Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RESOURCE WORKS -- Once this crisis is over, our federal and provincial governments will be faced with difficult decisions about spending and stimulus


Stewart Muir and Margareta Dovgal look at emerging ideas for a strong recovery from the pandemic ...



recent paper from David Williams of the Business Council of British Columbia points to Canada's nagging inability to improve living standards for its residents.

Comments Williams: "Once the COVID-19 crisis has passed, it will be important for policymakers to start addressing the inefficiencies and disincentives in Canada’s economy that have been holding back productivity growth and the spirit of innovation."

He points to five long-term priorities that will allow for a stronger economy in the recovery phase:

  1. Modernizing the tax system
  2. Delivering certainty and timeliness in regulatory processes
  3. Reducing inter-provincial trade barriers
  4. Invigorating competition in product markets
  5. Spurring business innovation and capital investment.

For those preoccupied with the natural resource economy, all five of those priorities are relevant. However, the most significant ones are numbers 2 and 5: regulatory times and the combined factors of innovation and investment.

Research conducted by Margareta Dovgal for Resource Works found that the impact of regulatory uncertainty on investment in oil & gas is also detrimental to Canada’s innovation performance. Market forces alone do not explain the decline in capital investment in Canadian energy, which points to a troubling loss of investor confidence.

Moreover, the resulting constraints on transportation infrastructure mean that energy sector growth is capped and therefore so is the adoption of new technologies.

While incremental process improvements are common, large-scale revamps to deliver drastically improved environmental performance typically occur when a new project (such as a mine, well, or refinery) is built. So, what happens when these projects aren’t being built?

Resource industries are typically among the largest innovation spenders. Yet in the typical urban environment, the vision of modern innovation that most readily comes to mind includes creative technology, bio-medicine, and urban infrastructure.

In other words, everything but our country’s top innovation performers.


It’s not just oil and gas, to be clear, but it’s also innovation in mining, forestry, and aquaculture that matters here.

Across natural resource industries, innovators are working to reduce emissions, deliver superior local environmental impacts from water to wildlife management, and reduce cost and stay competitive on the global commodities market so that they can continue to create Canadian jobs.

These vital activities will become more important than ever before.


Challenging times have already started.

Once this crisis is over, our federal and provincial governments will be faced with difficult decisions about spending and stimulus. Ensuring that the right enabling conditions are there for our most productive sectors is critical.

Market conditions are unavoidable for some products, but they are far from the only barrier to natural resource developments. Unlike the Saudi-Russia price war, improving both the regulatory and innovation ecosystems is very much in the hands of government.

It never made sense to kneecap our major resource development in the best of times. 

It makes even less sense to do that now, when economic recovery is needed so direly and when natural resource industries can play their part.

Comments

  1. It's regrettable and harmful that Western Canada's petroleum and natural gas industries are treated by some politicians and political pressure groups as pariah industries that if shut down would benefit the environment without hurting the economy because there are so many viable alternatives to oil and gas (which is quite untrue) - and in the process would garner lots of votes (albeit from people who don't realize how ignorant they are).
    In fact Western Canada's abundant supplies of oil, gas and coal (and other resource products like potash and wheat) are one of the main drivers of Canada's relatively prosperous economy, enabling a low-population nation to punch far above its GDP weight in world affairs.
    Please greenflakes, while you are pushing us onto the road to eco nirvana please try to realize that until we are able to get there responsibly and practically we should maximize the value and advantages of our existing resource industries which are being developed generally to excellent standards compared with communist and Third World economies.
    That is especially the case now that Canada is trying to cope with the COVID19 crisis; now is not the time to cripple Canada's economy with demands to prematurely adopt politically-correct reforms to environment and resource industries that would hurt more than help the viability of the Canadian and provincial economies.
    .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more