Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FRASER INSTITUTE Canada has not recently tried to simplify the tax system and has demonstrated little concerted effort at regulatory reduction or simplification


Tax complexity matters to all Canadians, mostly owing to the considerable resources and time that families and businesses spend on compliance.

Many of us incur substantial costs: time invested and money spent on professional legal and accounting services, and on tax preparers and tax software. Further, the Canadian tax system is recognized as being complex, hard to understand, and in urgent need of reform.

This study uses three broad categories of indicators to measure tax complexity: tax expenditures, tax legislation, and tax guides. Each indicator empirically measures a different aspect of tax complexity, and all three indicate that Canada’s tax system has become increasingly complex since 1996.

The number of federal personal income tax (PIT) tax expenditures increased from 111 to 146 (32 percent) from 1996 to 2016.

The number of federal corporate income tax (CIT) tax expenditures increased from 66 to 76 (15 percent)

And … the number of federal goods and services tax (GST) expenditures increased too, but to a lesser degree (9 percent).

The dollar value of federal tax expenditures has also markedly increased over the same period. PIT tax expenditures have grown by 55 percent, adjusted for inflation, while corporate income tax expenditures and GST tax expenditures grew by 51 percent and 48 percent respectively.

Tax legislation has steadily grown in size and volume.

Between 1990 and 2018, the text area occupied by the Income Tax Act and regulations increased 72 percent, from 974,050 cm² to 1,673,802 cm². While the number of pages increased by only 2 percent, page size increased by 69 percent over the same period.

Our third indicator of tax complexity is the length of the instructions required to complete a basic personal return. From 2001 to 2016, the length of the federal personal income tax guide for Ontario increased from 48 to 78 pages, for 63 percent growth over the 15-year time-frame.

Perhaps the biggest impact on perceived complexity and compliance costs in the past few decades is the popularity of personal and business tax form completion tools, coupled with the software’s subsequent internet enablement, now allowing most Canadians to complete all filing steps electronically. This is a profound change, and paper is now disappearing as a major tax filing mechanism.


As paper filings have shrunk, the number and share of tax returns submitted through Efile and Netfile mechanisms have grown substantially. Efile, the fastest growing mechanism, allows authorized tax preparers to electronically file returns, while Netfile enables taxpayers to file their own returns using readily available internet-enabled tax software.

Canadian taxpayers have also had access to an “Auto-fill” option since 2015.

This enables tax filers to download information from their income tax slips after obtaining data access through the Canada Revenue Agency. The use of Auto-fill went up sharply between the 2015 and 2016 tax years (468 percent), and increased again for the 2017 tax year. Usage is above 18 percent for all age groups over 20, tends to rise with income, and varies among the provinces.

While the introduction and growth in Auto-fill, Netfile, and Efile mechanisms may be productive in reducing the time and cost of compliance, these changes do not address the underlying complexity of the tax system, nor necessarily help taxpayers understand the tax system.

The risks are that Canadians may not be fully aware of their tax obligations, or understand how to make better choices to reduce their liabilities, and they may become complacent.


What is clear is that our indicators suggest an increase in federal tax complexity since the turn of the century: the number of credits, deductions, exemptions, exclusions, and other preferences, the text length of tax legislation, and the size of the federal personal income tax guide all increased by double-digit percentages.

Federal tax complexity is clearly increasing in Canada over time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kamloops woman’s cancer test cancelled due to Interior Health mandates for OB/GYNs (iNFO News)

A Kamloops woman’s cancer screening appointment was considered urgent by her doctors and scheduled within weeks, but it was postponed indefinitely when Interior Health ordered her gynecologist take that day’s on-call shift. Troylana Manson now waits with the mystery of whether she might have cancer amid a staffing crisis for women’s health care specialists in Kamloops. “I was happy to have that appointment in December so we could rule this out, but now it’s thrown in the air again. People in Kamloops, certainly people in positions of power, need to realize what Interior Health is doing”  ... CLICK HERE for the full story

One arrested at OneBC event at UVic that draws protesters (Times Colonist)

A would-be speaker was arrested under the Trespass Act after she arrived at the University of Victoria on Tuesday for an event intended to shed light on what the OneBC political party refers to as the “reconciliation industry.”  An officer at the scene initially said two people were arrested, after protesters scuffled with those trying to hold the unsanctioned event. Saanich police issued a statement later Tuesday saying only one person was arrested.  Police did not name the person who was arrested, but OneBC leader Dallas Brodie said it was Frances Widdowson, who was later released ... CLICK HERE for the full story 

Eby misled British Columbians about Cowichan appeal; court records show no stay was ever filed; Conservative leader John Rustad

Conservative Opposition Leader John Rustad says Premier David Eby has been caught misleading the public after court records confirmed the government never filed the stay of the Cowichan ruling the NDP repeatedly promised. “For four months, the Premier said the stay was being sought, the Attorney General claimed the application was underway, and the government told British Columbians that action was coming. The court record shows they did nothing,” said Rustad. “Not one stay, not one application, not one motion. They made promises to homeowners while the registry sat empty.” Premier Eby first promised on August 11, 2025, that a stay would be filed, then again in October, and twice in Question Period when pressured by the opposition. A review of court documents on Friday revealed that no stay has been filed. Rustad said the stay was the single legal measure that could pause the ruling and protect homeowners in Richmond and across the province while appeals move forward. By...

Labels

Show more