Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHY IS THE GOVERNMENT giving taxpayer money to the BC Indigenous Cannabis Business Fund, to go into direct competition with private sector businesses?

 

I noted three things in news stories, in recent days, regarding our Indigenous neighbours, and they had me asking questions that I think at least some of us should be considering.

The first thing was a Global News story from Friday:

First Nations people continue to be disproportionately and devastatingly affected by B.C.’s toxic drug crisis, with 2022 being the deadliest year on record, according to the First Nations Health Authority.

Data released by the FNHA on Friday shows that First Nations people died at 5.9 times the rate of other residents last year, with
373 toxic drug-poisoning deaths in total. It’s a 6.3-per-cent increase from 2021.


The second was a April 20th media announcement from the Assembly of First Nations, and the First Nations Leadership Council (FNLC), which in part stated:

First Nations have inherent rights and jurisdiction to govern the cultivation, processing, sale, and consumption of cannabis in their territories. Despite persistent advocacy, First Nations' distinct rights and unique needs were ignored by colonial governments during the legalization of cannabis.

Five years later, Canada’s legislative framework for cannabis still does not provide appropriate avenues for coordination between jurisdictions or appropriate fiscal relationships that reflect the recognition of First Nations' jurisdiction over cannabis.

First Nations businesses also continue to be challenged by excessive taxation and onerous regulations
.

Then today, and perhaps deliberately buried on the weekend so as to have the fewest eyes possible see it, was the third item … a media release from the Mike Farnworth’s Public Safety and Solicitor General’s Ministry, which began by stating:



The Province is providing additional funding to the B.C. Indigenous Cannabis Business Fund (ICBF) to support Indigenous participation in the regulated cannabis industry.

 

Launched in December 2022, the ICBF supports First Nations communities and Indigenous businesses in British Columbia that want to increase their participation in, or join, the regulated cannabis industry.

 

Nearly $2.3 million will be provided to the New Relationship Trust, which is responsible for administering the program, to increase the number of Indigenous businesses that could receive support through the fund. The new, one-time funding is in addition to the original joint contribution of as much as $7.5 million by the Province and the federal government over three years.

Now, let me begin by saying there are thousands upon thousands of British Columbians who are able to enjoy recreational use of cannabis with absolutely no repercussions to their everyday life. For some however, it leads to a lack of ambition, motivation, and in some instances it’s a pathway to harder drugs and addiction – and sadly, as the Global News story stated death from overdoses and a poisoned drug supply.

Which leads me to the media release from the Assembly of First Nations, which to me is like the pot calling the kettle black.  The release states, ‘
First Nations have inherent rights and jurisdiction to govern the cultivation, processing, sale, and consumption of cannabis in their territories’.

Not only are they satisfied to grow, and sell, cannabis, to be consumed by the public, including their own people (note the statements regarding addictions and deaths), they want to have their own ‘distinct rights and unique needs’ apply – which I take to mean different than the rules, regulations, and standards applied to everyone else in the cannabis industry.

In other words, the First Nations Leadership Council isn’t content to have the same opportunities as everyone else, they want less taxation … less regulation … and special / unique accommodations.

The FNLC is calling for the issues of jurisdiction, economic development, taxation, revenue sharing, and health and safety for First Nations to be meaningfully addressed in amendments to the 
Cannabis Act in partnership with First Nations.

But why should they pay less taxes, have less regulation, and enjoy privileges unique to them, that others in the industry are not privy to?

On top of that, monies from the taxpayers of BC -- including the taxes paid by non-Indigenous owned cannabis operators (to the tune of $9.8 million) -- are being used to expand their penetration in the marketplace.

Basically, taxes from non-Indigenous owned cannabis operators, will be used so that Indigenous owned businesses can go into direct competition against them.  What kind of sense is that?

Earlier today, on both Facebook and Twitter, I asked this question:

The BC government is giving even more money to the BC Indigenous Cannabis Business Fund, to support their participation in the regulated cannabis industry.

My question would be, WHY is the government giving ANY taxpayer money at all, when they're in direct competition with private sector businesses?

Can't they stand on their own two feet?

No one responded to my question, and it’s not the first time this has happened when I have questioned things of a similar nature.

Are people afraid to speak up, and questions things of this nature, for fear of repercussions?

Sadly, I think they are … and that, simply, is not right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

BC child killer's name change prompts criticism, political finger-pointing (Times Colonist)

The fact that child killer Allan Schoenborn has successfully changed his name under BC laws has prompted finger-pointing among politicians. BC Premier David Eby told media Thursday that in 2002 when opposition leader Kevin Falcon was the Minister of Deregulation he removed regulations under the Name Act that ensured name changes would be published publicly in the BC Gazette ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more