Skip to main content

“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” ~~ John G. Diefenbaker

FELDSTED -- Stepping outside its constitutional authority is risky business for any government but Trudeau appears oblivious to constitutional convention


Mark Norman’s lawyer warns of interference in courts despite dropped charge
Lee Berthiaume, ~~ The Canadian Press ~~ May 8, 2019

OTTAWA — Canadians must be on guard against government efforts to tip the scales of justice, said Vice-Admiral Mark Norman's lawyer on Wednesday, as she hailed the surprise stay of a breach-of-trust charge against her client.

That decision came despite — "not because of" — the Trudeau government's interference in the case ... that included withholding key documents and information that could have helped ... demonstrate his (Mark Norman) innocence on allegations he tried to undermine a federal cabinet deliberation on a large shipbuilding contract.

"No person in this country should ever walk into a courtroom and feel like they are fighting their elected government or any sort of political factors at all," Henein told a packed news conference right after Norman's final court appearance.

The stay effectively ends one of the most high-profile and politically charged criminal cases in Canadian history and means it will not run through the fall federal election campaign, as had been scheduled.

CLICK HERE to read the full story
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman


The petulance and pettiness of this prosecution never fails to astound.

The prosecution did not ‘drop charges’ against Norman. It stayed charges which is quite different; the charge can be re-laid for the next year. It is not a clean break for Norman.

The decision to cover Norman’s legal fees is ironic ...  as the government denied Norman access to legal defence funds available to other government employees in the same circumstances.

The decision to stay charges against Norman is politically motivated ... the governments refusal to make documents available to defence lawyers is consistent with government efforts to hide disclosure of matters related to the SNC-Lavalin scandal.

The government is leaking information that the decision to stay the Norman charges were due to information disclosed by former Tory cabinet ministers, but that story does not hold water. Crown prosecutors do not go to court if they suspect their client is sitting on information that will blow up a case mid-trial. Additionally, refusal by the government to provide unedited copies of records indicates what is being withheld is damaging to the government case.   

There has been no evidence presented Norman was engaged in unlawful activities that warranted criminal proceedings. His transgression was to question the Prime Minister’s Office activities which appear questionable at best and criminal at worst. Wilson-Raybould, Philpott and Norman have all paid heavy penalties for questioning actions of their party and leader.


What is particularly disturbing is that the request for investigation into the Norman affair, originated with the Privy Council Office, which is an advisory body to the Governor General. It is not intended to be a tool of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) and is being abused by the PMO.

Executive powers constitutionally reside with the Queen and Governor General. It would be extraordinary for the Governor General to sanction the criminal investigation of an officer of the crown. Most people would consider that unwarranted executive interference in a democratic government.

Stepping outside its’ constitutional authority is risky business for any government, but Trudeau appears oblivious to constitutional convention. Meanwhile, other parties have been silent on how they propose to cure the disease of governments operating in secrecy while claiming to be democratic. It is not an issue confined to the current government; it is an unacceptable affront to the democratic principle of government accountability to the public and has been carried from Tory to Whig and back for decades.

The concept of unwavering allegiance to a political party and its leader rather than to the nation and its people is a repugnant affront to a democratic institution. Our elected representatives swear an oath of allegiance to Queen and country, but in practice owe their allegiance to party and leader.

We will never get rid of political parties. Like minded people will form groups as we are social animals and tend to gather in groups with similar interests and thoughts. There is nothing wrong with that; the danger is when the group insists it members adhere to policies that all of the group are not comfortable with. That is contrary to our fundamental freedoms of belief, conscience and thought. Election to office does not remove that person’s fundamental charter rights and freedoms.

Political parties must not be allowed to override an elected member’s freedom to consider an issue independently, and cast his or her vote accordingly. The independence of elected members is crucial to his or her free representation of the people who elected them. That principle of democracy has to be restored.   


John Feldsted
Political Consultant & Strategist
Winnipeg, Manitoba
Labels:

Comments

  1. garret seinenMay 13, 2019 at 7:11 AM

    The handling of both the SNC Lavalin and the Mark Norman legal affairs clearly shows the utter lack of respect for law that pervades the Trudeau Liberal government. Elsewhere you say, "the best defence for democracy is a well-informed electorate." I say it is the only defence and it is today entirely missing. While I know there are some young people coming out of school with thinking skills, publicly, few are visible.

    The media circus of today can't get past transgender, hurtful speech, plastic straw bans and the destruction of 85% of of our energy industry. The future does not look bright.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alan ForsethMay 13, 2019 at 8:56 AM

    I agree ... the biggest issue with a lack of an informed electorate, is that many Canadians are only interested in rearing about what's in it for them. Regrettably having been told, and then not delivered on promises of political parties in the past, these same people keep doing the same thing -- and they circled goes round and round.

    An educated electorate is essential, however I know from the experience of having run for political office 20+ years ago, people only hear what they want to hear -- and sadly, it seems that still hasn't changed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. garret seinenMay 13, 2019 at 9:29 AM

    Alan I concur but I think the root cause goes deeper. For generations now we have been mislead into accepting the idea that we are incapable of being productive over a lifetime. We are told a young, productive, new generation is needed to support the ever increasing geriatric death-defies. Absent rampant government induced inflation, past saving would easily carry prosperity to the end of life.

    When one believes in personal helplessness it is all to easy to reach the conclusion that milking the productive is the answer.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Okanagan Farmers Face NDP-Created Water Crisis ~~ BC Conservatives

Okanagan farmers are facing a water crisis as government-imposed restrictions threaten to kill their crops and destroy one of B.C.’s most important agricultural industries. In perhaps the most water-rich province in the country, our farmers have been left high and dry by the NDP government. For nine weeks, Okanagan and Shuswap farmers have proposed solutions, only to be met with NDP foot-dragging. Now forest fires have come to these regions as they are simultaneously reckoning with a water crisis that has been made worse through years of government inaction. Vernon-area farms have lost 70 percent of their water, while Kelowna and Summerland growers face severe restrictions. This situation is unacceptable and cannot continue. Ian Paton, Shadow Minister for Agriculture, said the NDP is once again forcing farmers to pay for its own failure to plan. "Farmers and ranchers must be listened to when decisions affecting their livelihoods are made, and under the NDP, they aren’t," said...
Post a Comment
Read more

BC Conservatives Point to Warning Signs in BC’s Economy

While Canada posted modest job gains in July, warning lights are still flashing in British Columbia. Youth unemployment remains stubbornly high, leaving too many first-time jobseekers shut out of the workforce. BC also lost 3,400 public administration jobs in July, likely as temporary Census positions ended. “BC's jobs divide remains stark. Unemployment is far higher in business-driven communities like Kelowna (9.3%) and Abbotsford-Mission (8.3%) than in Victoria (5.0%). Government should be focused on creating the conditions for private-sector investment and job growth,” said Gavin Dew, MLA for Kelowna-Mission and Shadow Minister for Economic Development. “We need an economy where young people can find work, businesses can hire, and every region has the opportunity to prosper.” This comes as BC faces five straight quarters where more businesses are closing than opening, an NDP cabinet rift over job-creating projects like Tilbury LNG, and fresh signs that even the province's to...
Post a Comment
Read more

FORSETH: That, to me, sure seems to fit with narcissistic personality disorder – AND - a definite sense of self entitlement

I think most people are aware of why England’s Henry the 8th created the Church of England. It was out of a belief that he should be able to do anything he wanted. And what did he want?  It was a male heir that would follow him and, at his death, become the next King of England.   His marriage to Catherine had not produced one, so he demanded the Pope to allow him to divorce her.  The Pope of course refused so Henry created his own church, and declared himself the "Supreme Head of the Church of England", thereby allowing him to annul the marriage. In other words, he wanted his own way, and because he had the ultimate power in England, he forced his will over the church. Many (most?) would say people suffer like that from 'narcissistic personality disorder'. The Mayo Clinic says, “ People with this disorder may lack the ability to understand or care about the feelings of others. But behind this mask of extreme confidence, they are not sure of their self-worth and are e...
5 comments
Read more

Labels

Show more