)

O’Toole said his “well-received” speech from the night before — in which he detailed a five-point plan for a post-COVID-19 Canada — was overshadowed by an onslaught of negative commentary on social media about a climate resolution that was essentially meaningless.

 

 

Many long-term conservative activists and supporters are tired of managed conventions where party executives and insiders decide what issues will not be debated. That is not an open and accountable party and is a signal of how these people will govern.

No issue should be considered politically toxic; doing so avoids practical examination of emotional topics, which is unhealthy for our society. Wherever we refuse to deal with emotionally charged issues such as racism, abortion, assisted dying, systemic sexual misconduct, or gay and lesbian persons, we eventually reach a critical point where entrenched biases have to give way.

Then the pendulum of public opinion swings hard in the opposing direction again making toxic, rational discussion of these topics, but for different reasons. What should have been a step toward increased empathy, understanding and a more open and inclusive society is destroyed by people intent on revenge for perceived and actual wrongs.

The alleged science underlying global warming and climate change has collapsed. Michael Mann has refused to release details of his climate calculations and modelling for peer review. Without modelling publication and peer review, the IPCC position on climate change is based on worthless junk science.      

Mr. O’Toole was elected as leader and spokesperson for the conservative party, but that does not absolve him of a responsibility to listen to delegates representing members. They accepted his speech from the evening before but did not agree with everything he said. Dealing with the rebuke on carbon taxes like a petulant child has cost him support and an election.

We don’t need a leader easily influenced to adopt harmful carbon taxing to appease a vocal minority who have not applied critical thinking to claims put forth by people with vested and conflicts of interest in vilifying the oil and gas industry. Gore and Suzuki have become rich postulating IPCC chicanery.

Enriching foreign charlatans is not in Canada’s best interests.

 

John Feldsted ... is a political commentator, consultant, and strategist. He makes his home in Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more