Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

How Can Governments Thirst for Increased Tax Revenues be Squared With It's So-Called Concern for Those Suffering From Addictions

Why does the provincial government want to make it easier for alcohol to be accessible?  Well I don't wish to be cynical, however here are a few things you may wish to understand and be aware of.  Let's start with this ...

According to the Provincial Sales Tax Act, businesses are obligated by law to charge 10% Provincial Sales Tax (PST) on sales of liquor with an alcohol content higher than 1% (beer, ciders and coolers, mixed drinks, spirits and liqueurs, and wine).  As well, they also are required to charge 10% PST on chill charges, or other extra charges, included in the selling price of liquor.

That makes the sale, and consumption, of alcoholic beverages a huge revenue generator to BC's provincial government ... in fact to the tune of hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars.  And any loss of those revenues would be viewed with (I believe) a great deal of alarm.

So I ask you then, "Is it possible that the loosening of regulations regarding alcohol by impacted in any way by revenue / tax losses?"  You tell me.

Look no further than Business in Vancouver,for a possible answer.  "... British Columbia had the biggest drop in profit from alcohol sales among Canadian provinces in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 ... generated almost $877 million in profit from alcohol sales in the 2013 /2014 fiscal year compared with $929.6 million a year earlier (2012 / 2013), according to the nation’s number cruncher."

The BC Liberal government however, was able to rebound just a year later, according to Statistics Canada, as you can see from Stats-Can figures ... when combined with those from the Business in BC article.

Net Income
2012 - 13

Net Income
2013 - 2014
Net Income
2014 - 2015

British Columbia




Of course during this same period, we've had ever increasing slackening of where, when, and how alcohol can be sold and consumed --- including at more and more family based events. 

That's why it should have been no surprise that a BC Liberal media release, on November 16th, 2016, announced:

" ...
policy changes from the Province will allow all types of B.C. businesses to apply for a liquor licence, opening up possibilities for new revenue streams and diversified business services ... businesses like barber shops, salons, spas, cooking schools, art galleries and book stores will be able to apply for a liquor licence to diversify their business model and serve liquor to customers ... so long as they do not operate from a motor vehicle or target minors ... "

Our provincial governments have always been quick to hit us with more and more taxes ... and hidden fees.  Posts I made recently discussed how revenue to the provincial government has increased greatly from gambling sources (as has the misery from those caught up in it's addictions)

Now, with government revenue increasing from added liquor sales and consumption, the government must really be feeling the need to soothe it's own conscience, or at least try and make itself look good. 

On Friday January 13th they announced "Take it slow – less is more with moderation"

The government media release stated, " ... through a new social responsibility campaign, the Province is promoting moderation and encouraging responsible alcohol consumption ... education, awareness, and timely information (will be) important tools that help encourage British Columbians to make smart, healthy choices. The new advertising campaign emphasizes moderation when drinking ... "

Coralee Oakes (Minister of Small Business and Red Tape Reduction and Minister Responsible for the Liquor Distribution Branch) seemed proud to state that,
Protecting the health and safety of British Columbians is one of the top priorities of our government. Through this new campaign focused on moderation, we are taking an active role in educating and informing British Columbians about the risks related to alcohol.”

Meantime John Yap (Parliamentary Secretary for Liquor Policy Review" was quoted saying that Increasing public education about the harmful effects of alcohol abuse is a key part of modernizing B.C.’s liquor laws."

I for one question how governments thirst for more and more tax revenue, from every conceivable stream, can be squared with it's so-called concern for those suffering from addictions ... including gambling and alcohol ... and the related misery it creates for family members of those afflicted?  That along with related accidents and illnesses, mental health issues, social and family problems created along the way ... and costs for our court system and jails.

I ask this especially in the wake of the paltry $58,000 being spent for design, printing, and distribution of materials for this new social responsibility campaign, announced on Friday.  

$58 thousand vs. hundreds of MILLIONS in government revenues.  SHAME on Christy Clark ... shame on the BC Liberals!

Sadly, on May 9th, it won't matter if we have a change of government or not.  Neither the NDP or the BC Liberals know how to live within their means, and the despair and misery that comes from that, will continue until such time as WE decide to hold government accountable for its actions.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more