Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

KRUGGEL -- Understand that just because you feel something is right, that doesn't make you right


Anti-authority narratives could tear 'fabric of society,' intelligence report warns.

Violent threats have become increasingly common outside of elections’, report says.

This is from the Canadian Press. 

It's a pretty interesting report and you can find it on CTV or CBC.  What they are talking about is the rise of political extremism in Canada, and really the entire world, but on the political right in particular.

Now let me be clear: the vast, vast, vast majority of people on the right are sane, responsible, and good people.  We should always keep this in mind when talking about people sharing labels or being labeled.

Okay, so what about extremists?

Well, we do have an issue with the rise in extremism on the right.  The left has some issues too but this particular story was about the right and how its extreme goes after institutions both public and private.

"Baseless theories, disinformation and misinformation have spread to larger audiences, exposing online users to a vast network of narratives that undermine science, systems of government and traditional figures of authority, the report says."

Yes, that's all correct.

Okay should people challenge things? 

Absolutely.

Don't just accept the narrative put to you.  At the same time, understand that just because you feel something is right, that doesn't make you right.  It also means, if you only look for sources of information that agree with you, you're making a mistake in how you process information and arrive at conclusions.

Violent threats against politicians, judges, teachers, and regular people when disagreements over ideology and policy happen and are becoming increasingly common. 

In December 2020 I posted rebuttals on anti-Pandemic memes on my own Facebook page.  I spurred some good debate.  I also received a lot of harassment including threats of physical arm and explicit death threats.  It got pretty intense.

When I talked about LGBTQ+ issues the threats started up again.

What am I getting at?

Politics isn’t so important that anyone needs to threaten another person over it ... period. Threats are never the answer.  Violence over ideas and disputes is never, ever justified.

The people making threats aren't patriots.  They are criminals.  

 

ABOUT DEVON KRUGGEL:
I'm a 50-year-old Caucasian male and was a right winger of sorts from the age of 16 until I was about 47 or so. I have got a degree in History and Political Science and one in Computer Science. Bachelors. I've been in BC since 1990, and have lived on Vancouver Island since 1993
.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more