The fragility
of a 'big tent' conservative party (There is a long history of right-wing parties
splintering and merging in Canada)
CBC News ~~ Duane Bratt & Bruce Foster ~~ July 25th
This is a well-researched article, and well-reasoned around the various versions of Conservative and other right-side party mergers, coalitions and shotgun marriages to fight a common partisan political enemy. Or two.
But what does that mean for the current
paradigm in the looming Canadian federal election?
It would seem that the Andrew Scheer-led
Conservative Party of Canada has been doing quite well at forming local
coalitions against left-side incumbents (judging from their candidate
nominations), and Scheer and his advisers also have been doing well to position
themselves as electable such as by producing a passable policy on climate
change (even though the supposed climate crisis is bogus, the preponderance of
people believing it's real must be assuaged).
They have been assembling a fairly
wide-ranging platform that so far has avoided angering large swaths of voters
as well as not giving the Liberal backroomers some easy targets for policy
barbs (such as on say abortion or gay rights).
On the other hand, the election is still about 90 days away so we can
expect the Liberals will be launching lots of pointed barbs at Scheer and the
Tories closer to voting day.
And that's where coalition-building becomes so important:
for the Scheer Conservatives to win they will need a team, and a platform,
strong enough to hold together when the caboose goes around a corner at high
speed.
Can the Scheer team build a platform with
enough appealing planks in it to keep most supporters aboard even when the
going gets rocky? And the Liberal strategists surely will be rattling every
cage, pounding every door and flooding their already-captive mainstream media
with propaganda designed to derail Scheer's shaky coalition.
It remains to be seen how the campaigning
will play out, and the war of issues managers takes place, perhaps spiced up by
Warren Kinsella shooting barbs for the federal Green Party.
And what will happen in vote-rich Quebec?
Scheer's French is reasonably fluent,
especially for a guy from Regina, but will he also have a strong enough Quebec
lieutenant to attract some extra votes from Quebec's notoriously self-serving
voters?
Will the Jagmeet Singh New Democrats be a
force?
Likely not, which means some usual left-side
voters will be migrating to the Trudeau Liberals, making Scheer's climb even
steeper - unless he suddenly rediscovers his party's Red Tory roots and adds a
few planks to try to pull in a few migrant votes from the centre-left (pun
intended insofar as illegal border-crossing may be a mixed issue for several
parties).
Maxime Bernier, leader of the People Party of Canada |
And then there is Maxime Bernier's fledgling
Peoples Party of Canada, which may prove to be merely a puny vanity project, or
it could step up a notch and become a crucial vote-splitter in a dozen or so
swing ridings.
The gist of the article (The fragility of
a ‘big tent’ conservative party) is that Canada has had a long history of
Conservative and right-side movements splintering at the starting gate, and
rarely running together, and in 2019 we seem to be seeing a re-run of that.
It hearkens back to the formation of the
Reform Party of Canada, which brought together populist western alienation
forces (which included quite a few progressive activists) but inevitably became
dominated by the blue-Tory social-conservative clique of and around Preston
Manning which never did form a bond with a national mentality from all regions.
Should Scheer go after Bernier or pretend he
doesn't exist?
Good question. We'll soon see.
If Scheer can paint the Justin Trudeau
Liberals as a disastrous incompetent cabal needing to be urgently evicted, then
yes he could form a majority, especially with the left-side movements so
splintered. But if the right-side
splinters too then we could get a dysfunctional minority like those pizza
parliaments seen often or late in Europe, which is a slippery slope to bad
government.
What should Scheer do?
Strategize very carefully about what is
needed to build a big strong tent well able to withstand the political winds
sure to come, and big enough to welcome in a wide range of differing views.
What issues should his platform feature?
That's a topic for another day but meanwhile he'd be wise to ask his pollsters
this question:
“What mix of which issues do I need to
pull in about 40% of the popular vote in about two-thirds of Canada's
constituencies?”
Should I be wet or dry on the climate? Should
we tax the rich a bit more, or ease back on balancing the budget in the short
term? And which ridings should I focus on to win at least half of the seats?
(recalling Donald Trump's focus on electoral college votes).
Ah yes, Canadian politics - a blood sport
lots of folks enjoy watching, but also this: how many people will turn out to
vote and why or why not?
As always, pulling out the supporters to vote
on E-Day (and in advance polls) can make a critical difference.
1. Your position on climate change essentially amounts to this. A vast conspiracy comprised of 97% of the world's climate scientists seek to implement a massive hoax only to be thwarted by a plucky band of billionaires and oil companies. I do agree with you that Scheer is only paying climate change lip service and offers nothing of consequence.
ReplyDelete2. Andrew Scheer was born and raised in bi-lingual Ottawa. He is not from Regina.
3. Tell me more about Mr. Scheer's long and storied experience in the private sector. I've heard a nasty rumour that it is comprised solely of a six month stint selling insurance. That isn't true is it?
Not replying on behalf of John, however I would like to point out that the "97% of scientists agree" on global warming has been much debated since 2013 ... including this from the Washington Post: 97 percent of scientific papers (that take a stance on the issue) agree, the study finds. Among the general population I do not believe there is much debate there isn't global warming, but simply there is much discussion on to what degree it is happening, as well as how and why.
Delete