Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

That the BC Liberals should have such a conversion, on the eve of an election campaign, is kind of like Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus



The latest fooferaw over bridge tolling policy is a prime example of what has gone so badly wrong in B.C. politics.


Government of BC, Todd Stone, Kamloops, MLA
Kamloops MLA, and Minister of Transportation, Todd Stone
on hand for "Completion" notice of the Port Mann Bridge
It began with the B.C. Liberal Party government's pronouncement Sunday, by Finance Minister Mike de Jong, that if they are re-elected in the May 9 provincial election they will put a cap on bridge tolls of ("only?") $500 a year, saving some regular commuters about $1,000 a year but doing nothing to help less frequent users.


That the Liberals should have such a conversion on the eve of an election campaign is kind of like Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus: it reverses many years of an opposite policy. But of course it still doesn't address the underlying problems in financing transportation projects in Metro Vancouver and around the province, namely that the Liberals' new quasi-privatized bridges have become chronic money-losers for the provincial government.



The ink was barely dry on the de Jong story, leaked to the Vancouver Province, when B.C. New Democratic Party leader John Horgan announced that if the NDP wins the election they will remove tolls entirely.  Of course he didn't explain how that move would be paid for, let alone how it would be done when there are some complex P-3 contracts in place in which the private sector ostensibly helped pay for constructing the new and money-losing Port Mann Bridge.  Presumably he would do so again on the dubious but Liberal-promised Massey Bridge (replacing the Deas Island tunnel of the same Massey name), and on the long-overdue replacement of the decrepit Pattullo Bridge between Surrey and New Westminster.

The folly of the Liberals' bridge financing model is seen in the fact that many thousands of drivers will go far out of their way to avoid the perceivably over-priced tolls on the Port Mann Bridge - some of which reflect the extra costs of the P3 model imposed by former premier Gordon Campbell in order to use the still-free Pattullo bridge, thereby creating an often huge traffic congestion problem there.

But now on the eve of an election the Liberals have noticed they're in danger of losing so, like a chronic gambler, they've doubled down on an even more ludicrous bet and then the New Democrats double down on that.

The B.C. Green Party meanwhile signaled that their heads are in the sand too by indicating they would retain the tolling policy apparently as an environmental policy designed to discourage driving to work.  Instead their policy is to "encourage" more people to car-pool or use transit, even though it should be obvious that those choices are impractical, or simply not available to most commuters. But hey who cares when we're supposedly saving the world from catastrophic climate change eh?

To be fair, there should be lots of room in B.C.'s rubber budgets to find a few hundred million dollars to subsidize transportation that facilitates commerce - except of course that the Liberals for the last 16 years have been pillaging the Crown corporations' savings accounts to falsely make it look like B.C. has had a string of balanced budgets and Canada's strongest economy and many other such claims, all dubious when one digs down for the facts.

Canada's lowest unemployment?

Only because the other provinces are worse and the many discouraged workers here who have given up seeking work aren't counted in the official stats.

Canada's strongest economy?

Again only because all the others are turtles in the tank, and the reality is that B.C.'s economy and government have been grossly under-performing for at least 20 years (i.e. since before Campbell was elected in 2001).  That's due to a combination of factors that neither the Liberals nor the New Democrats have adequately addressed and on which the Greens are hopelessly out of touch with their extreme anti-carbon policies.

All of which is a good reason why I decided on Friday to leave the B.C. Conservative Party, and become leader of the small but venerable B.C. First Party, which will be made official later this week with Elections B.C.

For me the focus will be on proposals to grow the economy, build B.C., create more jobs and spread prosperity to all - which is also why I thought the B.C. Conservatives would be a good fit for me, and I joined them about three years when I was attracted by its former leader Dan Brooks*

I have a list of at least 50 innovative policy ideas to improve British Columbia, many of them apparently too radical for the B.C. Conservatives' board of directors, such as reviving the Bank of B.C. as an investment bank (not a mere retail bank), issuing a new parallel currency (not supplanting the Canadian and American dollars), and reviving B.C.'s Treasury Branches and Government Agents services to help preserve small rural communities.  These care just a few of many other unique, but actually practical proposals.

Now as the Leader of B.C. First I'll be in a good position to advance them.  C'mon along! It should be a quite interesting ride.


John Twigg, is the newly minted leader of BC First. He was until recently the Policy and Communications Director for the BC Conservative Party


* who also encountered problems with its board of directors, many of whom are also federal Conservatives who believe there should be a unified coalition to keep the NDP out of power in B.C. even though the horse being used to do so - the B.C. Liberal Party - has become demonstrably inept and even corrupt).
Party

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It seems the call for blood donors is being responded to, however ... “This effort is a marathon, not a sprint” says Canadian Blood Services

A week and a half ago I wrote the commentary ... “ While the national inventory is currently strong, an increase in blood donor cancellations is a warning sign of potential challenges to maintaining a health inventory of blood ” It was written as a result of talk about a potential blood shortage that would occur if people stopped donating due to the COVID-19 virus. It seems the call to Canadians was responded to, however, as I was told this afternoon ... “ T his effort is a marathon, not a sprint ”. As it now stands now, donors are able to attend clinics which are held in Vancouver (2), Victoria, Surrey, and in Kelowna, so I asked if there any plans to re-establish traveling clinics to others communities - for example in Kamloops, Prince George, Prince Rupert, Revelstoke or Cranbrook, and perhaps further north at perhaps Ft. St. John? According to Communications Lead Regional Public Affairs Specialist Marcelo Dominguez, Canadian Blood Services is still on

FEDLSTED -- Rules will have to relax-- the question is how and when

The media has created a fervour over the mathematical models that allegedly help governments predict the future of Coronavirus infections in the general population. Mathematical modelling has limited use and value. We need to understand is that the data available on Coronavirus (COVID-19) infections in Canada is far too small for statistical reliability. The data available for the whole world is useless due to variables in how nations responded to Coronavirus infections. There is no commonality in steps taken to combat virus spread and no similarity in the age demographics of world nations, so the numbers you see on the daily tracking of world infections are not useful in developing a model of infection rates that can be relied on. Mathematical models of the future spread of Coronavirus are better than nothing, but not a whole lot better.  Mathematical models must include assumptions on virus spreads, and various factors involved. As they are used in projections, a small erro

When necessary – and only when necessary – the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program can attach (garnish) wages

Alan Forseth ~~ Kamloops, BC ~~ May 15th Earlier this week (Monday May 13 th ) the BC government announced it would be establishing a new Crown agency to oversee the Family Maintenance Enforcement Program (FMEP).   They indicated that on or before the end of October, the provision of family maintenance services would transition from a contracted service provider, to the newly created Crown agency. Apparently, this was to ensure that family maintenance enforcement services for vulnerable British Columbians continue uninterrupted. Seeing this story, reminded me of a woman ( we’ll call her Mary Brown ) who had email me some time b ack about this very thing, and questions she had about how maintenance enforcement was imposed and enforced. She said to me, “ I’m just curious if you can get any statistics of the homeless men and woman, that have children, that they are paying family maintenance in support of their children”.  “I am not about to sugg

Labels

Show more