ADAM OLSEN -- Rather than a healthy, vigorous (but healthy) exchange of ideas and solutions, it’s an all-out war of words in a last-ditch effort to win a majority government on election day
As the summer BBQ tour continues and the federal election candidates
make the best of the long, hot days on the hustings, the campaign will heat up
as September draws closer.
“Crazy season” starts when the partisan faithful try every angle to get
the edge on their competition. It’s when democratic debate turns into a
bare-knuckle prize fight. Perhaps it’s the most visible symptom of the sickness
in our democracy.
Rather than a healthy, vigorous (but healthy) exchange of
ideas and solutions, it’s an all-out war of words in a last-ditch effort to win
a majority government on election day.
I’ve been through a couple campaigns now and it’s a personal test.
Social media platforms are both super useful engagement tools and supercharged
outrage machines that can overwhelm a candidate and campaign team. The bigger
the perceived threat by the competition, the larger the target and the more
vicious the attacks.
It’s not the best time in our communities. While we should be focusing
on the ideas and solutions, the passion and desperation in a campaign can
easily become personal.
The stakes are high because power distribution only happens once every
four years. Pressure on the party leaders, backroom
strategists, pollsters and number-crunchers, campaign managers and
candidates is intense. Each and every campaign team is staffed with volunteers
who are heavily invested in achieving a specific outcome in an ever-decreasing
amount of time. The clock is always ticking.
Changing the culture of crazy season
With all of these factors on the field of play, how do we change the
nature of the game? How do we continue to inspire and engage as many people in
the debate as we can while keeping the focus on ideas and solutions?
It starts with a hopeful message, founded on a clear vision of the
future we are working toward and an achievable plan to accomplish it.
We have to design an inclusive culture in our campaign teams modeled by
the leader and candidates, nurtured by the team leads on the ground in each
riding. The priority outcome should be a thoughtful government that looks after
the entire spectrum of social, environmental and economic responsibilities of
the community, province or country, whatever the case may be.
Finally, our tone is crucial. We need to be able to challenge and
critique the proposed ideas and solutions of our competition in a respectful
way. How do we do this when time is running out and the pressure is increasing?
We need to stay out of the political ditch and in our own lane, demonstrate the
value we add to the discussion and commit to changing the culture of
campaigning and governing.
Yes, it’s easier to say these words than do it. However, the future of
our community, province, country and planet is at stake so it’s worth the
effort!
Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly
of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands. Born in Victoria, BC in
1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich
Peninsula. He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily,
are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.
Comments
Post a Comment