Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

WHAT WILL HAPPEN if those revenue declines are even more severe?

Happy (?) New Year ... and from the "Just in case you missed it" files, news of what you'll be paying more for ...

As of January 1st Medical Services Plan (MSP) premiums increased by about 4 per cent, thanks to our BC Liberal government.  ON TOP OF THAT, MSP premium rates, paid by over half million couples, will increase by an additional $14 per month (on top of the above noted 4 per cent increase).

BUT THERE'S MORE ... Property Tax revenue is expected to grow by an average of 4.3 per cent during the next three years.

And of course there's the three we were already well aware of:
ICBC ... an average increase of 5%
Fortis ... increases by 2.76%
BC Hydro ... increases by 3.5%

The Carbon Tax was expected to increase annually by an average of 1.6 per cent per year, over the next three years.  Facing an election, and the heat the Federal Liberals were taking over the Carbon Tax, Christy Clarks BC Liberals decided against the increase. 

We should all be aware however that the Carbon Tax adds 6.7 cents for every litre of fuel to drive our vehicles ... and for something essential, like heating our homes, we get to pay $1.49 per gigajoule for natural gas. 

Those of course are costs we can actually see on our bills. 

We do however pay more for EVERYTHING necessary to live (food, clothing, appliances, footwear, outerwear, sporting goods etc etc) because all of those things require transportation, which requires fuel, which costs more, and whose added costs get passed on to us.

The BC Liberal government also acknowledges, in the 2016 / 17 Budget and Fiscal Plan, that personal income tax base revenue (excluding tax measures and accounting adjustments for prior years) is forecast to average 4.5 per cent annual growth over the next three years. And as if they weren't already taking enough from you, Provincial Sales Tax revenue growth is expected to average 4.3 per cent annually over the next three years.

Headed into an election in just four more months, the one thing you WON'T hear the government discussing is our Provincial Debt. 

During the current fiscal year, provincial debt will increase from $65.3 billion to $67.7 billion ... an increase of 2.4 BILLION!!!   And total provincial debt is projected to be $71.9 billion by 2018 /19.

Looking at the provincial governments own Budget and Fiscal Plan 2016 / 2017 is not for the faint of heart.  There are a number of things that could have a severe impact resulting in debt increasing by an even greater amount. 

So what does our BC government say could be major risks to their fiscal plan? Here's just two of them:

  1. impacts of the expiration of the 2006 Softwood Lumber Agreement between Canada and the United States.  And guess what, it's expired, and USA lumber producers are not happy about Canada's share of lumber used there. Our province (BC) has the largest number of lumber producing companies in Canada, making us the biggest target of countervailing duties that WILL BE imposed on us. 

    Anyone seeking the results of the last go-round with the US will find that ... "In the previous softwood dispute, the U.S. imposed duties totaling 27 per cent. It took five years of litigation by Canada at a cost of more than $100 million to have the duty reduced to zero. By that time, the U.S. had collected US$5.4 billion in duties. Only US$4.4 billion was returned"

    What does that mean for British Columbians?  In all likelihood it will result in reduced lumber production, job losses not just in the sawmills, but also losses for those in logging and trucking, and decreased revenues to the BC government

  2. the outcome of litigation, arbitrations, and negotiations with third parties, including the appeal of the Supreme Court of Canada decision on the teachers’ contract issue.  Well we already know how that's gone ... the BC government lost, and the first round of expenses are already being added up.  In mid-November last year, the Vancouver Sun suggested the government will likely have to hire hundreds of teachers and spend between $250 million and $300 million more each year on education

The 2016 / 17 Budget and Fiscal Plan has already acknowledged additional risks to the provinces finances because ...

... Natural gas royalties are expected to decline 15.2 per cent in 2016/17

... revenue from mineral tax, fees and miscellaneous mining receipts is expected to decrease 26.1 per cent in 2016/17

... Forests revenue is forecast to decline 2.5 per cent in 2016/17

WHAT WILL HAPPEN if those revenue declines are even more severe? 

Really, it's no wonder that the middle class taxpayer is being gouged more and more, due to the fiscal incompetence of the BC Liberal government.  The only thing scarier though is what would happen, to the BC economy, if the NDP took over the reins of power in May's general election.

I want to see a positive future for BC ... but it's honestly getting harder and harder.

In Kamloops, I'm Alan Forseth.


Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg


Show more