Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

ADAM OLSEN -- If the goal is to create a fair and just society, then it is unfortunate that the discourse is divided into pro-labour or anti-worker, pro-taxpayer or anti-taxpayer tribes


In a post last week, I addressed French philosopher Michel Foucault's work on discipline and punishment. Reflecting on how his studies in justice and social order show up in modern society.

I included extensive quotes from the transcript of an episode of Philosophize This! by Stephen West. Today I will use the text to pivot to another issue which bothers.

"To Foucault, the goal of the modern penal system is not justice or fairness … the goal is through surveillance, normalization and examination to produce harmless, non-rebellious, working, tax-paying productive citizens who follow the rules and are satisfied with a life of conforming to the normalized standard of what it is to be a person handed down to them from above … in other words, docile, useful subjects that carry out the vision for what the future should hold given to them by the people in power."

'Dog-whistles' litter the modern political discourse, riling up segments of the population to solidify, mollify or enrage the political base for or against something”.


The units

The way we use the terms taxpayers, ratepayers, jobs, workers and specifically "the hard-working people" all trigger me.

My point here is not to diminish the importance of working or making a financial contribution to society. Instead, in so doing, we simply reduce people to economic units -- they become merely workers or taxpayers. As such, we de-humanize and categorize people.

It's the precursor for many fierce battles between "us" and "them", and "our" side and "their" side. If the goal is to create a fair and just society, then it is unfortunate that the discourse is divided into pro-labour or anti-worker, pro-taxpayer or anti-taxpayer tribes.

This provides a fertile landscape for divisive, angry politics which is far from the environment we need to solve the pressing social, environmental and economic challenges of our times.

Yes, we are workers and taxpayers, and yes jobs, the economy and a healthy environment are important. But people are so much more than an economic unit so let's not forget our dignity, respectability and decency.





Adam Olsen ... is a Green Party Member of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia for Saanich North and the Islands.
Born in Victoria, BC in 1976, Adam has lived, worked and played his entire life on the Saanich Peninsula. 
 
He is a member of Tsartlip First Nation (W̱JOȽEȽP), where he and his wife, Emily, are raising their two children, Silas and Ella.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

RCMP gag order comes after BC NDP catch heat for diverted safe supply (Northern Beat)

In the wake of several high-profile police drug seizures of suspected safer supply that put the BC NDP government on the defensive last month, BC RCMP “E” division issued a gag order on detachments, directing them to run all communications on “hot button” public safety issues through headquarters in the lead-up to the provincial election. “It is very clear we are in a pre-election time period and the topic of ‘public safety’ is very much an issue that governments and voters are discussing,” writes a senior RCMP communications official in an email dated Mar. 11 in what appears to have gone out to all BC RCMP detachments . . . . CLICK HERE for the full story

KRUGELL: BC NDP turns its attention from BC United to BC Conservatives

The BC NDP turning its attention, from BC United, to BC Conservatives was reported over the weekend from a variety of sources. It is the result of the surge in the BC Conservative's polling numbers and the subsequent collapse of BC United. The NDP has largely ignored the BC Conservatives, instead they opt to talk about issues directly or attack their old foes BC United. Practical politics says that parties closer to the centre tend to ultimately prevail over the long haul. They do wane but often make comebacks. A good example is the federal Liberals going from third party to government in 2015. Centrism has a lot of appeal on voting day. The NDP shifting its fire from United to Conservative is a reflection of reality. BC United did buy advertising online and radio over the last few months. Did that shift the polls back to them? Nope. The reality is today, the BC Conservatives are the party of the Opposition, and day by day the Conservatives are looking like a party not ready to fig

Baldrey: 2024 meets 1991? How B.C. election history could repeat itself (Times Colonist)

NOTE ... not the original image from Keith Baldrey's op/ed 1991 BC general election -- Wikipedia   A veteran NDP cabinet minister stopped me in the legislature hallway last week and revealed what he thinks is the biggest vulnerability facing his government in the fall provincial election. It’s not housing, health care, affordability or any of the other hot button issues identified by pollsters. "I think we are way too complacent,” he told me. “Too many people on our side think winning elections are easy.” He referenced the 1991 election campaign as something that could repeat itself. What was supposed to be an easy NDP victory then almost turned into an upset win for the fledgling BC Liberal Party. Indeed, the parallels between that campaign and the coming fall contest are striking ... CLICK HERE for the full story

Labels

Show more