Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED -- Taxpayer funds to buy votes in major metropolitan centres -- meddling in provincial affairs


CBC NEWS: Ottawa to invest $1.3 billion in Blue line extension -- the investment corresponds to about a third of the expected total cost



It is hard to know where to begin with what is wrong with this announcement. For starters, it is just in time for the fall federal election.

Local infrastructure is a provincial jurisdiction. The federal government has no constitutional authority to spend money on local infrastructure unless:

  • The subway connects Quebec with another province or port; or
  • The subway is of benefit to two or more provinces; or
  • The subway can be declared of benefit to Canada as a whole.

Secondly, we have to look at populations and shares of cost. When sort through that:
  • The City of Montreal is putting up about $1.995 billion
  • Quebecers living outside of Montreal are putting up about $1.497 billion; and
  • Canadian living outside of Quebec are putting up about $1 billion.     

As a Manitoba resident I have a problem with subsidizing a subway in Montreal.

Budget 2016 committed $14.4 billion focused on accelerating federal investments in the short term by providing funding for the rehabilitation, repair, and modernization of existing public transit, green and social infrastructure. Additional funding was targeted towards post-secondary education and broadband access for remote communities.

Budget 2017 made an additional $81.2 billion of funding available across five priority infrastructure streams: public transit, green, social, trade and transportation, and rural and northern communities' infrastructure.

Our federal government has created two programs. The Smart Cities Challenge and the Canada Infrastructure Bank to manage about $96 billion in funding. It is apparent that the federal government wants to control which major infrastructure projects will be funded in cities and municipalities although this is a clearly a provincial jurisdiction.

To see how our funds are being spent, visit the Infrastructure Canada funding site.

$42.3 billion in funding covering 48,195 projects has been approved. That is a bit over 12% of our projected annual budget of $330 billion and we know very little about exactly where the funds have been spent. That is just over half of the funds currently allocated.      

Samuel de Champlain Bridge
$42.3 billion is a little more than double our annual federal deficits.

The spending is unconstitutional meddling in provincial jurisdictions that allows the federal government to make announcements and appear to be working for us.  We begin to understand how insidious and destructive this regime is.

It is unsurprising that two examples of Infrastructure Canada’s investments are in the $4 billion Samuel de Champlain Bridge connecting Montreal with her south shore commuter communities and now the $4.5 billion Montreal subway extension.

The federal government is unlawfully using taxpayer funds to buy votes in major metropolitan centres.

Federal preoccupation with meddling in provincial affairs to appear to be leading the nation instead of paying attention to its responsibilities has to end.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

BC child killer's name change prompts criticism, political finger-pointing (Times Colonist)

The fact that child killer Allan Schoenborn has successfully changed his name under BC laws has prompted finger-pointing among politicians. BC Premier David Eby told media Thursday that in 2002 when opposition leader Kevin Falcon was the Minister of Deregulation he removed regulations under the Name Act that ensured name changes would be published publicly in the BC Gazette ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more