Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

SONIA FURSTENAU: NDP plan not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province


Housing has been in the news this week, with the BC Government announcing their "BC Builds" initiative. Reading through this announcement, we learn that the program is designed to "create housing that is affordable for household incomes from $84,780 to $131,950 for a studio or one-bedroom home, or $134,410 to $191,910 for a two-bedroom home"

Apparently, up to 20% of this housing could be up to 20% below market rent... Not exactly a bold solution to the crushing unaffordability of housing in this province. 

It's clear that 'BC Builds' is aimed at providing housing for people who don't urgently need housing. We're in a serious crisis right now, and housing for people with annual incomes over $80k is not the problem; what's missing is housing for those who earn $60k or less per year. Where do they factor into this proposal?

People are on the verge of homelessness. Taking a look at the Rental Housing Index, you can see that for the two lowest-income groups in our province, housing is not only "unaffordable", but in some cases "severely unaffordable". Surely, these are the groups that an NDP government should be prioritizing. Where is the support for the truly middle-income households, who make up over half of B.C.’s population?

Recently released analysis from the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Commission (CMHC) shows that in Vancouver in 2023, for a minimum-wage worker renting the average bachelor unit, over 50% of their monthly income goes towards rent. In Victoria, a worker earning minimum wage would need to allocate more than 40% of their monthly income to afford the average rent. The report also shows that in Victoria, when rental units with long-term tenants become available, the rent is adjusted to align with current market rates. In 2023, this translated to units becoming 41.5% more expensive for incoming tenants. The Cowichan Valley is not far off these numbers, and the growing desperation in our community is palpable.

Yes, we need more housing. But increasing the supply does not lower the cost of housing, when housing is being financialized. When we let hedge funds and private firms manage housing, the ultimate outcome is profits for investors. The issue here is not simply inadequate supply; it is the lack of actions addressing the core need for non-market housing that everyday people can actually afford. 

Let's treat this crisis with the urgency it deserves. We are calling for immediate help for renters. Local and provincial governments can help by putting the brakes on rental increases between tenancies - because a 41.5% increase in rent could mean more people living on the streets, and even bigger problems for our communities in the years to come. 

Sincerely,
Sonia

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

BC child killer's name change prompts criticism, political finger-pointing (Times Colonist)

The fact that child killer Allan Schoenborn has successfully changed his name under BC laws has prompted finger-pointing among politicians. BC Premier David Eby told media Thursday that in 2002 when opposition leader Kevin Falcon was the Minister of Deregulation he removed regulations under the Name Act that ensured name changes would be published publicly in the BC Gazette ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more