Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

IPCC has no ideal what proportion of total carbon emissions are man-made, but insist that the only solution to global warming is to reduce those which are man-made


Climate politics heating up after the UN releases bombshell report on global warming 
Alex Ballingall  ~~  THE STAR  ~~  Oct. 9, 2018

On Sunday night, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) dropped a bombshell report. If humanity is to avoid the catastrophic extremes of global warming … then governments around the world need to ramp up their efforts to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, the report concludes.

… the report’s 91 authors outline the path to limiting global warming by 1.5 degrees C above pre-industrial temperatures by 2100 … global greenhouse gases will need to fall by about 45 per cent below 2010 levels within the next 12 years, and then reach “net zero” by 2050, the report says.

This would require “rapid, far-reaching and unprecedented changes in all aspects of society,” … as well as the advent of as yet-unproven means of sucking GHGs out of the atmosphere, the IPCC says.

It’s an astonishing prescription, to be sure — but, here in Canada, many expect the IPCC’s alarm to intensify what is already one of the most divisive political issues of our time: climate change and what to do about it.

To read more CLICK HERE:

This report has nothing to do with sober scientific study of global warning or climate change. It is all about politics and getting a few well-meaning nations to curtail economic growth and sharply reduce their standards of living to accommodate a hoax.

The only thing consistent about the IPCC is that since their initial warnings that the planet was in dire trouble, due to man-made carbon emissions, their voices have become more desperate and strident.

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) in 1988 to assess scientific, technical, and socioeconomic information that is relevant in understanding human-induced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for mitigation and adaptation. 

The IPCC currently is organized into three Working Groups: Working Group I (WGI) addresses observed and projected changes in climate; Working Group II (WGII) addresses vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation related to climate change; and Working Group III (WGIII) addresses options for mitigation of climate change.”

Read that mandate very carefully.

The IPCC is not studying the effects of carbon emissions on global warming. It is focused on man-made carbon emissions only, and ignores all other sources of carbon emissions into the atmosphere … 


.... that would include volcanoes, rotting vegetation in forests and wet lands, forest fires, peat bog fires, melting tundra, burning animal waste for fuel, and rotting garbage.

Worse than that, they are focused on coal, gas, oil and all carbon-based energy fuels.

The IPCC has no ideal of what proportion of total carbon emissions are man-made emissions, but insist that the only solution is to reduce man-made carbon emissions. That is like rushing to an accident victim and spending all resources on stopping bleeding in a cut leg, while ignoring a punctured lung from a chest impact from the same accident.

Part of the IPCC deception is the statement that the report is the work of 91 scientists. Yes that is true, however it is not an entirely accurate statement.

The framework of the report was written by 16 people … Chapter 1 was written by 17 different people … Chapters 2 and 3 were written by another different group of 21 individuals … Chapter 4 was written by another different group of 21 ... and … Chapter 5 was written by yet another group of 16.

None of the authors was involved in the entire report, and only 21 were involved in more than one chapter. 

The Panel meets in Plenary Sessions at the level of government representatives for all member countries.  Currently, the IPCC has 195 members. The Panel meets approximately once a year at the plenary level. These Sessions are attended by hundreds of officials and experts from relevant ministries, agencies and research institutions from member countries and from observer organizations. Currently the IPCC has 152 observer organizations.  Major decisions are taken by the Panel during the Plenary Session.

For example;
1.           the election of the IPCC Chair, IPCC Bureau and the Task Force Bureau;
2.           the structure and mandate of IPCC Working Groups and Task Forces;
3.           IPCC Principles and Procedures;
4.           the work plan of the IPCC;
5.           the budget;
6.           the scope and outline of IPCC reports; and
7.           the approval, adoption and acceptance of reports.

It is not comforting to know that the IPCC is governed by 195 members nations, who are lobbied by 152 attending observer organizations, while less than three dozen nations are making some effort to reduce carbon emissions.

The IPCC is completely politicized and is overrun by non-democratic nations who have no interest in climate change, but have a strong interest in bringing down first world nations.


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

Labels

Show more