|Sandy MacDougall ... |
AKA the Sidewinder
In general terms, being politically conservative means exercising caution when considering change, following traditional ways, and having a practical and ethical social conscience. Being socially conservative means following much the same philosophy in terms of environment and lifestyle.
In my view, a conservative approach to social issues must be inclusive and reflect a strong social conscience.
It has always annoyed me that the NDP and its predecessor, the CCF, portray themselves as the only political party with social conscience, something that is remarkably inaccurate and misleading.
It is in the nature of being conservative that we must consider the well being of everyone living on this planet.
Now that I have stated my definition of what I consider being a conservative means, I will offer a few examples of those things or people that do not meet my personal definition of conservative standards ethically, socially or politically.
candidate Kevin O'Leary
O'Leary, much like Donald Trump in the United States, wants immediate change and couldn't care less who or what gets hurt in the process. O'Leary's background in reality television reveals much of what we might expect from him in politics. In Canada, O'Leary is one of the inhabitants of the Dragon's Den. In the United States, he can be found in the Shark Tank.
Doesn't that tell you all you need to know in order to bypass him in his leadership bid? O'Leary is not conservative. His attitude is totalitarian in nature, something that should find no safe haven in any democracy, conservative or otherwise.
Being conservative shouldn't include bullying and denigrating refugees and imposing regulations, other than criminal code provisions, on any person or group of people which make it difficult or impossible for them to retain and practice their own culture or religion. And yet, at least one of the Conservative leadership hopefuls espouses a platform that smacks of racism and intolerance.
candidate Kellie Leitch
Again, this is not conservative by any reasonable definition.
In a 1912 speech Laurier had suggested that it was wrong to discriminate against immigrants based on race or religion but only if they became assimilated into Canadian culture.
Carefully considering change doesn't mean waving flags, stomping our feet or performing other symbolic protest measures in opposition to immigration or any socially acceptable progressive developments such as constitutional change.
That sort of action, such as Ontario and Quebec's resistance to constitutional or senate reform isn't conservative; it's selfish and self-serving.
In my opinion, a truly conservative approach to change simply means making sure the change is going to enhance life in our democracy for everyone and is not based on purely partisan views.
The good old boys school of backroom politics, favourtism and cronyism has plagued most major Canadian political parties nationally and provincially for decades.
Once again, this is something that is definitely not conservative in nature because it too frequently operates without conscience or respect. It is all about power and influence with seldom enough consideration for those values which make Canada a beacon for freedom and democracy throughout the world.
The Conservative Party of Canada leadership vote will be held May 27.