Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

JOHN FELDSTED -- Taxpayer funds to buy votes in major metropolitan centres -- meddling in provincial affairs


CBC NEWS: Ottawa to invest $1.3 billion in Blue line extension -- the investment corresponds to about a third of the expected total cost



It is hard to know where to begin with what is wrong with this announcement. For starters, it is just in time for the fall federal election.

Local infrastructure is a provincial jurisdiction. The federal government has no constitutional authority to spend money on local infrastructure unless:

  • The subway connects Quebec with another province or port; or
  • The subway is of benefit to two or more provinces; or
  • The subway can be declared of benefit to Canada as a whole.

Secondly, we have to look at populations and shares of cost. When sort through that:
  • The City of Montreal is putting up about $1.995 billion
  • Quebecers living outside of Montreal are putting up about $1.497 billion; and
  • Canadian living outside of Quebec are putting up about $1 billion.     

As a Manitoba resident I have a problem with subsidizing a subway in Montreal.

Budget 2016 committed $14.4 billion focused on accelerating federal investments in the short term by providing funding for the rehabilitation, repair, and modernization of existing public transit, green and social infrastructure. Additional funding was targeted towards post-secondary education and broadband access for remote communities.

Budget 2017 made an additional $81.2 billion of funding available across five priority infrastructure streams: public transit, green, social, trade and transportation, and rural and northern communities' infrastructure.

Our federal government has created two programs. The Smart Cities Challenge and the Canada Infrastructure Bank to manage about $96 billion in funding. It is apparent that the federal government wants to control which major infrastructure projects will be funded in cities and municipalities although this is a clearly a provincial jurisdiction.

To see how our funds are being spent, visit the Infrastructure Canada funding site.

$42.3 billion in funding covering 48,195 projects has been approved. That is a bit over 12% of our projected annual budget of $330 billion and we know very little about exactly where the funds have been spent. That is just over half of the funds currently allocated.      

Samuel de Champlain Bridge
$42.3 billion is a little more than double our annual federal deficits.

The spending is unconstitutional meddling in provincial jurisdictions that allows the federal government to make announcements and appear to be working for us.  We begin to understand how insidious and destructive this regime is.

It is unsurprising that two examples of Infrastructure Canada’s investments are in the $4 billion Samuel de Champlain Bridge connecting Montreal with her south shore commuter communities and now the $4.5 billion Montreal subway extension.

The federal government is unlawfully using taxpayer funds to buy votes in major metropolitan centres.

Federal preoccupation with meddling in provincial affairs to appear to be leading the nation instead of paying attention to its responsibilities has to end.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

GORDON F. D. WILSON: When The Trick Masquerades as The Treat

Thirty-seven years ago, Halloween 1987, I became the leader of the BC Liberal Party.   British Columbia was badly polarized. Social Credit held one side and the NDP the other. It had been twelve years, 1975, since Liberal MLAs Garde Gardom, Pat McGeer, and Alan Williams had walked away from their party to join Social Credit, one year after the lone Progressive Conservative MLA Hugh Curtis had abandoned his party to sit with Bill Bennett, the son and heir apparent to long-serving BC Premier, WAC Bennett.   An unwritten agreement by the biggest Canadian political shareholders, the federal Liberals and Conservatives, decided that if British Columbia was to remain a lucrative franchise from a revenue perspective, they couldn’t risk splitting the electoral vote and electing the real enemy, the NDP, so no resources would be used to finance either a Liberal or Conservative party provincially.   “There are two sides to every street,” I was told by a very prominent Canadian businessman who cont

FORSETH: You Have To Be A Bit Crazy

  Ward and his wife Carleen celebrating his win on election night.   In March of this year, I took on the role of Campaign Manager for BC Conservative candidate Ward Stamer.  It’s the third time I’ve had the opportunity as I took on the role for Peter Sharp in 2013, and for Dennis Giesbrecht in 2020. Now let me tell you, in the past, a BC Conservative campaign team generally consisted of myself, the candidate and one or two helpers – and very little in the way of a campaign budget. Thankfully, a benefit of having spent 30+ years in the broadcast media afforded me the ability to do ad copy and write candidate speeches, and prep both Dennis and Peter to deal with the media – it’s also something I have always enjoyed. That was part of my duties this time around as well, however having a team of a dozen and a half volunteers meant that for the first time we had people available to ID our supporters, put together and install campaign signs, distribute campaign literature, and help out at ou

Rustad will support policy for 'everyday' people, otherwise work to bring down NDP

  Conservative Party of B.C. John Rustad Tuesday (Oct. 29) said his party would support government policies that support "average, everyday working" persons in B.C., but also repeated earlier promises to bring down the B.C. NDP government under Premier David Eby. "If there are things that are moved forward that will improve lives for those people, we would be looking at support it," Rustad said. "But if he's going to carry forward with the destructive policies that he has, then yes, we are going to look at every opportunity possible to bring him down as soon as possible."  CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more