Skip to main content

Both the NDP and Social Credit had drag 'em out brawls portraying the other as the worst possible outcome at the ballot box

Currently the next Provincial Election in British Columbia, in May of next year, for the moment appears to be between the BC NDP and the BC Liberals.  Two recent polls had the numbers flipped between each of those parties leading, and both had the BC Conservative Party, and the BC Greens just over double digits.

In it's most simplistic terms, the NDP led by John Horgan are being portrayed as the party of "NO" and being closely affiliated with big labour unions.  Meanwhile the BC Liberals led by Christy Clark promote they are the big tent free-enterprise party.  The Green Party, again using the most simplistic description, could be said to speak for the environment.

So where does that leave the BC Conservative Party?

I described the NDP, Liberals, and Green Parties as championing one specific area, however is there not a way for another party, say the BC Conservatives, to bridge all three?

I remember very well the beginnings of the Reform movement in Canada, and I for one was drawn to become a member of both the BC Reform Party ... and the Reform Party of Canada.

As someone who had come out of the union and NDP movement in the 70s and early 80's, I along with many NDP supporters and union members joined, or became supporters, of the Reform movement.  That happened for several reasons, I believe.

1) The NDP putting crippling taxes on business and the resource industry in BC led to thousands of mines closing and good well-paying union jobs evaporating.

2) The federal Liberal Party virtually crippled the oil based resource industry of Alberta ...

3) Federal parties had little more than disdain for the west

4) Power was centralized with little true 'representation' for individuals and families ... and

5) BC had severely polarized politics, as both the NDP and Social Credit had drag 'em out brawls portraying the other as the worst possible outcome at the ballot box.

Just to name a few ...

Now I am not saying there needs to be a 'reform' revival in British Columbia, however if the BC Conservative Party wishes to be relevant in May 2017, COULD IT possibly do so by bridging the gap between the majority of British Columbians who wish to protect the beauty of our land and seascapes along with our wildlife ... union workers that want to see a future for their jobs, and jobs for their children and the next generation ... policies developed that will rapidly see job growth in the somewhat stagnant resource sector ... putting forth meaningful democratic reforms ... and in numerous other areas?

The BC Conservative Party will have to tap in to the everyday people of BC that the NDP and Liberals claim to represent, but who then give little but lip service after elections are over.

What ground can they stake out ... specifically ... that will differentiate them from the NDP, Liberals, and Greens?   

Here's an idea ... have open town hall meetings with British Columbians across the province and seek input into how government can actually make a positive difference.

Meantime ... I'm interested in hearing from you.  What area, or areas of government are working well ... and what areas need change?  Better yet, if change is needed, how can it be achieved?  Send me your thoughts by email to

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth, and that's what's going through my head right now.


  1. Alan: You really have me confused! A party that thinks it can stand for everything, really stands for nothing!

    Janet G

    1. Greetings Janet ... and my apologies for any confusion.

      I am simply saying that we need a party that will clearly, strongly, and unequivocally state where they stand. The NDP and Liberals both talk out of both sides of their mouth trying to appease all at election time.

      One cannot have a strong economy, with creations of family supporting jobs, with high taxes.
      One cannot have a strong economy when the resource sector is tied up in red tape for year after year
      One cannot have a strong province when segments of society are pitted against each other
      One cannot have a legislature people can be proud of when opposing parties attack each other none stop, and discount any suggestions another has to offer out of hand

      You are absolutely correct that a party that stands for everything, stands for nothing. However, a party that stands for respect, honesty, and collaboration can stand for what will make BC a place where we have a strong economy, where those needing a hand up can be respected, where people needing our health system are cared for quickly, where nature is protected and is there for all to enjoy, and in so many other areas.

      Strong government that knows where it's going ... that's what we should have, and that's what the people of BC need to demand.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“First Past The Post” works close to home by focusing on electoral districts first … “Proportional Representation” tries to fit a size 10 foot into a size 7 shoe by bastardizing electoral districts

MEL ROTHENBERGER: There are so many things wrong with the referendum on proportional representation, it would take as long to cover it all as it would to explain the convoluted and foggy alternatives on the ballot.

So let’s just talk about the hocus pocus of proportional representation (also known as prop rep, pro rep or PR) math. This one giant flaw should be enough to make us run, not walk, away from prop rep.

Throughout the months leading up to this vote, prop rep boosters have relied heavily on a simplistic abracadabra formula to convince us their system makes sense.

Their favourite line is “40 per cent of the votes should equal 40 per cent of the seats,” or variations thereof.

With the current First Past the Post, they say, “39 per cent of the votes = 54 per cent of the seats = 100 per cent of the power” but with PR “39 per cent of the vote = 39 per cent of the seats = Compromise, cooperation, collaboration.” This is labeled “Proportional Representation Math.”

I once called it “voodoo…

What, Judy, is the response, to the urgency and compassion show by British Columbians for WHAT IS NEEDED? What are the ‘action words?’

Today is International Overdose Awareness Day.  Did you know such a day existed?
I wasn’t until early this morning.My God, it’s pathetic we even need to have a day like this to mark – and celebrate is obviously a word that would never be used for an occasion like this!
So, for an occasion such as this, Judy Darcy, Minister of Mental Health and Addictions, trotted out ‘words’, because, at least in my opinion, they are easy to say.
Today marks International Overdose Awareness Day, and we honour and remember those we have lost to this terrible crisis. Last year, we lost 1,450 people here in B.C., and by the end of this day three or four more British Columbians will die from a drug overdose as a result of a poisoned and unpredictable illegal drug supply.”

All talk … but little action!
As I mentioned yesterday, on July 18th, the BC Centre On Substance Use, released all of the ‘words’ necessary for our BC NDP government to ‘actually’ begin the process to slow down this terrible crisis, and hel…

RUSTAD: New approach needed to fight wildfires