JOHN FELDSTED -- Either the US Justice Department has sufficient evidence to justify extradition in which case a hearing should be held forthwith, or it lacks evidence which should result in her immediate release
Canada’s deteriorating relationship with China takes its toll on
farmers, ranchers
Carrie Tait ~~ Globe and Mail ~~ June 30, 2019
Graham Friesen is sitting in a comfy leather office chair in the front
row of a cattle auction in rural Alberta, bidding on bulls and heifers with
subtle head nods and fist shakes. He’s a cattle broker, making him a regular
fixture at sales like this one last week in Strathmore, Alta., where about 30
others have gathered for the auction or to just gossip over pancakes and coffee
in the lobby.
China banned Canadian beef and pork imports two days prior, injecting
confusion, frustration and anger into conversations with those in the livestock industry who say that they are, once again,
coming under unjust pressure because of frayed diplomatic relationships around
the globe.
“World politics is dirty,” Mr. Friesen says as cattle plod through the
sale ring. “We’re losing at that game.”
There
is something off about the arrest and detention of Meng Wanzhou – it does not pass
a smell test.
Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou |
Under
our legal system, prosecutors need to have a case before they issue an arrest
warrant. If a prosecutor does not have a case he can take to court, he or she
can interview a suspect, but generally cannot keep him under arrest for more
than a few hours.
Meng
Wanzhou was arrested on December 1, 2018. She has been granted bail with stiff
conditions including giving up her passport and paying for 24-hour monitoring,
but essentially, she is under house arrest. The fundamental principles of justice do not appear to have been met.
The
accused is entitled to know what the charges are and what evidence is held
against her. There should not be unreasonable delays. Seven months have passed,
and an extradition hearing is scheduled for January
2020. That is 13 months after the arrest.
Either
the US Justice Department has sufficient evidence to justify extradition in
which case a hearing should be held forthwith, or it lacks evidence which
should result in her immediate release.
Our government should not be pleading with the US to intervene on our
behalf with China. We should insist that the US government either extradite Meng Wanzhou within 30 days or
we will release her.
The United
States has had over half a year to prepare its case – it is put up or shut up
time. We are not helpless; just clueless.
The
media silence following the G-20 summit in Japan reflects Canada’s loss of
stature. We are ignored or ridiculed rather than respected. Government
ineptness has come home to roost and the Meng Wanzhou affair is part of it.
Announcing
piously that we are only following the rule of law is ridiculous when the SNC-Lavalin affair is hovering in the background, two
senior cabinet ministers have been tossed from the Liberal
Caucus, Clerk of the Privy Council and the Prime Minister’s Principle
Secretary have resigned and a very serious charge against Mark Norman was
suddenly dropped.
G-20
leaders are aware of what is going on in Canada and are not impressed ... nor are
Canadians.
John
Feldsted
Political
Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg,
Manitoba
Comments
Post a Comment