Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

Resource Works -- LNG offers massive advantages for the evolving global energy mix



If you have to burn a fossil fuel for power or heat, natural gas should be the first choice. Energy specialist Ian King makes the case for liquefied natural gas from British Columbia.

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: natural gas is a worse climate villain than coal. It’s a bridge fuel to nowhere. British Columbia should stop trying to become a supplier of liquefied natural gas to the rest of the world.

It’s a familiar refrain, usually heard coming from green activists and the think tanks that support them. They’ll pump out occasional flurries of commentaries, flush with rhetoric and carefully picked factoids.

At first glance, the arguments seem compelling — until you take a second look. Even from a distance, the arguments against LNG don’t hold up. If you haven’t the time to go deep, simply consider the fuels’ lifecycle emissions.

University of Calgary professor Adebola Kasulu and colleagues analyzed Canadian LNG using a variety of studies of natural gas emissions over its whole life cycle. They included emissions from drilling, production, shipping, to burner tip. In every case, LNG had a lower CO2 equivalent impact than coal.

Even using the most pessimistic models, including one from a very harsh critic of natural gas, LNG had at least 25% fewer emissions. Most scenarios had much better results.

So what goes into British Columbia's LNG’s advantage?

BC‘s initial LNG exports will be shipped from LNG Canada in Kitimat. Like all the world’s large LNG plants, it’ll use gas turbine power — but with major emissions advantages over its international peers.

Industrial turbines thermal efficiency has increased close to 40% over the last few decades. LNG Canada can take full advantage of those improvements. Chilling natural gas takes less energy in cool, cloudy Kitimat than in Western Australia or Texas. By some estimates, Kitimat’s climate advantage means one third less energy is needed to get gas to -162 degrees Celsius on the North Coast than it would in Australia.

Taken together with incremental improvements in process efficiency, LNG Canada has the foundation to achieve its goal of being the world’s least CO2-intense large-scale LNG plant.

Howe Sound’s Woodfibre LNG will rely on electric drive rather than burning its own gas. BC’s nearly zero-emission hydropower ensures it’ll outclass almost any LNG export plant you can name. It may not be as large as LNG Canada, but its contribution is still valuable.

In the Peace River country, emissions reduction and electrification is happening in the gas fields that will supply the feed for LNG. New processing plants, where impurities are removed and heavier hydrocarbons are extracted from the raw gas, are choosing electric power over gas. BC‘s carbon tax has played a part in shifting the sector to electrify, as has a build-out of electrical infrastructure in the Peace.

While critics have raised concerns over fugitive methane emissions, BC has responded with tighter regulations. New wells and plants will be built to tougher standards, inspected three times a year for leaks.

Some producers are already going beyond the government’s goals. Shell, the lead partner in LNG Canada, estimates its methane leakage is 0.1%. Their new wells in the Groundbirth area west of Dawson Creek have replaced gas-emitting pneumatic controls with electric ones. Other players are taking similar approaches to keep that methane where it belongs: in the sales pipeline.

Some of BC‘s LNG foes, notable the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, have taken to portraying coal in a relatively positive light in their attempts to demonize gas. It’s a monumentally silly pose.

In their world, coal can be mined, shipped easily, with scant fugitive emissions, and little fuel needed to get the stuff from mine to power plant.

Not so fast.

To deliver the same energy as a ton of LNG takes 2.5 tons of Powder River Basin coal. That’s two and a half times the mass to move from the Rockies to the Coast, and then across the Pacific – no formula for saving fuel.

Coal is worse than LNG in other ways. Aside from CO2, coal has far more sulphur, mercury, and particulate emissions than gas — even with smokestack scrubbers and filters.

From BC‘s perspective, gas has a giant advantage. We produce it, and we benefit from royalties and income taxes from the sector. Our government can make sure our producers live up to their claims of being as clean as they say they are. None of that happens with Wyoming coal.
 
Liquefied natural gas is no cure-all for the climate challenge humanity faces. No one part of the evolving energy mix is. Gas offers a ready substitute for coal in regions that have few choices in keeping their grids up.

If you have to burn a fossil fuel for power or heat, natural gas should be the first choice.


Ian King is an instrumentation and control specialist whose work takes him all over northeastern British Columbia and northwestern Alberta. Originally from Vancouver, he now lives in Taylor, BC, at Mile 36 of the Alaska Highway. The view from his "office" is always changing, and that's just how he likes it. Follow him on Twitter at @IanKing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more