Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED - Whether the handgun is used to commit crimes, aggression against a rival, or in defence of another gang or drug dealer, innocent bystanders are in jeopardy

Toronto Chief of Police Mark Saunders
Our approach to people who possess illegal handguns or who have and use guns in the commission of a crime needs a serious overhaul.

The spate of shootings in Toronto was caused by people. They were settling scores or in disputes over criminal territory. Toronto Chief of Police Mark Saunders and Mayor John Tory are on the right track. Section 88 of the Criminal Code states:

Possession of weapon for dangerous purpose
Section 88
(1) Every person commits an offence who carries or possesses a weapon, an imitation of a weapon, a prohibited device or any ammunition or prohibited ammunition for a purpose dangerous to the public peace or for the purpose of committing an offence.

Punishment
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1)
(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years; or
(b) is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
    
We need amendments to the criminal code to repeal Section 88 (2) (b) and to make the sentence for a breach of Section 88 consecutive to any sentence for other crimes committed where a weapon was carried or possessed. Someone committing murder, manslaughter or attempted murder should have a Section 88 violation considered in determining eligibility for parole.

Why is it hard to understand that criminals do not follow laws?

Bail conditions are meaningless.

Gang members on bail will return to their gangs and criminal activities.

“Gun violence” is a misnomer and distraction. Violent, often criminal people use handguns without regard for innocent people in the area. People caught with illegal guns, in particular handguns, need to sit in remand until their case can be heard in court. We need to focus on the people endangering our society not on guns.

Banning handguns will not stop the flow of illegal firearms because criminal gangs make enough money to afford to acquire illegal weapons. We have to get career criminal off the streets by any means at our disposal.
  
Sitting in remand awaiting trial and long sentences on conviction make carrying and using handguns far less attractive.

Anyone carrying an illegal handgun is a danger public safety. Whether the handgun is used to commit crimes, aggression against a rival, or in defence against members of another gang or drug dealer, innocent bystanders are in jeopardy. No one carries a handgun without an intent to harm.

Every city and town across the nation is suffering from the same perils, and, rural areas are not exempt.

Violent use of weapons is not confined to Toronto. Until we wake up and smell the coffee, shootings will continue.
 
John Feldsted
Political commentator, Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more