Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

RESOURCE WORKS -- Once this crisis is over, our federal and provincial governments will be faced with difficult decisions about spending and stimulus


Stewart Muir and Margareta Dovgal look at emerging ideas for a strong recovery from the pandemic ...



recent paper from David Williams of the Business Council of British Columbia points to Canada's nagging inability to improve living standards for its residents.

Comments Williams: "Once the COVID-19 crisis has passed, it will be important for policymakers to start addressing the inefficiencies and disincentives in Canada’s economy that have been holding back productivity growth and the spirit of innovation."

He points to five long-term priorities that will allow for a stronger economy in the recovery phase:

  1. Modernizing the tax system
  2. Delivering certainty and timeliness in regulatory processes
  3. Reducing inter-provincial trade barriers
  4. Invigorating competition in product markets
  5. Spurring business innovation and capital investment.

For those preoccupied with the natural resource economy, all five of those priorities are relevant. However, the most significant ones are numbers 2 and 5: regulatory times and the combined factors of innovation and investment.

Research conducted by Margareta Dovgal for Resource Works found that the impact of regulatory uncertainty on investment in oil & gas is also detrimental to Canada’s innovation performance. Market forces alone do not explain the decline in capital investment in Canadian energy, which points to a troubling loss of investor confidence.

Moreover, the resulting constraints on transportation infrastructure mean that energy sector growth is capped and therefore so is the adoption of new technologies.

While incremental process improvements are common, large-scale revamps to deliver drastically improved environmental performance typically occur when a new project (such as a mine, well, or refinery) is built. So, what happens when these projects aren’t being built?

Resource industries are typically among the largest innovation spenders. Yet in the typical urban environment, the vision of modern innovation that most readily comes to mind includes creative technology, bio-medicine, and urban infrastructure.

In other words, everything but our country’s top innovation performers.


It’s not just oil and gas, to be clear, but it’s also innovation in mining, forestry, and aquaculture that matters here.

Across natural resource industries, innovators are working to reduce emissions, deliver superior local environmental impacts from water to wildlife management, and reduce cost and stay competitive on the global commodities market so that they can continue to create Canadian jobs.

These vital activities will become more important than ever before.


Challenging times have already started.

Once this crisis is over, our federal and provincial governments will be faced with difficult decisions about spending and stimulus. Ensuring that the right enabling conditions are there for our most productive sectors is critical.

Market conditions are unavoidable for some products, but they are far from the only barrier to natural resource developments. Unlike the Saudi-Russia price war, improving both the regulatory and innovation ecosystems is very much in the hands of government.

It never made sense to kneecap our major resource development in the best of times. 

It makes even less sense to do that now, when economic recovery is needed so direly and when natural resource industries can play their part.

Comments

  1. It's regrettable and harmful that Western Canada's petroleum and natural gas industries are treated by some politicians and political pressure groups as pariah industries that if shut down would benefit the environment without hurting the economy because there are so many viable alternatives to oil and gas (which is quite untrue) - and in the process would garner lots of votes (albeit from people who don't realize how ignorant they are).
    In fact Western Canada's abundant supplies of oil, gas and coal (and other resource products like potash and wheat) are one of the main drivers of Canada's relatively prosperous economy, enabling a low-population nation to punch far above its GDP weight in world affairs.
    Please greenflakes, while you are pushing us onto the road to eco nirvana please try to realize that until we are able to get there responsibly and practically we should maximize the value and advantages of our existing resource industries which are being developed generally to excellent standards compared with communist and Third World economies.
    That is especially the case now that Canada is trying to cope with the COVID19 crisis; now is not the time to cripple Canada's economy with demands to prematurely adopt politically-correct reforms to environment and resource industries that would hurt more than help the viability of the Canadian and provincial economies.
    .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BC’s Forestry Decline Is a Policy Failure, Not a Market Reality -- Forestry Critic Calls for Accountability and Urgent Policy Reset

Conservative Party of BC Forestry Critic, and Kamloops - North Thompson MLA,  Ward Stamer As the Truck Loggers Association convention begins today, BC Conservative Forestry Critic Ward Stamer says British Columbia’s forestry crisis is the result of government mismanagement, not market forces, and that an urgent policy reset is needed to restore certainty, sustainability, and accountability. “For generations, forestry supported families and communities across BC,” said Stamer.  “Today, mills are closing, contractors are parking equipment, and families are being forced to leave home, not because the resource is gone, but because policy has failed.” Government data shows timber shipment values dropped by more than half a billion dollars in the past year, with harvest levels falling by roughly 50 per cent in just four years. At the same time, prolonged permitting timelines, unreliable fibre access, outdated forest inventories, and rising costs have made long-term planning impossib...

BC cannot regulate, redesign, and reinterpret its way to a stable forestry sector. Communities need clear rules, predictable timelines, and accountability for results.

Photo credit:  Atli Resources LP   BC’s Forestry Crisis Continues with Closure of Beaver Cove Chip Facility   As industry leaders, Indigenous partners, and contractors gather this week at the BC Natural Resources Forum in Prince George, the gap between government rhetoric and reality could not be clearer. Just hours after the Eby government once again touted reconciliation, certainty, and economic opportunity under DRIPA, Atli Chip Ltd, a company wholly owned by the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, announced it is managing the orderly closure of its Beaver Cove chip facility. The closure comes despite public tax dollars, repeated government announcements, and assurances that new policy frameworks would stabilize forestry employment and create long-term opportunity in rural and coastal British Columbia. “British Columbians are being told one story, while communities are living another,” said Ward Stamer, Critic for Forests. “This closure makes it clear that announcement...

Eby government signs another land-use agreement, as they say one thing and do another, during DRIPA chaos

While promising to fix DRIPA, the Eby government continues to quietly sign binding land-use agreements that fundamentally alter how Crown land is governed in British Columbia. On January 15, 2026, the government signed four ministerial orders advancing the Gwa’ni Land Use Planning Project with the ’Na̱mg̱is First Nation, amending the Vancouver Island Land Use Plan and changing how more than 166,000 hectares of Crown land can be accessed, developed, and managed. “This is Land Act reform by stealth,” said Critic for Indigenous Relations Scott McInnis. “British Columbians already rejected these changes once. In 2024, public backlash forced the NDP to pull its Land Act amendments. Instead of listening, this government has gone underground, signing individual deals behind closed doors, just like we’ve already seen in places such as Squamish, Teẑtan Biny, and across Northwest BC.” “The Premier admits DRIPA ( the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) is creating ...

Labels

Show more