Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Todd Stone says, “One and Done” -- No need to fill in Question 2”. Respectfully, he and his fellow BC Liberal MLAs are wrong


From Todd Stone, to Tracy Redies, to John Yapp, to Jane Thornthwaite, to Doug Clovechok, to Mike Bernier, to Lorne Letnick … the list of BC Liberal MLA’s all singing from the same song book goes on and on as their united voices all say, “Vote One and Done". 

Let me say this … they, along with supporters of the BC Liberal Party are WRONG! 

Even IF you do support retaining our current system of  and have no wish to change to some form of Proportional Representation, it IS vitally important for you to vote on Question #2! 

Despite the Liberals trying to persuade us differently, there is indeed plenty of information on the vote, and it is from an independent source – Elections BC.  There you’ll find pretty much everything you need to make an informed choice about the different voting systems, and the different rules for each … including how voters cast their ballot, how votes are counted, and how votes translate into seats in the legislature.

You’ll also find these important words (italics and Bold added by me for emphasis):


  • Whether you prefer First Past the Post, or a proportional system, depends on what’s important to you. No voting system is perfect – otherwise everyone would use the same system!
  •  Every voting system requires trade-offs between competing priorities.
  • Neutral information from Elections BC will help you understand the characteristics of First Past the Post and the proposed proportional systems, but the decision about which system is best, is up to you 
  • get information from all sides in the debate to help make your decision.


The key information I got from that is that no voting system is perfect … and even more importantly… the decision about which system is best for you, is UP TO YOU.

Whether or not I support First Past the Post, what will happen IF a majority of those casting a ballot support changing to one of the three systems of Proportional Representation?


Voting One and Done, as the BC Liberals are recommending, means the possibly of us not having a say on how we vote in the next provincial election.  Instead it becomes a distinct possibility that ONLY those who answer Question #2 will get to make that decision.  Which must mean they are hoping a majority of people vote to retain First Past the Post. 

Let me ask you this, do you want to put all of your eggs in one basket in the hopes that is what happens?  Is that a risk you want to take?  That’s not a chance I am willing to take, and that being the case, I do want to have a say if there is a possibility we may indeed end up with one of the three option of proportional representation. 

Up until recently I had been considering support for the Mixed Member option, although Rural Urban had an appeal to me as well – I may have to reconsider that though. 

What choice may fit best with your values?  Try the survey yourself by CLICKING HERE.  When you do, here’s what you will find before you even begin:

Reasonable efforts have been made to make the questions and results as free from bias as possible, although inevitably some informed judgements had to be made in their preparation.

Elections BC has reviewed related materials, and exempted their presentation and distribution from requirements to report as referendum advertising.

They also give some good advice right up front:

  1. There are no wrong or right answers, just your own personal opinions!
  2. Try not to jump to conclusions about where the survey is headed.
  3. Below each question is an importance scale. Be honest with yourself as to how much you really care about the question you just answered. This helps improve the accuracy of your results, so don't be afraid to say you don't care about some things!


So how did I score after doing the quiz?   

I ended up with Rural / Urban, as my first choice, with a score of 48 out of a possible 90 -- Dual Member was second with a score of 43 -- while Mixed Member was a very distant 18 out of a possible 90.  It seems that my search for information is leading me to perhaps make a better informed choice – and that’s a good thing.

Recently, BC Liberal leader Andrew Wilkinson stated, How we elect MLAs is fundamental to our democracy”. 

While he is absolutely right in what he said, there is something missing from that statement -- thinking for ourselves.  In doing that, I feel fairly certain those reading this will realize why it is important we answer question #2, despite what the BC Liberals are telling is to do.

Here are a few other things important to keep in mind, and these are not my words, they are the words of Election BC:

  • the total number of MLAs in the legislature will be between 87 and 95 (currently there are 87)

  • no region in the province will have fewer MLAs than it does now

  • another referendum will be held after two general elections to see if B.C. wants to keep the new voting system or go back to using First Past the Post


In my own area of the province, Kamloops North Thompson MLA Peter Milobar says … I fully respect people’s right to vote how they want to and keep that private. However, after having so many people asking me how I’m voting in this confusing referendum, I thought I’d share this with you. I’ll be voting one and done.”

Next door in my own riding of Kamloops South Thompson, MLA Todd Stone says … “One and done! No need to fill in Question 2

Respectfully, both they and their fellow BC Liberal MLA’s are wrong – seriously wrong! 

All of this leads me to one final question for you to consider … “Why are the BC Liberals telling us to only answer question #1, and thereby leave the choice of how we vote in the future up to those who answer question 2?”

In Kamloops, I’m Alan Forseth, and I hope you’ll join the discussion on this, or any other topic presented here.  Do you agree … disagree?  Post your thoughts in the Comment Section directly below.

Comments

  1. I see two major issues with the referendum

    1) MLAs are in a conflict of interest and should have been bared from talking about the referendum. This is about how we choose them not what system they want us to choose.

    2) The three alternatives are all bad with one being OK for most of BC but bad for rural BC. I have no idea how they came up with the three on offer but it is like they were looking for bad options.

    I have just spent two days working to understand Dual Member Proportional. My simulations gave me results that are not intuitive and I think would not be acceptable to people in BC.

    For me the core importance of the electoral system is that it takes public will and does a good job of translating that into representation. What I think is of most importance to accomplish this an end to strategic voting and rewarding candidates and parties that do not negatively campaign.

    ReplyDelete
  2. By the way, the quiz you mention has some errors in it. As an example campaign behavior it lists MMP has being less negative than First Past the Post and this is patently untrue. It does the same for DMP but there is no evidence that this is the case.

    It also lists MMP and DMP as being ones in which you would not strategically vote. I do not think DMP would be better than FPTP but I do know that MMP is all about strategic voting, it is core value of the system.

    There are piles of errors in the quiz to favour MMP and go specifically go against FPTP. Whoever designed it is either incompetent or wants to skew people towards MMP. I tried to answer for FPTP and specifically not MMP and the two tied with DMP beating both of them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Total MLA’s will be between 87 and 95. Now isn’t that special we could end up with a system that has 8 more MLA’s, their salaries, their staff salaries, office space etc. Just what we need bigger government!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It depends on which system wins - DMP would retain current number of MLAs, while MMP need the most of up to 8 more... so would it not make sense for you to determine which of these would in fact create no growth in gov't and rank it first choice on your second question? Having said that - maybe a handful of extra representatives is a fair trade off for actually reducing wasted votes, fully representing all regions in our government and making sure all voters felt they can make a difference in an election?

      Delete
  4. I agree Alan. The Liberal party is being disingenuous about pro rep. They are using the future lower mainland vs rural bc hype, while currently, there is not a sitting government member in the vast majority of rural bc, under the current system. They also Don't elect their own leader under fptp. Go figure.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Stupid idea to leave the second question blank, but selfishly, I like it because that makes my vote more powerful. Instead of my voting counting as 1 in 1 million, if half decide not to answer, my vote is now worth 1 in 500,000. Cool beans.

    Oh, and I'm of the opinion that the 3rd option is the best of the lot (not that I like any of them in particular) because it does have some STV in it, albeit just for more urban areas.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: As a BC Conservative member, and campaign worker, I will again state that the fact these errors were found -- AND brought to light BY Elections BC -- shows the system IS working

Sadly, two and a half weeks after the BC provincial election campaign, those who want to undermine our political process are still at.  PLUS, we also have one who doesn’t even live in our country, never mind our province. I speak of the buffoon running for President of the United States, who has poisoned the well when it comes to faith in the electoral process. Just today alone, comments such as the following, were being made of posts that I shared online: ... all the votes they keep finding has just favoured NDP on in all critical ridings and soon they will flip another riding in favour of NDP, Come on. ... Elections BC has ridiculed British Columbians, and I no longer have confidence or trust in their process and competence regarding the results Then there are others online, with comments like these – who are claiming fraud in the October 19th election: ... Who is the oversight for Elections BC? They should be investigated for election fraud! ... Fraudulent election ... should be red

“With the talent and dedication of this caucus we will hold David Eby to account for his government’s out of control spending and ongoing failures in healthcare, public safety and addictions" — John Rustad

Today, John Rustad, Leader of the Conservative Party of British Columbia, proudly unveiled his shadow cabinet, a dynamic team of talented individuals ready to hold David Eby’s disastrous government accountable and present a strong alternative vision for British Columbia. “ Our shadow cabinet is a diverse and experienced group, committed to restoring prosperity, public safety, and affordability for every British Columbian ,” said Rustad. “ With experts in every field, we are focused on delivering real solutions for the challenges our province faces .” Rustad emphasized the historic appointment of Aaliya Warbus as House Leader. The shadow cabinet reflects the Conservative Party’s vision to build a brighter future for British Columbia. The appointments are as follows: Leadership Positions : Aaliya Warbus – House Leader Bruce Banman – Whip Sheldon Claire – Deputy Whip Portfolios : Tony Luck – Municipal Affairs and Local Government Sharon Hartwell – Rural Communities and Rural Development I

Labels

Show more